AVOID

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "2FW3eNWNKSkJFdrSUwPC2U8zxu9MjExgVYxR5Wd7pump",
  "chain": "solana",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 19.1,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [
    "high_holder_concentration",
    "low_liquidity"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "Extremely low market cap, low volume, and 97 percent holder concentration in individual wallets indicate a high-risk micro-cap token with minimal traction.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": false,
      "token_age_days": 7,
      "liquidity_usd": 4526.54,
      "holder_count": 398,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "solana",
      "mutable_metadata": false,
      "is_honeypot": false
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Market cap is critically low at $4K with negligible 24h volume of $86.62",
      "Top 10 holders control 97.0% of the supply in individual wallets with zero protocol-controlled distribution",
      "Token age is only 7 days with very low liquidity and limited holder base of 398 wallets"
    ],
    "confidence": 0.95
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 398,
    "lp_holder_count": 0,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.9695,
    "top10_holders_pct": 96.95,
    "is_open_source": null,
    "is_proxy": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
        "severity": "high",
        "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
        "value": 96.95
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
      "value": 96.95
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-08-22T22:39:53.047646Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "action": "avoid",
  "exit_sim": {
    "status": "ok",
    "decision": "block",
    "reason": null,
    "reasons": [
      "safety_avoid"
    ],
    "requested_size_usd": 500,
    "permitted_size_usd": null,
    "entry_quote": null,
    "exit_screen": null,
    "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 31.05,
    "quoted_at": null,
    "valid_until": null,
    "chain_support": "solana_only_v0",
    "disclaimer": "Current quote-based liquidity screen only; not a guarantee of future execution or returns.",
    "default_probe": true,
    "probe_size_usd": 500
  },
  "data_freshness": {
    "onchain_age_seconds": 28,
    "market_age_seconds": 28,
    "social_age_seconds": 28,
    "basis": "observed",
    "missing_sources": [
      "Token-2022 extensions",
      "LP status",
      "Largest holder classification"
    ]
  },
  "lifecycle": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "phase": "dormant",
    "phase_confidence": 0.84,
    "age_hours": 168,
    "launchpad": {
      "name": "pump.fun",
      "graduation_pct": null,
      "graduated_at": null,
      "migrated_pool": "8Yf89bdwatdXVczxt9SCqPHC1dcULnjKqaGL8enEPnDS",
      "source": "dexscreener"
    },
    "evidence": [
      {
        "id": "volume_24h_usd",
        "value": 88.07,
        "detail": "Trailing 24-hour volume is below the dormant threshold."
      },
      {
        "id": "market_data_source",
        "value": "dexscreener",
        "detail": "Market core is present, so the classifier can use current pair data."
      }
    ]
  },
  "timing": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "entry_risk": 96,
    "phase_band": "dead",
    "exit_pressure": 62,
    "detail": "dormant phase: Trailing 24-hour volume is below the dormant threshold.",
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "market_state": {
    "status": "unavailable",
    "reason": "not_in_universe",
    "as_of": "2026-08-22T22:39:54.124136Z",
    "stale": false,
    "universe": "dex",
    "symbol": null,
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 33.95,
  "degraded_agents": [],
  "data_confidence": 0.66,
  "summary": "TOADLAYER (TOADLAYER) is a solana token with $4K market cap, 7 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 0.02,
    "name": "TOADLAYER",
    "symbol": "TOADLAYER",
    "chain": "solana",
    "price_usd": 0.00000373,
    "mcap": 3704.45,
    "market_cap": 3704.45,
    "volume_24h": 86.62,
    "liquidity_usd": 4526.54,
    "contract_age_days": 7,
    "contract_verified": false,
    "holder_count": 398,
    "top10_holders_pct": 96.95,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": 0,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": [
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 774343893.928555,
        "pct_of_supply": 78.04,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 100094892.585312,
        "pct_of_supply": 10.09,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 34440065.764047,
        "pct_of_supply": 3.47,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 18616138.649562,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.88,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 8062659.364743,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.81,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 7169776.123259,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.72,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 6395666.540999,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.64,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 5123843.730327,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.52,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 4695420.084051,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.47,
