UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0xfe1d0f8d6443db9ee4b6d03c6788e3f80150fae0",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 16.6,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [
    "high_holder_concentration",
    "very_new_contract"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "This is a brand new token with extreme holder concentration, indicating a likely developer-controlled asset with potential for a rug pull.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 1,
      "liquidity_usd": 329265.86000000004,
      "holder_count": 154876,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "critical",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token is only 1 day old, making it extremely new and unproven.",
      "Top 10 holders control 99.7% of the supply, with 0% attributed to protocol-controlled wallets, suggesting overwhelming individual control.",
      "Market Cap of $412K with $329K in liquidity is relatively healthy for a new token, but the concentration negates this positive.",
      "Mint and Freeze authorities are revoked, which is positive, but insufficient to mitigate the holder concentration risk.",
      "No social presence (links) makes it impossible to verify the project's legitimacy or stated purpose.",
      "RugCheck data is N/A, which is neutral, but the fundamental on-chain data points to high risk."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.95
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 154876,
    "lp_holder_count": 1,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.997,
    "top10_holders_pct": 99.7,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
        "severity": "high",
        "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
        "value": 99.7
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
      "value": 99.7
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-04T16:41:55.997627Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 2469.49,
  "summary": "Vanguard digital Oil Reserve (VDOR) is a base token with $412K market cap, 1 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 0,
    "name": "Vanguard digital Oil Reserve",
    "symbol": "VDOR",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.0004115,
    "mcap": 411582,
    "market_cap": 411582,
    "volume_24h": 182.89,
    "liquidity_usd": 329265.86000000004,
    "contract_age_days": 1,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 154876,
    "top10_holders_pct": 99.7,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": null,
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The Vanguard Digital Oil Reserve (VDOR) token exhibits significant structural fragility due to extreme holder concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 99.7% of the supply. Despite a relatively high transaction count for a nascent token, the low trading volume and liquidity raise concerns about execution quality and market depth.",
        "positives": [
          "Contract is verified, providing some level of trust",
          "High holder count of 154,876 indicates interest",
          "24-hour transaction count of 116 suggests some level of activity"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 99.7% of the total supply, indicating extreme concentration",
          "24-hour trading volume is only $182.89, reflecting thin liquidity",
          "Total liquidity of $329,265.86 is low relative to market cap of $411,582",
          "confidence 0.50"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "The Vanguard Digital Oil Reserve (VDOR) token exhibits significant structural fragility due to extreme holder concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 99.7% of the supply. Despite a relatively high transaction count for a nascent token, the low trading volume and liquidity raise concerns about execution quality and market depth.",
        "positives": [
          "Contract is verified, providing some level of trust.",
          "High holder count of 154,876 indicates interest.",
          "24-hour transaction count of 116 suggests some level of activity.",
          "Price change of 0.32% indicates stability in a risk-off environment."
        ],
        "negatives": [
          "Top 10 holders control 99.7% of the total supply, indicating extreme concentration.",
          "24-hour trading volume is only $182.89, reflecting thin liquidity.",
          "Total liquidity of $329,265.86 is low relative to market cap of $411,582.",
          "Lack of exchange listings and broader venue data limits trading options."
        ],
        "anomaly_flags": [],
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "contract_age_days": 1,
        "tx_count_24h": 116,
        "volume_24h": 182.89,
        "price_usd": 0.0004115
      }
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 1.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; VDOR presents an extremely high-risk profile due to critical security vulnerabilities: 99.7% token concentration, unlocked liquidity, and unknown mint authority. These factors, combined with suspicious holder metrics and a complete lack of project information, indicate a high probability of a rug pull. The token fundamentally fails on security and credibility, making it an unsuitable investment.; risks: Catastrophic rug pull risk due to 99.7% token concentration in top 10 holders and 0% LP lock., Unknown mint authority status, allowing for potential unlimited token minting and value dilution., Suspiciously high holder count (150k+) for a 1-day-old token with only 116 transactions, suggesting Sybil attacks or artificial distribution., Complete lack of project description, whitepaper, or roadmap, indicating no clear utility or underlying value proposition., Extremely low 24-hour transaction volume ($182.89) relative to market cap and liquidity, pointing to minimal genuine trading activity.; open questions: Status of mint authority (renounced or not)., True purpose and utility of the 'Vanguard digital Oil Reserve' token., Identity and intentions of the top 10 holders controlling 99.7% of the supply.; confidence 0.95",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.95
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 1.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); The token exhibits extremely dangerous tokenomics, characterized by a top 10 holder concentration of 99.7% and 100% unlocked liquidity, creating a severe risk of a rug pull. Despite a high liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 80%, the minuscule 24-hour volume of $183 against a $411k market cap and $329k liquidity pool indicates the liquidity is likely not genuine and trading activity is virtually nonexistent.; unlock risk 100/100; + High liquidity-to-market cap ratio (80%), though its authenticity is highly questionable., Contract is verified on-chain., MCap/FDV ratio is 1.0, indicating no immediate dilution from uncirculated supply (though this is overshadowed by holder concentration).; risks: Extreme insider control with top 10 holders owning 99.7% of the supply., 100% of liquidity is unlocked, posing a maximum rug pull risk., Virtually zero trading volume ($183) relative to market cap ($411k) and liquidity ($329k), suggesting fake liquidity and no real market interest., The holder count (154,876) is anomalously high for a 1-day-old token with no volume, indicating potential wallet dusting or artificial inflation.; confidence 0.90",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.9,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "The token exhibits extremely dangerous tokenomics, characterized by a top 10 holder concentration of 99.7% and 100% unlocked liquidity, creating a severe risk of a rug pull. Despite a high liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 80%, the minuscule 24-hour volume of $183 against a $411k market cap and $329k liquidity pool indicates the liquidity is likely not genuine and trading activity is virtually nonexistent.",
        "key_risks": [
          "Extreme insider control with top 10 holders owning 99.7% of the supply.",
          "100% of liquidity is unlocked, posing a maximum rug pull risk.",
          "Virtually zero trading volume ($183) relative to market cap ($411k) and liquidity ($329k), suggesting fake liquidity and no real market interest.",
          "The holder count (154,876) is anomalously high for a 1-day-old token with no volume, indicating potential wallet dusting or artificial inflation.",
          "The MCap/FDV ratio of 1.0, while seemingly positive, is misleading given the extreme supply concentration in a few wallets."
