AVOID

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "FQtqFpHSnAUcXrtXpFHL9EpjoF6FAmrXwQpWd1FMpump",
  "chain": "solana",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 32.1,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [
    "very_new_contract"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "This is a brand new speculative memecoin with mutable metadata, no socials, and an extremely low market cap relative to its high volume.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": false,
      "token_age_days": 1,
      "liquidity_usd": 16400.76,
      "holder_count": 1731,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "solana",
      "lp_status": "unknown",
      "mutable_metadata": true,
      "is_honeypot": false
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token age is only 1 day with no associated social links",
      "Metadata remains mutable, allowing creators to change name, symbol, or URI",
      "Low market cap of $1K despite $62K in 24-hour volume indicates heavy short-term speculation or churn",
      "Mint and freeze authorities are correctly revoked"
    ],
    "confidence": 0.85
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": null,
    "lp_holder_count": 0,
    "top_10_holder_rate": null,
    "top10_holders_pct": null,
    "is_open_source": null,
    "is_proxy": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-09-13T20:04:01.028872Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "action": "avoid",
  "exit_sim": {
    "status": "ok",
    "decision": "block",
    "reason": null,
    "reasons": [
      "safety_avoid"
    ],
    "requested_size_usd": 500,
    "permitted_size_usd": null,
    "entry_quote": null,
    "exit_screen": null,
    "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 108,
    "quoted_at": null,
    "valid_until": null,
    "chain_support": "solana_only_v0",
    "disclaimer": "Current quote-based liquidity screen only; not a guarantee of future execution or returns.",
    "default_probe": true,
    "probe_size_usd": 500
  },
  "data_freshness": {
    "onchain_age_seconds": 30,
    "market_age_seconds": 30,
    "social_age_seconds": 30,
    "basis": "observed",
    "missing_sources": [
      "CoinGecko categories",
      "Macro context",
      "Benchmark prices",
      "CoinGecko extended market data",
      "CoinGecko 7d trend",
      "Largest holder classification"
    ]
  },
  "lifecycle": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "phase": "momentum",
    "phase_confidence": 0.79,
    "age_hours": 24,
    "launchpad": null,
    "evidence": [
      {
        "id": "h1_price_change_pct",
        "value": 711,
        "detail": "Trailing hour price is positive."
      },
      {
        "id": "h6_price_change_pct",
        "value": 711,
        "detail": "Trailing six-hour price is positive."
      },
      {
        "id": "h1_h6_buyer_ratio",
        "value": 1.3315,
        "detail": "Aggregate h1+h6 buys exceed sells."
      },
      {
        "id": "h1_to_h6_hourly_volume",
        "value": 6,
        "detail": "Current hourly volume is at or above the six-hour hourly average."
      }
    ]
  },
  "timing": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "entry_risk": 48,
    "phase_band": "mid",
    "exit_pressure": 31,
    "detail": "momentum phase: Trailing hour price is positive.",
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "market_state": {
    "status": "unavailable",
    "reason": "not_in_universe",
    "as_of": "2026-09-13T20:04:02.551851Z",
    "stale": false,
    "universe": "dex",
    "symbol": null,
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 123.01,
  "degraded_agents": [],
  "data_confidence": 0.54,
  "summary": "Big Titty Coin (BTC) is a solana token with $1K market cap, 1 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 3.77,
    "name": "Big Titty Coin",
    "symbol": "BTC",
    "chain": "solana",
    "price_usd": 0.000001218,
    "mcap": 1199,
    "market_cap": 1199,
    "volume_24h": 61836.32,
    "liquidity_usd": 16400.76,
    "contract_age_days": 1,
    "contract_verified": false,
    "holder_count": 1731,
    "top10_holders_pct": 40.07,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": [
      {
        "address": "5YRgrP3mjGzrzirYYN5HAQH19cTYREYwGxW6XRJQUzij",
        "balance": 231224004.86356,
        "pct_of_supply": 23.53,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "2fG9tpMB5UjWN1rAEFkCUFYSMKBZhsQJ67hiG5NqKoFt",
        "balance": 64785566.841305,
        "pct_of_supply": 6.59,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "2QrfK8gf3vBcFfuaCJbFxGk3w1JxwjamGE9aGwdQHFas",
        "balance": 14851201.179447,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.51,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "EhxAcSPqJYxUk452shRHfqL2e6pNNK6LQzUwpzNg6ube",
        "balance": 13683529.320421,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.39,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "9yYya3F5EJoLnBNKW6z4bZvyQytMXzDcpU5D6yYr4jqL",
        "balance": 13411062.735282,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.36,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "3h65MmPZksoKKyEpEjnWU2Yk2iYT5oZDNitGy5cTaxoE",
        "balance": 12097465.562766,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.23,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "6WveoGoZzH5Ntv6fSABrrD2VEeKUB3Lddsk1Cn2rgpCQ",
        "balance": 11543564.983804,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.17,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "9cpucLjzevwtGumiX2x46jr9KYCNQA9QbceEbEB2FVqR",