        "label": "WALLET"
      },
      {
        "address": "",
        "balance": 3079627.248091,
        "pct_of_supply": 0.31,
        "label": "WALLET"
      }
    ],
    "top10_whale_pct": 96.95,
    "top10_protocol_pct": 0,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "lp_locked_pct": null,
    "lp_burned_pct": null,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": null,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://www.toadlayer.fun/",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/toadlayer01"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": false,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 2.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The token exhibits signs of structural fragility with a high concentration of holders and low transaction activity. While there is some liquidity present, the overall market engagement is minimal, indicating potential issues with organic trading and long-term holder health.",
        "positives": [
          "Recent deployment with a contract age of 7 days",
          "Liquidity available at $4,526.54",
          "Transaction count of 19 in the last 24 hours"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "High top 10 holder concentration at 97%",
          "Low holder count of 398",
          "Total volume across all venues is only $86.62",
          "confidence 0.60"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The token has a mixed security posture due to its very recent deployment and lack of comprehensive market data. While the mint and freeze authorities are revoked, indicating a safer control structure, the absence of liquidity and holder activity raises concerns about its viability and potential risks.; risks: Lack of liquidity and market activity, No audit or third-party verification, Recent deployment with no historical performance, Unknown LP status and governance; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 1.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (gemini-3.6-flash); TOADLAYER presents extreme structural fragility with 97.2% of its total supply concentrated in the top 10 holders. Although market capitalization ($3,704) and DEX liquidity ($4,527) yield a superficial Liquidity/MCap ratio of 1.22, absolute depth is completely inadequate, evidenced by an 80.52% price impact on a $10K sell simulation and near-zero 24h volume ($87).; unlock risk 95/100; + Mint authority is fully revoked, Freeze authority is fully revoked, Metadata is immutable; risks: Extreme supply concentration: top 10 wallets hold 97.2% of supply (largest address holds 78.7%), Severe liquidity degradation: $10K trade simulation results in 80.52% negative price impact, Price collapse: Token has plummeted -99.22% over the last 7 days, Negligible trading activity: total 24-hour volume is just $87 across all venues; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 1.8,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); TOADLAYER shows extreme fragility as a 0-day Solana meme with 0.0x volume/MCap ratio, 96.95% top-10 concentration, and a 99% 7-day price collapse despite neutral regime and 71 Greed reading. It diverges sharply from Solana ecosystem TVL gains and tracks BTC/ETH downside with amplified illiquidity risk. No identifiable catalysts offset the liquidity and concentration vulnerabilities.; drivers: Solana ecosystem TVL +4.1% (chain-level proxy), Greed sentiment (71/100) providing mild risk-on backdrop, Mint/freeze authorities revoked and metadata immutable; risks: 24h volume 0.0x mcap signaling severe illiquidity, Top-10 holders control 96.95% creating dump risk, Price -99.22% over 7 days with 21% volatility; confidence 0.35",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.35
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 1.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=1.0, IQ=1.0, CG=0.5, BSD=1.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: TOADLAYER listed among 33 coins that died in last 24h as website went offline; TOADLAYER appears to be a defunct Solana memecoin, characterized by a classic pump-and-dump narrative, with its website now offline and being listed among 'coins that died'. Social activity is dominated by past promotional calls and lacks any current organic discussion or credible influencer engagement.; narratives: classic Solana memecoin pump-and-dump narrative, early TG alpha calls vs late X discovery, post-pump collapse; fake/coordination risk: 90/100; signals: heavy promotional activity from memecoin callers promoting TG groups, low organic discussion; mostly paid shills referencing past runs; confidence 0.90",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 2.