        ],
        "positives": [
          "High liquidity-to-market cap ratio (80%), though its authenticity is highly questionable.",
          "Contract is verified on-chain.",
          "MCap/FDV ratio is 1.0, indicating no immediate dilution from uncirculated supply (though this is overshadowed by holder concentration)."
        ],
        "unlock_risk": 100,
        "distribution_assessment": "Distribution is extremely centralized and fragile. The top 10 holders control 99.7% of the supply, granting them absolute control over the token's price and future. The holder count of 154,876 is highly suspect for a 1-day-old token with almost no trading volume, suggesting it may be artificially inflated through airdrops or dusting to create a false impression of a wide distribution. This structure is indicative of a potential pump-and-dump scheme rather than a project with organic growth.",
        "comparable_models": {
          "successful": [],
          "failed": [
            "Typical 'honeypot' or 'rug pull' tokens with high initial liquidity and extreme insider concentration."
          ]
        },
        "confidence": 0.9,
        "mcap": 411582,
        "fdv": 411582,
        "mcap_fdv_ratio": 1,
        "top10_holders_pct": 99.7,
        "holder_count": 154876,
        "liquidity_usd": 329265.86000000004,
        "liquidity_mcap_ratio": 0.8
      }
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 1.8,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); In an extreme fear risk-off regime (F&G 11/100) with BTC/ETH mildly green but low volatility, nascent VDOR faces acute fragility from 99.7% top-10 holder concentration and near-zero volume (0.0004x MCAP), making it prone to dumps despite $329k liquidity. RWA/oil reserve narrative offers no offsetting catalysts amid absent social discourse or whale activity, positioning it weaker than Base chain peers or broader RWA sector. High ETH beta via Base exacerbates downside in any sentiment worsening.; drivers: Base chain exposure provides mild ETH beta alignment in +0.4% market cap day, Liquidity ($329k) covers ~80% of $411k MCAP, adequate for size if volume picks up, RWA sector could attract risk-off flows seeking real-asset ties; risks: 99.7% top-10 concentration screams rug-pull vulnerability, unusual even for 1-day token, Negligible $183 24h volume flags illiquidity, amplifies drawdown in risk-off, No token-specific catalysts, team/LP/tokenomics data, or X discourse; confidence 0.80",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "In an extreme fear risk-off regime (F&G 11/100) with BTC/ETH mildly green but low volatility, nascent VDOR faces acute fragility from 99.7% top-10 holder concentration and near-zero volume (0.0004x MCAP), making it prone to dumps despite $329k liquidity. RWA/oil reserve narrative offers no offsetting catalysts amid absent social discourse or whale activity, positioning it weaker than Base chain peers or broader RWA sector. High ETH beta via Base exacerbates downside in any sentiment worsening.",
        "key_drivers": [
          "Base chain exposure provides mild ETH beta alignment in +0.4% market cap day",
          "Liquidity ($329k) covers ~80% of $411k MCAP, adequate for size if volume picks up",
          "RWA sector could attract risk-off flows seeking real-asset ties",
          "154k holders signal some distribution interest despite concentration"
        ],
        "key_risks": [
          "99.7% top-10 concentration screams rug-pull vulnerability, unusual even for 1-day token",
          "Negligible $183 24h volume flags illiquidity, amplifies drawdown in risk-off",
          "No token-specific catalysts, team/LP/tokenomics data, or X discourse",
          "Extreme fear regime weights liquidity/drawdown risks heavily for microcaps"
        ],
        "correlations": {
          "btc": "high positive beta (tracks BTC risk sentiment as new crypto token)",
          "eth": "very high beta (Base L2 dependency amplifies ETH moves)",
          "rates": "negative (higher rates crush risk-off microcaps)",
          "dxy": "mild negative (stronger USD pressures crypto liquidity)"
        },
        "sector_outlook": "RWA: Neutral speculative; oil reserve gimmick unproven with no TVL/on-chain utility, lags DeFi/infra peers in risk-off",
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "volume_24h": 182.89,
        "mcap": 411582
      }
