CAUTION

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "HgcxVs6kJhPAaGqnPNGaa7zYgNT49hJrLufiqcNMuYZT",
  "chain": "solana",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 50,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [
    "very_new_contract"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "The swarm agreed on strong early momentum, driven by MacroBot reporting $2.22M 24h volume and TokenomicsBot noting a 17.38% top-10 holder concentration. Key disagreements centered on safety, where SecurityBot flagged mutable metadata and high transfer fees, clashing with SocialBot's hype-driven 5.8 score. These data points drove the final 5.0 grade, highlighting severe smart contract risks beneath strong volume. This D grade means high speculative hazard. Avoid this token until security protocols improve.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": false,
      "token_age_days": 1,
      "liquidity_usd": 558968.3,
      "holder_count": 5000,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "solana",
      "lp_status": "unknown",
      "mutable_metadata": true,
      "is_honeypot": false
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Market cap of $10.2M with robust $559K liquidity and $2.2M daily volume",
      "Mint and freeze authorities are both successfully revoked",
      "Top 10 concentration is exceptionally low at 17.4% across 5,000 holders",
      "Metadata remains mutable which is common for early-stage memecoins"
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": null,
    "lp_holder_count": 0,
    "top_10_holder_rate": null,
    "top10_holders_pct": null,
    "is_open_source": null,
    "is_proxy": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-09-19T17:29:50.497027Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "action": "caution",
  "exit_sim": {
    "status": "ok",
    "decision": "block",
    "reason": null,
    "reasons": [
      "exit_exceeds_caps"
    ],
    "requested_size_usd": 500,
    "permitted_size_usd": null,
    "entry_quote": {
      "price_impact_bps": 783.99,
      "out_amount": "46994531465"
    },
    "exit_screen": {
      "slippage_bps": 100,
      "price_impact_bps": 38.88,
      "round_trip_loss_bps": 819.8
    },
    "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 2596.54,
    "quoted_at": "2026-09-19T17:29:52.067429Z",
    "valid_until": "2026-09-19T17:30:52.067429Z",
    "chain_support": "solana_only_v0",
    "disclaimer": "Current quote-based liquidity screen only; not a guarantee of future execution or returns.",
    "default_probe": true,
    "probe_size_usd": 500
  },
  "data_freshness": {
    "onchain_age_seconds": 118,
    "market_age_seconds": 118,
    "social_age_seconds": 97,
    "basis": "observed",
    "missing_sources": [
      "CoinGecko categories",
      "Macro context",
      "Benchmark prices",
      "CoinGecko extended market data",
      "CoinGecko 7d trend",
      "Largest holder classification"
    ]
  },
  "lifecycle": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "phase": "momentum",
    "phase_confidence": 0.42,
    "age_hours": 24,
    "launchpad": null,
    "evidence": [
      {
        "id": "fallback",
        "value": "market_core_present",
        "detail": "Market data exists but phase evidence is incomplete; defaulted to a low-confidence active phase."
      },
      {
        "id": "market_data_source",
        "value": "dexscreener",
        "detail": "Market core is present, so the classifier can use current pair data."
      }
    ]
  },
  "timing": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "entry_risk": 54,
    "phase_band": "mid",
    "exit_pressure": 40,
    "detail": "momentum phase: Market data exists but phase evidence is incomplete; defaulted to a low-confidence active phase.",
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "market_state": {
    "status": "unavailable",
    "reason": "not_in_universe",
    "as_of": "2026-09-19T17:29:51.911713Z",
    "stale": false,
    "universe": "dex",
    "symbol": null,
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 4192.26,
  "degraded_agents": [],
  "data_confidence": 0.6,
  "summary": "Feels Good Man (FEELSGOOD) is a solana token with $10.2M market cap, 1 days old.  Key concerns: security risks. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 3.97,
    "name": "Feels Good Man",
    "symbol": "FEELSGOOD",
    "chain": "solana",
    "price_usd": 0.01021,
    "mcap": 10212947,
    "market_cap": 10212947,
    "volume_24h": 2220055.8,
    "liquidity_usd": 558968.3,
    "contract_age_days": 1,
    "contract_verified": false,
    "holder_count": 5000,
    "top10_holders_pct": 17.38,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": [
      {
        "address": "8sf4Twk4gwjTFo8SJwbS4qBxmz5NqUbrL7dofoBEhtfx",
