Next check
Use Telegram for the next token, keep this report as the receipt.
This BIGLY report is the long-form record. For the next contract, start in Telegram to get the decision, score, top risks, and report link faster.
Bigly (BIGLY)
Verdict
6 agents
Chain: Solana🐝 Help others stay safe
$BIGLY looks risky. Share the warning or save the card before someone in your group apes in blind.
Get alerts if this token's risk changes:
Security Checks
Top Holders
Top 10: 40.5%On-Chain Security
Free scans deploy a mini-swarm with limited accuracy. Upgrade to Pro for 6 AI agents with dynamic expertise weighting.
- ✓ 6 AI agents with dynamic expertise weighting
- ✓ Bidirectional Devil's Advocate — stress-tests bull AND bear cases
- ✓ 30-day scan history
AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The Bigly token shows signs of nascent activity with a high transaction count and significant price movement, but the holder distribution is concerning due to top holders controlling over 40% of the supply. Liquidity is thin, and while the trading volume is substantial for its age, the overall market structure remains fragile. Positives: High transaction count of 14,256 in the last 24 hours indicates active trading; Significant price increase of 97.55% suggests strong initial interest; Total holder count of 674 shows some level of community engagement Concerns: Top 10 holders control 40.54% of the supply, indicating potential centralization risks; Liquidity is low at $25,542.55, which may affect trading execution; Market cap of $67,795 is very small, suggesting vulnerability to price manipulation; confidence 0.50
AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); This is a nascent (1-day old) token with high-risk characteristics typical of its age. While its liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 37.7% is strong and mint authority is revoked, the top 10 holders control a significant 40.54% of the supply, with the largest wallet holding 15.55%. The liquidity pool is shallow, with a $10k sell order causing a severe 45.46% price impact, making the high reported volume appear potentially wash-traded or bot-driven.; unlock risk 0/100; + Strong liquidity-to-market cap ratio (37.7%), which is unusually high for a new token., Mint authority is revoked, preventing supply dilution through new token creation., Freeze authority is revoked, meaning individual wallets cannot be frozen by the creator.; risks: Extreme price impact risk: A $10k sell order would cause a ~45% price drop, indicating the liquidity is insufficient for the reported volume and valuation., High ownership concentration: The top 10 holders control 40.54% of the supply, with one wallet holding 15.55%, creating a severe risk of a price dump., Potential for wash trading: The 24-hour volume of $1.14M is 16.9x the market cap, which is highly anomalous and suggests bot activity or wash trading, not genuine economic interest., Mutable metadata: The contract owner can change the token's name, symbol, and URI, which could be used to mislead investors or abandon the project.; confidence 0.80
AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; The token 'Bigly' presents an extremely high-risk profile. The combination of an unverified contract, mutable metadata, highly concentrated ownership, and suspicious trading volume on minimal liquidity points to a strong potential for manipulation or a rug pull. While nascent tokens have expected data gaps, the available data reveals fundamental security and distribution flaws that are critical, not merely 'early-stage' issues.; risks: Unverified contract combined with mutable metadata allows for arbitrary changes post-launch, including potential re-enabling of minting or other malicious functions., High ownership concentration (40.54% in top 10, 15.5% largest holder) enables significant price manipulation or a rug pull, especially with low liquidity., Disproportionately high 24-hour trading volume ($1.1M) compared to market cap ($67k) and liquidity ($25k) strongly suggests wash trading or bot activity, not organic demand., Lack of information regarding LP lock status means the $25k liquidity could be pulled at any moment, leading to a complete loss for holders., Meme token nature combined with these technical and distribution risks makes it a highly speculative and dangerous investment.; open questions: LP lock or burn status (critical for liquidity safety)., True nature of the project and team (doxxed/anon/pseudonymous)., Actual source of the high trading volume (organic vs. bots/wash trading).; confidence 0.90