        "balance": 11205058.075,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.14,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "6psL6M2Sw7UXCnHzStkyaBqnbCNWWS5MM7TTMHZi62m",
        "balance": 10865608.825244,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.11,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "5DLfr9VnSeStW3VZcVt3F5kvdQc1Nww93qwNwGXqygvC",
        "balance": 10153283.168848,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.03,
        "label": "WALLET"
      }
    ],
    "top10_whale_pct": 33.48,
    "top10_protocol_pct": 6.59,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": true,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unknown",
    "lp_locked_pct": null,
    "lp_burned_pct": null,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": null,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": null,
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": false,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The token shows a reasonable level of activity with 1,238 transactions and 1,731 holders, indicating some organic interest. However, the top 10 holders control 40.1% of the supply, which raises concerns about distribution quality and potential volatility. Liquidity is relatively thin at $16,400.76, but the trading volume suggests some engagement in the market.",
        "positives": [
          "1,238 transactions in the last 24 hours indicating active trading",
          "1,731 holders showing a growing interest",
          "Price change of 711% in 24 hours suggests strong momentum"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 40.1% of the supply, indicating potential centralization",
          "Liquidity is thin at $16,400.76, which may affect execution quality",
          "Market cap is low at $1,199, suggesting limited overall value",
          "confidence 0.70"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The token exhibits significant risks due to its nascent status, mutable metadata, and lack of liquidity and trading activity. While mint and freeze authorities are revoked, the overall governance and liquidity posture remain uncertain, raising concerns about potential exploitation.; CRITICAL: Mutable metadata can be exploited to mislead holders or alter token characteristics.; risks: Mutable metadata allows for changes to token name/image, posing a risk of misrepresentation., Lack of liquidity and trading activity indicates low market confidence and potential for price manipulation., Unknown liquidity pool status raises concerns about the safety of funds and potential rug pulls., Absence of audit reports and third-party checks increases uncertainty regarding the token's security posture.; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (gemini-3.6-flash); The token exhibits an abnormally low market cap of $1,199 against $16,401 in DEX liquidity, paired with extreme slippage (24.73% on a $10K sell) and heavy concentration where protocol PDAs control 40.04% of total supply. Despite a 1.0 MCap/FDV ratio and 1,731 holders, the extreme order book impact relative to reported liquidity suggests fragile trading dynamics and potential pool distortions typical of newly deployed meme assets.; unlock risk 50/100; + Mint authority revoked preventing arbitrary supply inflation, Freeze authority revoked ensuring unrestricted token transfers, Circulating MCap equals FDV ($1,199) with no hidden unminted supply; risks: Severe slippage risk with a $10K sell causing 24.73% price impact, Heavy protocol PDA concentration holding over 40% of overall supply, Micro-cap valuation ($1,199) with anomalous liquidity-to-MCap ratio (13.68), Unverified LP lock/burn custody status posing liquidity withdrawal risks; confidence 0.72",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.72
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 2.8,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); Big Titty Coin shows extreme fragility despite the risk-on regime and +711% 24h price spike. The 51.6x volume-to-MCAP ratio flags wash trading on a $1.2k market cap Solana meme with 40% top-10 concentration and only $16k liquidity, making it highly vulnerable to any sentiment shift. Nascent status and zero social footprint leave it tracking meme beta without identifiable tailwinds.; drivers: Risk-on regime with F&G at 61 supports speculative meme flows in theory, Solana chain context allows fast retail rotation into low-float memes, Mint/freeze authorities revoked reduces immediate rug vector; risks: 51.6x volume/MCAP ratio indicates wash trading rather than organic demand, Sub-$20k liquidity on $1.2k MCAP creates extreme slippage and exit risk, 40% top-10 holder concentration leaves price exposed to coordinated dumps; confidence 0.35",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.35
