CAUTION

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "DEW9dSN6QpWyNthphCpMmAbZP1Q4cEKR9xQXAri98WDP",
  "chain": "solana",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 58.1,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [
    "very_new_contract"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "Brand new memecoin with mutable metadata and minimal social presence poses a high rug-pull risk despite decentralized holders.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": false,
      "token_age_days": 3,
      "liquidity_usd": 1233106.82,
      "holder_count": 5000,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "solana",
      "lp_status": "unknown",
      "mutable_metadata": true,
      "is_honeypot": false
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token is only 3 days old with a memecoin identity",
      "Metadata remains mutable allowing potential name and symbol changes",
      "Top 10 concentration is low at 14.5% but limited social presence raises concerns"
    ],
    "confidence": 0.85
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": null,
    "lp_holder_count": 0,
    "top_10_holder_rate": null,
    "top10_holders_pct": null,
    "is_open_source": null,
    "is_proxy": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-09-24T17:18:01.079368Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "action": "caution",
  "exit_sim": {
    "status": "ok",
    "decision": "block",
    "reason": null,
    "reasons": [
      "exit_exceeds_caps"
    ],
    "requested_size_usd": 500,
    "permitted_size_usd": null,
    "entry_quote": {
      "price_impact_bps": 460.87,
      "out_amount": "62732693531"
    },
    "exit_screen": {
      "slippage_bps": 100,
      "price_impact_bps": 33.79,
      "round_trip_loss_bps": 493.1
    },
    "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 4413.12,
    "quoted_at": "2026-09-24T17:18:03.016516Z",
    "valid_until": "2026-09-24T17:19:03.016516Z",
    "chain_support": "solana_only_v0",
    "disclaimer": "Current quote-based liquidity screen only; not a guarantee of future execution or returns.",
    "default_probe": true,
    "probe_size_usd": 500
  },
  "data_freshness": {
    "onchain_age_seconds": 125,
    "market_age_seconds": 124,
    "social_age_seconds": 109,
    "basis": "observed",
    "missing_sources": [
      "CoinGecko categories",
      "Macro context",
      "Benchmark prices",
      "CoinGecko extended market data",
      "CoinGecko 7d trend",
      "Largest holder classification"
    ]
  },
  "lifecycle": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "phase": "distribution",
    "phase_confidence": 0.48,
    "age_hours": 72,
    "launchpad": null,
    "evidence": [
      {
        "id": "h1_price_change_pct",
        "value": -3.75,
        "detail": "Price has rolled over, but the full distribution rule was incomplete."
      },
      {
        "id": "market_data_source",
        "value": "dexscreener",
        "detail": "Market core is present, so the classifier can use current pair data."
      }
    ]
  },
  "timing": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "entry_risk": 66,
    "phase_band": "late",
    "exit_pressure": 68,
    "detail": "distribution phase: Price has rolled over, but the full distribution rule was incomplete.",
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "market_state": {
    "status": "unavailable",
    "reason": "not_in_universe",
    "as_of": "2026-09-24T17:18:02.836225Z",
    "stale": false,
    "universe": "dex",
    "symbol": null,
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 9248.3,
  "degraded_agents": [],
  "data_confidence": 0.6,
  "summary": "Super Inu (SI) is a solana token with $7.8M market cap, 3 days old. The Swarm found deep liquidity ($1.2M). Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 2.62,
    "name": "Super Inu",
    "symbol": "SI",
    "chain": "solana",
    "price_usd": 0.007767,
    "mcap": 7767379,
    "market_cap": 7767379,
    "volume_24h": 3227841.23,
    "liquidity_usd": 1233106.82,
    "contract_age_days": 3,
    "contract_verified": false,
    "holder_count": 5000,
    "top10_holders_pct": 14.52,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": [
      {
        "address": "DcpYAKLzwFV8G1Q9V5sTn5m4MLqdaB3yJ4Qm87QgXNd8",
        "balance": 22257146.16,
        "pct_of_supply": 2.23,
        "label": "Unknown (DcpY...XNd8)"
      },
      {
        "address": "8ou3QLBLB6rfRjcioWWaEpRd922wpRoCdgP5VbLs78E7",