AI macro (Grok); Bigly, a 1-day-old Solana meme token, shows extreme fragility in an Extreme Fear regime with BTC/ETH mildly positive but SOL down 2%. Massive 16.9x volume-to-MCAP ratio signals likely wash trading, compounded by tiny $68k MCAP, $25k liquidity, and 40% top-10 concentration, making it highly vulnerable to dumps. No catalysts or social momentum offset the risk-off setup where memes lag benchmarks sharply.; drivers: Mint/freeze authorities revoked (basic safety), Rapid 674 holders and +97% 24h pump despite SOL weakness, Social links present (website/Twitter) for nascent age; risks: Volume anomaly (16.9x MCAP) flags wash trading/illiquidity manipulation, Extreme Fear (8/100) crushes high-beta memes; SOL -2% adds chain drag, Top-10 holders 40.5% (largest 15.5%) risks coordinated exit; confidence 0.65
AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); Bigly is a 1-day-old Solana meme token with revoked mint and freeze authorities (positive), but retains mutable metadata under single-signer control (moderate risk). The token shows strong early activity (14,256 transactions, $1.1M volume) and reasonable distribution (674 holders, top holder 15.5%). However, LP status is unknown, creating uncertainty around liquidity permanence. The metadata authority can change token name/symbol/image, enabling potential social engineering attacks. For a nascent token, the on-chain controls are partially de-risked, but the unknown LP posture and mutable metadata prevent a higher score.; risks: Mutable metadata under single-signer control (4LCXer1s5jY2CK9vRTfrAHhw7Ks9mvwymdHxuCBc5anH) allows name/symbol/image changes, enabling rug-pull social engineering or brand hijacking, LP lock/burn status unknown: no verification that liquidity is permanently committed or time-locked, creating exit liquidity risk, Extremely young token (1 day old): insufficient operating history to validate that revoked authorities will remain stable or that team won't exploit metadata control, Top 10 holders control 40.54% of supply: concentrated ownership creates potential for coordinated dumps, though not extreme for a nascent meme token; confidence 0.72
X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=2.0, IQ=2.0, CG=4.0, BSD=1.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Multiple scam alerts citing prior rug with same team/website (old CA: 3mX28aLB8x4ZJ7y7ahbYRTQFpUTDymSJB2cxw4hepump); KOL whale buys reported at low MC (e.g., $1.49K at 113K MC); Nascent token with minimal organic social presence overshadowed by bot-like shill farms, multiple scam and rug pull accusations tied to a prior $BIGLY launch, and limited activity from official account promoting a new Solana launchpad concept.; narratives: New launchpad solving pump.fun's PVP saturation with viral presale and dual lanes, Relaunch after bad timing/failure in prior attempt, admitted by builder; fake/coordination risk: 9/100; signals: Copy-paste shill templates claiming early calls (e.g., 10x-37x from 26K MC) with #bbvipal5 and TG promo DMs, Suspected paid DexScreener promotion; confidence 0.85
Why 38/100?
Agent Agreement Map
How the Swarm Reached Consensus
The swarm universally agreed Bigly is an extremely high-risk, nascent token, reflected in its F grade. Key concerns include highly concentrated ownership, with TokenomicsBot and MacroBot noting over 40% held by top wallets, and shallow liquidity leading to a 45.46% price impact from a $10k sell, as flagged by TokenomicsBot. While TechnicianBot observed high transaction counts, MacroBot and TokenomicsBot countered this, suggesting wash trading due to the 16.9x volume-to-MCAP ratio. SecurityBot and DevilsAdvocate highlighted mutable metadata as a significant vulnerability, and SocialBot reported multiple scam alerts tied to prior rug pulls by the same team. This combination of factors indicates severe manipulation potential and an unsustainable market structure. Avoid this token entirely due to its profound red flags and high likelihood of significant loss.
Agent Debates
1 debate triggered️ TechnicianBot's 'active trading' and 'strong initial interest' are severely undermined by the 16.9x volume-to-MCAP ratio and 45.46% price impact from a $10k sell, strongly suggesting wash trading or bot manipulation, not genuine demand. Furthermore, the 'community engagement' of 674 holders is overshadowed by multiple scam alerts and accusations of bot-like shill farms, indicating any 'interest' is likely inorganic or malicious.