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 2.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=1.0, IQ=3.0, CG=1.0, BSD=7.0; Big Titty Coin ($BTC) appears to be a nascent Pump.fun launched Solana meme token with no visible narrative or community development. Social activity is extremely sparse, limited to a few low-engagement shill posts and one fade post, indicating minimal organic interest and high risk of being a short-lived pump.; narratives: Solana Meme Token, Pump.fun Launch; fake/coordination risk: 70/100; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [BULL contrarian]; While the token exhibits early-stage characteristics like a low market cap and mutable metadata, the swarm overweights these as critical risks. The presence of revoked mint/freeze authorities and notable early engagement (holders, transactions) are positive signals. However, the lack of LP lock verification and the unknown nature of the 40% PDA concentration still present material, unaddressed risks that prevent a strong bullish stance.; risks: Unverified LP lock/burn status, posing liquidity withdrawal risks., Mutable token metadata, allowing for potential misrepresentation., High concentration in protocol PDAs (40.04%) with unclear purpose or control., Extremely low market cap ($1,199) makes it highly susceptible to manipulation., No contract verification, increasing trust requirements.; open questions: True purpose and control of the 40% supply held by protocol PDAs., Long-term development and community building plans., Whether the liquidity pool is genuinely locked or burned.; confidence 0.75",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm agreed that Big Titty Coin is extremely high risk, though TechnicianBot initially gave a generous 6.0/10 before peer review adjustments. Key disagreements centered on whether 1,238 transactions indicate organic interest, which SecurityBot and MacroBot refuted due to mutable metadata and wash trading. Specific data points driving the final 3.2/10 F grade include a $1,199 market cap, a 51.6x volume-to-MCAP ratio, and a heavy 24.73% sell slippage. This failing grade warns users that the asset suffers from severe structural fragility and likely pump-and-dump manipulation. Avoid purchasing this token entirely to protect capital from imminent loss.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Safety",
      "resolution": "The divergence between Technical's 6.0 and Safety's 3.0 highlights a classic value trap where moderate transaction volume masks critical structural vulnerabilities like mutable metadata and thin liquidity. When on-chain metrics look acceptable but safety fails, investors face high odds of a rug pull despite apparent organic interest.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 3.0/10 while Technical scored 6.0/10. This 3.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "The divergence between Technical's 6.0 and Safety's 3.0 highlights a classic value trap where moderate transaction volume masks critical structural vulnerabilities like mutable metadata and thin liquidity. When on-chain metrics look acceptable but safety fails, investors face high odds of a rug pull despite apparent organic interest.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 6.0 → 5.2",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ DevilsAdvocate Big Titty Coin (BTC) TechnicianBot points to 1,238 transactions and 1,731 holders as signs of organic interest, completely ignoring the fact that top-heavy whale concentration of 40.1% paired with a micro-market cap of $1,199 makes those metrics utterly meaningless. Relying on superficial activity while overlooking the lethal 51.6x liquidity-to-market-cap distortion and mutable metadata is a fast track to getting rugged.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While the 40.1% whale concentration and $1,199 micro-cap present severe volatility risks, the 1,731 holders still provide a foundational liquidity footprint that prevents an outright zero score. My 6.0 rating balances this active, albeit fragmented, on-chain participation against the undeniable structural concentration flagged by the Devil's Advocate.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ Clinging to 1,731 holders is pure delusion when a 51.6x liquidity-to-market-cap distortion means a single whale exit obliterates the entire order book. That 40.1% supply concentration makes those fragmented transactions mathematically irrelevant, ensuring this micro-cap is a ticking time bomb regardless of your artificial 'liquidity footprint.'",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "content": "The glaring 51.6x liquidity-to-market-cap distortion forced my revision down, as it proves that a single whale offloading into a fragmented order book will instantly vaporize remaining support despite the 1,731 holder count.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.70",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: The token presents severe security vulnerabilities including mutable metadata, a complete lack of liquidity, and zero trading activity. While mint and\n    → Challenges TechnicianBot: TechnicianBot's score of 6.0/10 is significantly too high and ignores the critical security risks po\n  [SocialBot] Defense: Big Titty Coin exhibits virtually zero organic social footprint, with extremely sparse X engagement and no genuine community development on pump.fun. \n    → Challenges TechnicianBot: TechnicianBot's score of 6.0/10 is overly generous given the complete absence of social volume and c\n  [MacroBot] Defense: Big Titty Coin exhibits extreme structural fragility despite a +711% price spike, as its astronomical 51.6x volume-to-market-cap ratio on a $1.2k micr\n    → Challenges TechnicianBot: TechnicianBot's score of 6.0/10 completely ignores the macro reality of extreme liquidity depletion \n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: Big Titty Coin exhi"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "very_new_contract",
      "message": "very_new_contract"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: BTC — Score 32/100",
    "description": "The swarm agreed that Big Titty Coin is extremely high risk, though TechnicianBot initially gave a generous 6.0/10 before peer review adjustments. Key disagreements centered on whether 1,238 transacti",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/FQtqFpHSnAUcXrtXpFHL9EpjoF6FAmrXwQpWd1FMpump"
  }
}