        "balance": 19455727.73,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.95,
        "label": "Unknown (8ou3...78E7)"
      },
      {
        "address": "ErwFkQfFeV2Reg7ayPPhTbPcUmVwSqDCarRqvGkSDDt6",
        "balance": 16068904.79,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.61,
        "label": "Unknown (ErwF...DDt6)"
      },
      {
        "address": "4f9AEdECCjJeuwjm37wMPNGANCk8ioAMJ3L3oQoQwBvt",
        "balance": 15718418.8,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.57,
        "label": "Unknown (4f9A...wBvt)"
      },
      {
        "address": "CxeBetg2Nurm3JH56iTgofUdfP5qjHRQuVpLApzHkSTG",
        "balance": 13607667.72,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.36,
        "label": "Unknown (CxeB...kSTG)"
      },
      {
        "address": "FPvLVUhnj5u2J6AaoU3rYktb9Z2uwSAKzE96krDGSiZx",
        "balance": 12511148.96,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.25,
        "label": "Unknown (FPvL...SiZx)"
      },
      {
        "address": "4ppDY8G3itznEqq4X6TG5m7Lig2Mv986orE765tZxc43",
        "balance": 12009370.88,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.2,
        "label": "Unknown (4ppD...xc43)"
      },
      {
        "address": "jmfk94BAx8qAStcxPrhWvVEQhYsWDjit2Y21LPCAdRA",
        "balance": 11455006.34,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.15,
        "label": "Unknown (jmfk...AdRA)"
      },
      {
        "address": "ZgaKvzogrgbc8YzJVduAqwwWthAvYujofmBe8wNdW7f",
        "balance": 11273108.46,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.13,
        "label": "Unknown (ZgaK...dW7f)"
      },
      {
        "address": "Ak61VqhFFGcBRhV4QeCX3FJZAvAXMr4pMZBcKPiHZNPX",
        "balance": 10612118.59,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.06,
        "label": "Unknown (Ak61...ZNPX)"
      },
      {
        "address": "99YZpWGYajdy5prm1ZUjw1NyQxQTxJ1Nq4ugTeV9LoAB",
        "balance": 10093336.74,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.01,
        "label": "Unknown (99YZ...LoAB)"
      },
      {
        "address": "B9b1o3tF61ceQYE9RG69sEm9y2zwf1oV2VnYkkQhP6CG",
        "balance": 9473340.07,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.95,
        "label": "Unknown (B9b1...P6CG)"
      },
      {
        "address": "2ZGVhDHQjpzN5PCtgguYJA4XCR1gv9CnWqREWVv8NkcX",
        "balance": 9399360.8,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.94,
        "label": "Unknown (2ZGV...NkcX)"
      },
      {
        "address": "qYCGjRW28KrLdQuiTGQqiuBpcWVBZZTR8Z9TbdveZfz",
        "balance": 8375553.99,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.84,
        "label": "Unknown (qYCG...eZfz)"
      },
      {
        "address": "9pnihY2zYj1NmJ2QU1Hit5CwdGhYBxyTEaT27Ptzj5Ry",
        "balance": 8367199.43,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.84,
        "label": "Unknown (9pni...j5Ry)"
      },
      {
        "address": "EgdT5PjQpYrUpuwhV7M3yjZoxVg1jF2GjfiCDisQTgY",
        "balance": 8295689.65,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.83,
        "label": "Unknown (EgdT...QTgY)"
      },
      {
        "address": "CkA7cZg2msvL3hA68Gid7wXoX3kGpQ7qsk13iGtw6bpy",
        "balance": 8288399.94,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.83,
        "label": "Unknown (CkA7...6bpy)"
      },
      {
        "address": "BS7N1L1Daz9zGjWnvSeGmNe6EtBZxZq2yjijxAANviJH",
        "balance": 7611631.12,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.76,
        "label": "Unknown (BS7N...viJH)"
      },
      {
        "address": "8ZvUGPuxtHGrCDwu7XqDmNrLnTM47jmPLfyPpt4BjT4R",
        "balance": 7608161.32,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.76,
        "label": "Unknown (8ZvU...jT4R)"
      },
      {
        "address": "78QTw7oLeBJdQD8fkUMppo9TQvSR5nXpg9KyNs2nYZ4B",
        "balance": 7419557.72,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.74,
        "label": "Unknown (78QT...YZ4B)"
      }
    ],
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": true,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unknown",
    "lp_locked_pct": null,
    "lp_burned_pct": null,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": null,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "twitter": "https://x.com/search?q=$SI"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": {
      "metadata_update_authority": {
        "address": "WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh",
        "authority_type": "unknown",
        "note": "Authority account was not found onchain."