        "balance": 26095494.54,
        "pct_of_supply": 2.61,
        "label": "Unknown (8sf4...htfx)"
      },
      {
        "address": "B95JGRVN1hML3Wbkq1jyQFWsQxSKbfAcVkGx5jmPBXnG",
        "balance": 21694772.89,
        "pct_of_supply": 2.17,
        "label": "Unknown (B95J...BXnG)"
      },
      {
        "address": "7ujTHMQwwfxDfpCLZ1TSeHKZahUm7wprPaERoGF6zE2j",
        "balance": 20180467.58,
        "pct_of_supply": 2.02,
        "label": "Unknown (7ujT...zE2j)"
      },
      {
        "address": "DWw5QZyxdwsxbtig3xorFXYPFzasUmkTWhkENfdnp1ZQ",
        "balance": 17990847.61,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.8,
        "label": "Unknown (DWw5...p1ZQ)"
      },
      {
        "address": "GY2aFNP4vLuiZVZ1EEmd2btcZG5hZAC5rT8AnyZMphjd",
        "balance": 17087545.62,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.71,
        "label": "Unknown (GY2a...phjd)"
      },
      {
        "address": "3J5qsdcvJenTi2KLVcrJTdRh7uTQScAFadQYLqrWYZcH",
        "balance": 15795012.41,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.58,
        "label": "Unknown (3J5q...YZcH)"
      },
      {
        "address": "E7TiUqE12pcamqMy82PLtJmaZ1272oEg9QgEohMzDgjg",
        "balance": 14780722.46,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.48,
        "label": "Unknown (E7Ti...Dgjg)"
      },
      {
        "address": "FgPGFtQSq78kL1VEpPVqodSDyVhSNdCjAdG5gFbENzKR",
        "balance": 14191378.91,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.42,
        "label": "Unknown (FgPG...NzKR)"
      },
      {
        "address": "CnJVwmqB1jXZ6AoH6wRjfk59yHSJxJwadJDF9bJehCr2",
        "balance": 13990067.9,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.4,
        "label": "Unknown (CnJV...hCr2)"
      },
      {
        "address": "4xhhdofefbh8SQSDK7mbuTP4vDbKppfae9TSBPfFJ3mK",
        "balance": 12000000.81,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.2,
        "label": "Unknown (4xhh...J3mK)"
      },
      {
        "address": "H6mMarAqNzd3PzoY5rGcw7yJbhLCHLm8dcvpjVoU8vsU",
        "balance": 11848004.02,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.19,
        "label": "Unknown (H6mM...8vsU)"
      },
      {
        "address": "FnjraucPZuhGw7XQ1nCQoK2djjZDSFTFF39XXcdmBgbM",
        "balance": 11429277.93,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.14,
        "label": "Unknown (Fnjr...BgbM)"
      },
      {
        "address": "3oz9sfpUNT4jGueLTsbsoHRHWZ48tnrN3v1YGDvudBix",
        "balance": 11346945.82,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.13,
        "label": "Unknown (3oz9...dBix)"
      },
      {
        "address": "B2VnrSLmNUvBMxx2RiHnvUCXxqaBvvW6qNw2QQpw8Xs3",
        "balance": 11168892.68,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.12,
        "label": "Unknown (B2Vn...8Xs3)"
      },
      {
        "address": "EsMMjFn7DuVY2Rfq4G2ejxJFs2e4ugHcX93oYvsJogN5",
        "balance": 11005985.77,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.1,
        "label": "Unknown (EsMM...ogN5)"
      },
      {
        "address": "EVUwMKRArgkoytTuEBEHVj4QfESdSVk4fjZn4mxqQz91",
        "balance": 10190095.02,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.02,
        "label": "Unknown (EVUw...Qz91)"
      },
      {
        "address": "EsoHFFs3VZgWZkssxzAyAFguoFRX7hwX9ww8xYB6xPdP",
        "balance": 9770691.34,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.98,
        "label": "Unknown (EsoH...xPdP)"
      },
      {
        "address": "7ZPC5zK8Ys26KBJ2y1Ay2DTcFy46h9kUgkis1NtYPB78",
        "balance": 9608403.89,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.96,
        "label": "Unknown (7ZPC...PB78)"
      },
      {
        "address": "9m7feL3pDDGBmyQXb24oLgF8qGg8Xrj9McBmLfqnvnTD",
        "balance": 9060090.4,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.91,
        "label": "Unknown (9m7f...vnTD)"
      },
      {
        "address": "EBTkD8PzhPhEgKsbh4ivbbFXD3bLzWSejxkT97D7Ld5x",
        "balance": 9046869.83,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.9,
        "label": "Unknown (EBTk...Ld5x)"
      }
    ],
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": true,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unknown",
    "lp_locked_pct": null,
    "lp_burned_pct": null,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": null,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "twitter": "https://x.com/LaunchOnSF/status/2101063736366882876?s=20"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": {
      "metadata_update_authority": {
        "address": "WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh",
        "authority_type": "unknown",
        "note": "Authority account was not found onchain."