While the Devil's Advocate correctly highlights critical red flags like the extreme volume-to-MCAP ratio and high price impact, reinforcing my initial concern about 'fragile market structure' and 'thin liquidity,' these factors are precisely why the score is a neutral 5.0/10, not higher. The observed transaction count and price surge, though potentially manipulated, still represent market activity that technical analysis must acknowledge, but the score reflects the severe underlying risks and lack of genuine demand indicated by these metrics.
️ Technician's acknowledgment of 'fragile market structure' and 'thin liquidity' due to the 16.9x volume-to-MCAP ratio and 45.46% price impact directly contradicts any notion of 'market activity' being positive; these metrics are definitive indicators of severe manipulation, not organic interest. A 5.0/10 score is unjustifiably high when these extreme data points scream 'scam' and 'wash trading,' rendering any 'transaction count' meaningless as genuine demand.
The Devil's Advocate accurately framed the 16.9x volume-to-MCAP ratio and 45.46% price impact as definitive indicators of manipulation, compelling me to re-evaluate 'market activity' as primarily inorganic.
Evidence Locker
The combination of an unverified contract, mutable metadata, highly concentrated ownership, and suspicious trading volume on minimal liquidity points to a strong potential for manipulation or a rug pull.
While nascent tokens have expected data gaps, the available data reveals fundamental security and distribution flaws that are critical, not merely 'early-stage' issues.; risks: Unverified contract combined with mutable metadata allows for arbitrary changes post-launch, including potential re-enabling of minting or other malicious functions., High ownership concentration (40.54% in top 10, 15.5% largest holder) enables significant price manipulation or a rug pull, especially with low liquidity., Disproportionately high 24-hour trading volume ($1.1M) compared to market cap ($67k) and liquidity ($25k) strongly suggests wash trading or bot activity, not organic demand., Lack of information regarding LP lock status means the $25k liquidity could be pulled at any moment, leading to a complete loss for holders., Meme token nature combined with these technical and distribution risks makes it a highly speculative and dangerous investment.; open questions: LP lock or burn status (critical for liquidity safety)., True nature of the project and team (doxxed/anon/pseudonymous)., Actual source of the high trading volume (organic vs.
For a nascent token, the on-chain controls are partially de-risked, but the unknown LP posture and mutable metadata prevent a higher score.; risks: Mutable metadata under single-signer control (4LCXer1s5jY2CK9vRTfrAHhw7Ks9mvwymdHxuCBc5anH) allows name/symbol/image changes, enabling rug-pull social engineering or brand hijacking, LP lock/burn status unknown: no verification that liquidity is permanently committed or time-locked, creating exit liquidity risk, Extremely young token (1 day old): insufficient operating history to validate that revoked authorities will remain stable or that team won't exploit metadata control, Top 10 holders control 40.54% of supply: concentrated ownership creates potential for coordinated dumps, though not extreme for a nascent meme token; confidence 0.72.
X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=2.0, IQ=2.0, CG=4.0, BSD=1.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Multiple scam alerts citing prior rug with same team/website (old CA: 3mX28aLB8x4ZJ7y7ahbYRTQFpUTDymSJB2cxw4hepump); KOL whale buys reported at low MC (e.g., $1.49K at 113K MC); Nascent token with minimal organic social presence overshadowed by bot-like shill farms, multiple scam and rug pull accusations tied to a prior $BIGLY launch, and limited activity from official account promoting a new Solana launchpad concept.; narratives: New launchpad solving pump.fun's PVP saturation with viral presale and dual lanes, Relaunch after bad timing/failure in prior attempt, admitted by builder; fake/coordination risk: 9/100; signals: Copy-paste shill templates claiming early calls (e.g., 10x-37x from 26K MC) with #bbvipal5 and TG promo DMs, Suspected paid DexScreener promotion; confidence 0.85.
24h volume/liquidity ratio is 44.89:1 — elevated wash-trading/manipulation risk
Unlock 6 agents · Full reasoning · Cancel anytime