      }
    },
    "goplus_trusted": false,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 5.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The token has some safety features in place, such as revoked mint and freeze authorities, but the presence of mutable metadata and a transfer fee extension introduces risks. The lack of liquidity and market activity raises concerns about holder safety and potential exploitation.; CRITICAL: Transfer fee authority can change fee rates, which poses a risk to holders., Mutable metadata could be used to alter token characteristics without holder consent.; risks: Mutable metadata allows for potential changes to token attributes, which could mislead holders., Transfer fee extension can be manipulated, allowing the authority to impose high fees on transactions., Lack of liquidity could lead to significant price volatility and difficulty in exiting positions., Unknown LP status raises concerns about liquidity provider safety and potential rug pull risks.; confidence 0.50",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 5.8,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The token exhibits a high transaction count and a reasonable holder base for its nascent age, indicating some organic interest. However, the liquidity is relatively thin compared to the market cap, and the top holder concentration suggests potential fragility in distribution.",
        "positives": [
          "High transaction count of 8,713 in the last 24 hours indicates active trading",
          "5,000 holders suggest a growing interest and potential for organic distribution",
          "Top 10 holders only control 14.5% of the supply, indicating a relatively decentralized holder base"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Liquidity of $1,233,106.82 is low relative to the market cap of $7,767,379.00, indicating potential fragility",
          "No data on total volume across all venues limits understanding of overall market activity",
          "Contract age is only 3 days, which may lead to uncertainty in long-term viability",
          "confidence 0.60"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 5.8,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=6.0, IQ=6.5, CG=6.0, BSD=6.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Trump proposes renaming AI to 'Super Intelligence' (SI), sparking multi-chain $SI memecoin launches; Super Inu ($SI) emerged on Solana around September 22, 2026, capitalizing on the 'Super Intelligence' narrative linked to Trump, sparking a multi-chain meme war. Despite significant early smart money accumulation and high trading volume on Solana, community frustration over dumping and high insider concentration suggest a mixed social health outlook.; narratives: Trump 'Super Intelligence' (SI) vs AI meme, Multi-chain competition for $SI supremacy, Super Inu superhero dog meme on Solana; fake/coordination risk: 40/100; confidence 0.60",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 7.3,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (gemini-3.6-flash); Super Inu exhibits a highly dispersed distribution structure with top 10 protocol PDAs holding just 14.52% of the supply and total holder count exceeding 5,000. Liquidity is robust at $1.23M against a $7.77M market cap (0.159 Liquidity/MCap ratio), backed by $3.23M in 24h DEX volume and fully circulating supply (1.0 MCap/FDV ratio). Both mint and freeze authorities are revoked.; unlock risk 0/100; + Mint authority and freeze authority are fully revoked, Top 10 holders control a very low 14.52% of total supply across protocol PDAs, Healthy DEX liquidity of $1,233,107 representing 15.9% of the $7.77M market cap; risks: LP status details (lock or burn percentage) are unverified in the dataset, Mutable metadata allows potential cosmetic alterations by the update authority, Moderate slippage impact of 14.39% on larger $50k sell trades, Nascent token age (3 days old) entails inherent early-stage volatility; confidence 0.82",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.82
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 5.4,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); Super Inu sits in a risk-on regime with Greed at 71 but faces mixed positioning as a nascent Solana meme tied to the Trump 'Super Intelligence' narrative. High 24h volume (0.4x MCAP) and 111% price surge show speculative momentum, yet insider concentration and Solana dumping signals limit resilience. Overall setup tracks broader meme beta without clear outperformance edge.; drivers: Trump SI narrative providing short-term meme catalyst across chains, Healthy 24h DEX volume of $3.23M on $7.77M MCAP indicating trader interest, Risk-on regime with F&G 71 supporting speculative meme flows; risks: High bundler/insider concentration (40%+ bundlers, 64% insiders) raising dump risk, Solana community frustration and selling despite narrative catalyst, Multi-chain competition diluting supremacy for Solana deployment; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; Despite a strong narrative and initial speculative interest, Super Inu ($SI) presents significant fundamental security risks due to its unverified contract, mutable metadata, and a transfer fee extension that could be exploited. The low liquidity relative to market cap makes it highly susceptible to price manipulation and potential rug pulls, rendering it a high-risk, low-conviction asset.; risks: Unverified contract combined with mutable metadata and transfer fee extension creates a high risk of rug pull or arbitrary fee manipulation., Low liquidity ($1.2M) relative to market cap ($7.7M) makes the token extremely volatile and vulnerable to large price swings from whale movements., Nascent age (3 