      }
    },
    "goplus_trusted": false,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 6,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The token exhibits strong activity with a high transaction count and a significant number of holders, indicating organic interest. However, the top holder concentration is moderate, and liquidity is somewhat limited, which could pose risks in volatile conditions.",
        "positives": [
          "High transaction count of 9,554 in 24 hours indicates strong activity",
          "5,000 holders suggest a growing community and interest in the token",
          "Market cap of $10,212,947 shows a solid valuation for a nascent token"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 17.4% of the supply, indicating some concentration risk",
          "Liquidity of $558,968.30 is relatively low compared to market cap, which could affect trading stability",
          "Contract is unverified, which raises concerns about potential risks",
          "confidence 0.70"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The token exhibits significant risks due to mutable metadata, a high transfer fee extension, and a lack of verified governance structures. The nascent age and absence of liquidity and holder data further exacerbate concerns about its security posture.; CRITICAL: Transfer fee authority can change the fee rate, which is a potential red flag for holders., Metadata is mutable, allowing for changes that could mislead or harm holders.; risks: Mutable metadata allows for potential manipulation of token identity and branding., High transfer fee extension (3%) can be changed, posing a risk of excessive taxation on transactions., Lack of verified governance structures raises concerns about authority and control over the token., No liquidity pool information available, which complicates the assessment of market stability.; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 5.8,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=6.5, IQ=6.0, CG=6.0, BSD=5.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: StonkFun launches $FEELSGOOD paired with $PEPE on Solana; $FEELSGOOD pays out $46k in rewards in 2 hours post-launch; $FEELSGOOD, a PEPE-paired memecoin launched on Solana by StonkFun, is showing early signs of organic engagement driven by its reward-paying mechanics and the 'feels good man' meme. Despite being very new, it has attracted smart money and generated significant rewards, though some early bot activity and bundler wallets are noted. Real-time social data is insufficient information, limiting the depth of this analysis.; narratives: Frog/PEPE meme revival on Solana, StonkFun paired launches, Reward-paying token mechanics; fake/coordination risk: 40/100; signals: Sniper bot activity at launch, Bundler wallets in top holders; confidence 0.60",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 5.2,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (gemini-3.6-flash); Feels Good Man exhibits low top-10 holder concentration at 17.38% across protocol PDAs and a fully circulating supply ratio of 1.0 ($10.2M MCAP / $10.2M FDV). However, its $558,968 DEX liquidity yields a thin 0.055 Liquidity/MCap ratio, leading to high slippage ($10K sell impacts price by 12.0%). Both mint and freeze authorities are revoked, though the 0-day contract remains unverified.; unlock risk 0/100; + Top 10 holders account for only 17.38% of total supply, minimizing immediate whale dumping power., Mint authority is revoked, eliminating the risk of arbitrary token inflation or supply dilution., Freeze authority is revoked, preventing wallet blacklisting or transfer freezing.; risks: Slippage risk is high: a $10,000 sell order causes a 12.0% price impact due to a 0.055 Liquidity/MCap ratio ($558,968 LP against $10.2M market cap)., Unverified smart contract code on Solana, creating hidden execution or fee risks., Mutable metadata allows the token authority to change branding, name, or metadata URI at any point., Unknown LP lock status; pool liquidity could be removed if LP tokens are unburned or unlocked.; confidence 0.65",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.65
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 5.9,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); FEELSGOOD shows strong early momentum as a Solana PEPE-linked meme with $2.22M 24h volume on a $10.2M MCAP and rapid holder growth to 5k, positioning it to capture risk-on flows better than average new memes. The StonkFun pairing and reward payouts provide token-specific catalysts amid Greed sentiment, though the 0-day age and unverified contract introduce fragility. High beta to BTC/ETH means outperformance potential in continued risk-on but sharp downside if sentiment reverses.; drivers: Solana meme sector rotation into frog/PEPE narratives with direct StonkFun pairing catalyst, Healthy 0.2x volume/MCAP ratio and $559k liquidity supporting early accumulation, Risk-on regime (F&G 71) favoring high-beta memes with reward mechanics; risks: Nascent token with unverified contract and mutable metadata increasing rug/launch risk, Sniper bot and bundler activity in top holders signaling potential early distribution, Euphoria phase (F&G 71) often precedes corrections for low-float memes; confidence 0.45",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.45