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [BULL contrarian]; Despite a clean security profile regarding mint/freeze authorities and immutable metadata, TOADLAYER exhibits catastrophic failure in market activity, liquidity, and holder distribution. The extreme price collapse, negligible trading volume, and overwhelming holder concentration indicate a dead project, not an undervalued opportunity. The 'website offline' report confirms a lack of project viability.; risks: Extreme supply concentration (96.95% in top 10 holders), Catastrophic price depreciation (-99.22% in 7 days), Negligible trading activity (0 transactions in 24h per raw data, $87 volume per agent), Severe liquidity degradation (80.52% price impact on $10K sell simulation), Project abandonment (website offline, no organic activity); open questions: LP lock status (unknown), True intent of top holders, Reason for website going offline; confidence 0.90",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm agreed TOADLAYER is extremely fragile, driven by SocialBot reporting it as a dead coin with an offline website. Key disagreements centered on SecurityBot praising revoked mint and freeze authorities versus TokenomicsBot highlighting a catastrophic 97.2% top-10 holder concentration. Specific data points driving the final 1.9/10 grade include a micro market capitalization of $3,704 and a 0.0x volume-to-market-cap ratio. This failing grade warns users that the token represents an active structural trap with zero trading activity and extreme whale risk. Avoid interacting with this asset entirely to protect your capital from total loss.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Tokenomics",
      "resolution": "This conflict exposes a classic liquidity illusion where decent surface-layer ratios mask a catastrophic 97.2% top-holder supply concentration. For investors, ignoring such toxic tokenomics while trusting technical stability is fatal, as those top 10 wallets hold unilateral power to drain the $4,527 DEX liquidity pool at will.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Tokenomics scored 1.5/10 while Technical scored 4.0/10. This 2.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Tokenomics reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "This conflict exposes a classic liquidity illusion where decent surface-layer ratios mask a catastrophic 97.2% top-holder supply concentration. For investors, ignoring such toxic tokenomics while trusting technical stability is fatal, as those top 10 wallets hold unilateral power to drain the $4,527 DEX liquidity pool at will.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SecurityBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 5.0 → 3.8",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SecurityBot",
          "targetName": "Security",
          "content": "⚔️ SecurityBot is dangerously naive to lean on revoked mint and freeze authorities when 97.2% of the total supply is centralized in a handful of wallets for a 0-day token with zero volume. A clean contract means nothing if the top holders can instantly dump an illiquid asset to zero with zero resistance.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While the Devil's Advocate correctly highlights the severe risk of 97.2% supply concentration and zero initial volume, these structural red flags are precisely why the token is capped at a mediocre 5.0 rather than a failing score. Revoked mint and freeze authorities merely remove protocol-level rug vectors, but extreme holder centralization on a 0-day asset keeps it in high-risk territory.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SecurityBot",
          "targetName": "Security",
          "content": "⚔️ Dismissing 97.2% supply concentration as merely keeping the token in 'high-risk territory' dangerously understates the reality that a 0-day, zero-volume asset with this level of whale dominance guarantees total capital destruction upon first liquidity. Revoked mint and freeze authorities are completely irrelevant when insiders hold near-total supply and can bypass contract restrictions to dump directly into an empty order book.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "The realization that zero initial liquidity combined with 97.2% whale dominance creates an insurmountable vector for immediate capital extraction upon trading activation forced a sharp downward revision of our safety threshold.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.76",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: TOADLAYER exhibits catastrophic structural fragility with 97.2% of its total supply concentrated in the top 10 holders. While its absolute liquidity o\n    → Challenges TechnicianBot: TechnicianBot's score of 4.0/10 completely overlooks the extreme whale concentration, which guarante\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 5.0/10 vastly overrates the token's security by ignoring the systemic risk po\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: My score of 5.0/10 accurately reflects a balanced risk assessment where the revoked mint and freeze authorities provide essential foundational safety,\n    → Challenges TokenomicsBot: Your score of 1.5/10 is overly pessimistic because it ignores the positive safety signal of revoked \n    → Challenges MacroBot: Your score of 2.1/10 underestimates the protective value of secure token authorities, prematurely pe\n    → Challenges SocialBot: Your score of 1.5/10 is too harsh given that lack of early co"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "high_holder_concentration",
      "message": "high_holder_concentration"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "low_liquidity",
      "message": "low_liquidity"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: TOADLAYER — Score 19/100",
    "description": "The swarm agreed TOADLAYER is extremely fragile, driven by SocialBot reporting it as a dead coin with an offline website. Key disagreements centered on SecurityBot praising revoked mint and freeze aut",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/2FW3eNWNKSkJFdrSUwPC2U8zxu9MjExgVYxR5Wd7pump"
  }
}