days) and 'risk-on' market conditions suggest current price action is driven by speculation and narrative, not sustainable fundamentals., Uncertain LP status and lack of audit increase the risk of liquidity removal or other exploits., Concentrated ownership (14.52% by top 10 holders) poses a significant threat to stability given the thin liquidity.; open questions: The true nature and manipulability of the transfer fee extension due to unverified contract., The long-term intentions of the top holders and their potential impact on liquidity., The actual status of LP lock and whether it can be removed.; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm agreed that Super Inu benefits from viral momentum driven by Trump's Super Intelligence narrative. However, SecurityBot and DevilsAdvocate flagged critical risks including mutable metadata, thin liquidity, and unverifiable contracts. TokenomicsBot highlighted a dispersed supply with top PDAs holding 14.52% and over 5,000 holders, balancing the 5.8 grade. This D grade means high speculative interest is heavily outweighed by structural vulnerabilities, signaling severe risk of sudden loss. Investors should avoid this token due to unmitigated exploit vectors despite active social hype.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This divergence highlights the classic trap where high transaction volume masks acute structural vulnerabilities like mutable metadata and thin liquidity. When technical metrics outpace safety, investors face severe rug-pull and exploit risks despite apparent organic momentum.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 4.0/10 while Technical scored 6.0/10. This 2.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This divergence highlights the classic trap where high transaction volume masks acute structural vulnerabilities like mutable metadata and thin liquidity. When technical metrics outpace safety, investors face severe rug-pull and exploit risks despite apparent organic momentum.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TokenomicsBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: TokenomicsBot maintains 7.8, Devil's Advocate maintains 3.5. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TokenomicsBot",
          "targetName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "⚔️ {\n  \"verdict_swarm_analysis\": {\n    \"token\": \"Super Inu (SI)\",\n    \"devils_advocate_response\": \"TokenomicsBot obsesses over a 14.52% top-10 holder metric and $1.23M liquidity while completely ignoring SecurityBot's failing 4.0/10 safety score and the precarious nature of a nascent Solana memecoin riding a fleeting Trump headline. A 0.159 liquidity ratio means nothing when speculative interest evaporates and insider wallets unload hidden clusters not captured by basic PDA filters.\"\n  }\n}",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "{\n  \"tokenomics_bot_defense\": {\n    \"token\": \"Super Inu (SI)\",\n    \"score_maintained\": \"7.8/10\",\n    \"response\": \"While SecurityBot's failing safety score highlights crucial protocol risks, my tokenomics analysis specifically evaluates supply distribution, holder decentralization, and liquidity depth. A 14.52% top-10 concentration and a 0.159 liquidity-to-market-cap ratio objectively represent exceptionally strong structural economics that mitigate immediate market manipulation, even if smart contract vulnerabilities persist. Tokenomics and security are distinct vectors; strong economic design justifies this score independently of code safety.\"\n  }\n}",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TokenomicsBot",
          "targetName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "⚔️ TokenomicsBot clings to a 14.52% top-10 concentration metric while ignoring that a 4.0/10 security score means code vulnerabilities can instantly render that distribution irrelevant. A 0.159 liquidity ratio offers zero protection when speculative Trump-headline volume vanishes and smart contracts fail.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "TokenomicsBot",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.69",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [SocialBot] Defense: My 6.2 score for Super Inu (SI) reflects the initial viral momentum on X/Twitter driven by the breaking Trump 'Super Intelligence' narrative, backed b\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: Your 4.0 score is overly punitive and ignores the rapid, organic social sentiment and viral narrativ\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: Super Inu demonstrates solid organic interest with a strong transaction count and reasonable holder growth for its age, balancing its AI integration n\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 4.0 is overly pessimistic, failing to properly weigh the active on-chain volu\n  [MacroBot] Defense: Super Inu sits in a favorable risk-on macro regime with Greed at 71, but high insider concentration and Solana dumping signals warrant caution. While \n    → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score of 7.8/10 is overly optimistic and ignores severe insider concentration and ac\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: Super Inu demonstrate"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "very_new_contract",
      "message": "very_new_contract"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: SI — Score 58/100",
    "description": "The swarm agreed that Super Inu benefits from viral momentum driven by Trump's Super Intelligence narrative. However, SecurityBot and DevilsAdvocate flagged critical risks including mutable metadata, ",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/DEW9dSN6QpWyNthphCpMmAbZP1Q4cEKR9xQXAri98WDP"
  }
}