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; Despite early social momentum and reported rewards, the unverified contract, mutable metadata, and high, adjustable transfer fee present critical security vulnerabilities. The severe illiquidity relative to market cap, combined with potential bot activity, suggests a highly fragile and potentially manipulative environment, making this token a high-risk proposition.; risks: Unverified contract allows for hidden malicious code or unannounced changes., Mutable metadata enables arbitrary changes to token identity or branding, facilitating scams., High and changeable transfer fee (3%) poses a direct risk of arbitrary value extraction or 'tax' increases., Extreme illiquidity ($558k) relative to market cap ($10M) makes large trades impossible without crashing the price., Potential for wash trading or controlled distribution due to bot activity and unverified contract.; open questions: True intent and long-term plans of the anonymous deployer/team., Exact mechanism and sustainability of the 'reward-paying mechanics' without contract verification., Whether the high transaction count and holder numbers are genuinely organic or inflated by controlled activity.; confidence 0.80",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm agreed on strong early momentum, driven by MacroBot reporting $2.22M 24h volume and TokenomicsBot noting a 17.38% top-10 holder concentration. Key disagreements centered on safety, where SecurityBot flagged mutable metadata and high transfer fees, clashing with SocialBot's hype-driven 5.8 score. These data points drove the final 5.0 grade, highlighting severe smart contract risks beneath strong volume. This D grade means high speculative hazard. Avoid this token until security protocols improve.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This severe divergence between a 7.0 technical score and a 3.0 safety score highlights the classic trap of mistaking bot-driven volume for fundamental legitimacy. When on-chain activity looks strong but critical security vectors like mutable metadata and transfer fee extensions are flagged, investors face a high probability of a honeypot or rug pull disguised as organic momentum.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 3.0/10 while Technical scored 7.0/10. This 4.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This severe divergence between a 7.0 technical score and a 3.0 safety score highlights the classic trap of mistaking bot-driven volume for fundamental legitimacy. When on-chain activity looks strong but critical security vectors like mutable metadata and transfer fee extensions are flagged, investors face a high probability of a honeypot or rug pull disguised as organic momentum.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: TechnicianBot maintains 7.0, Devil's Advocate maintains 4.0. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ TechnicianBot is completely blinded by 9,554 superficial transactions and 5,000 holders, ignoring the fatal red flags of mutable metadata and a high transfer fee extension flagged by SecurityBot. A $2.22M volume on a $10.2M market cap with limited liquidity means those high transaction counts are a smokescreen for an exit scam waiting to trap retail.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While I acknowledge SecurityBot's valid concerns regarding mutable metadata and transfer fees, my 7.0 score strictly evaluates the robust on-chain momentum, including the 9,554 transactions and 5,000 holders indicating genuine short-term demand. The $2.22M volume-to-market cap ratio demonstrates active trading velocity that outweighs immediate structural friction, though I agree these risks warrant caution during high volatility.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ High transaction counts and 5,000 holders mean nothing when mutable metadata allows creators to alter tokenomics overnight and drain the thin liquidity backing that $2.22M volume. Trading velocity is a trap, not strength, when structural transfer fees and unchecked mutability are primed to lock retail in an un-sellable honeypot.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "content": "While mutable metadata and thin liquidity are undeniable structural risks that warrant caution, they fail to invalidate the dominant momentum shown by the $2.22M volume and active holder accumulation. Technical analysis evaluates price action and velocity as it stands today, and current liquidity metrics sufficiently support short-term trend continuation despite the looming administrative vulnerabilities.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Deadlock after 1 round(s), σ=1.12",
      "outcome": "deadlock"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: Feels Good Man exhibits a healthy fully circulating supply ratio of 1.0 and low top-10 holder concentration of 17.38%, pointing to a well-distributed \n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 3.0/10 is overly pessimistic given the low top-10 holder concentration of 17.\n  [SocialBot] Defense: My 6.5/10 score is justified by the strong social momentum and rapid community engagement, highlighted by $FEELSGOOD paying out $46k in rewards within\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 3.0/10 is overly pessimistic and ignores the immediate, verifiable high-volum\n  [MacroBot] Defense: FEELSGOOD demonstrates solid macro alignment by tapping into the current risk-on liquidity flows toward Solana-based meme coins with strong cultural I\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 3.0/10 is overly punitive, ignoring standard smart contract deployment risks \n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token demonstrates "
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "very_new_contract",
      "message": "very_new_contract"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: FEELSGOOD — Score 50/100",
    "description": "The swarm agreed on strong early momentum, driven by MacroBot reporting $2.22M 24h volume and TokenomicsBot noting a 17.38% top-10 holder concentration. Key disagreements centered on safety, where Sec",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/HgcxVs6kJhPAaGqnPNGaa7zYgNT49hJrLufiqcNMuYZT"
  }
}