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); VDOR is a 1-day-old token on Base with severe structural red flags that create immediate exploitability. The contract inherits OpenZeppelin Ownable, granting the owner unrestricted control over critical functions. Top 10 holders control 99.7% of supply with 100% of liquidity unlocked, creating trivial rug execution paths. The token has 154,876 holders in 24 hours—a distribution pattern inconsistent with organic growth and suggestive of airdrop farming or bot activity. With only $182 in 24h volume against $411k market cap (0.04% velocity), the token exhibits no genuine trading activity. The combination of owner privileges, extreme concentration, unlocked liquidity, and artificial holder inflation on a day-old contract represents a textbook high-risk setup. No operating history exists to constrain theoretical privileges.; CRITICAL: Active owner privileges on day-1 contract with no renunciation or timelock, 99.7% supply concentration in top 10 holders—trivial cartel control, 100% unlocked liquidity—instant rug execution possible, Holder count (154k) divorced from volume ($182)—clear artificial inflation; risks: Owner privileges active with no renunciation: contract inherits OpenZeppelin Ownable, granting deployer control over privileged functions. On a 1-day-old token, this is an executable rug vector with no historical constraint., Catastrophic holder concentration: top 10 wallets control 99.7% of supply. Combined with owner control and unlocked LP, insiders can execute coordinated dumps or liquidity withdrawal at will., 100% liquidity unlocked: all $329k liquidity is withdrawable immediately. No lock, no burn, no time-delay protection. Owner or LP provider can drain liquidity in a single transaction., Artificial holder inflation: 154,876 holders in 24 hours is mechanically impossible via organic trading ($182 volume). Pattern suggests airdrop farming, bot wallets, or holder-count manipulation to fake legitimacy.; confidence 0.92",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.92,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "VDOR is a 1-day-old token on Base with severe structural red flags that create immediate exploitability. The contract inherits OpenZeppelin Ownable, granting the owner unrestricted control over critical functions. Top 10 holders control 99.7% of supply with 100% of liquidity unlocked, creating trivial rug execution paths. The token has 154,876 holders in 24 hours—a distribution pattern inconsistent with organic growth and suggestive of airdrop farming or bot activity. With only $182 in 24h volume against $411k market cap (0.04% velocity), the token exhibits no genuine trading activity. The combination of owner privileges, extreme concentration, unlocked liquidity, and artificial holder inflation on a day-old contract represents a textbook high-risk setup. No operating history exists to constrain theoretical privileges.",
        "key_risks": [
          "Owner privileges active with no renunciation: contract inherits OpenZeppelin Ownable, granting deployer control over privileged functions. On a 1-day-old token, this is an executable rug vector with no historical constraint.",
          "Catastrophic holder concentration: top 10 wallets control 99.7% of supply. Combined with owner control and unlocked LP, insiders can execute coordinated dumps or liquidity withdrawal at will.",
          "100% liquidity unlocked: all $329k liquidity is withdrawable immediately. No lock, no burn, no time-delay protection. Owner or LP provider can drain liquidity in a single transaction.",
          "Artificial holder inflation: 154,876 holders in 24 hours is mechanically impossible via organic trading ($182 volume). Pattern suggests airdrop farming, bot wallets, or holder-count manipulation to fake legitimacy.",
          "No genuine market activity: $182 in 24h volume against $411k market cap = 0.04% turnover. Token has no real buyers. Liquidity and market cap figures are likely self-referential (team-provided liquidity with no external validation)."
        ],
        "critical_flags": [
          "Active owner privileges on day-1 contract with no renunciation or timelock",
          "99.7% supply concentration in top 10 holders—trivial cartel control",
          "100% unlocked liquidity—instant rug execution possible",
          "Holder count (154k) divorced from volume ($182)—clear artificial inflation"
        ],
        "confidence": 0.92,
        "mint_authority": null,
        "freeze_authority": null,
        "lp_status": "unlocked",
        "contract_verified": true
      }
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 1,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=1.0, IQ=1.0, CG=1.0, BSD=2.0; No direct mentions of the specific contract address or official project on X. Sparse, low-engagement posts reference $VDOR on Base or other chains, likely unrelated tokens or bots. No evidence of organic community, influencers, or narratives tied to this nascent token.; fake/coordination risk: 9/100; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "No direct mentions of the specific contract address or official project on X. Sparse, low-engagement posts reference $VDOR on Base or other chains, likely unrelated tokens or bots. No evidence of organic community, influencers, or narratives tied to this nascent token.",
        "fake_engagement_risk": 9,
        "confidence": 0.4,
        "sub_dimensions": {
          "organic_engagement": {
            "score": 1,
            "rationale": "No posts with meaningful engagement; one possible bot signal with 0 likes.",
            "weight": 0.4
          },
          "influencer_quality": {
            "score": 1,
            "rationale": "No notable influencers; unrelated Solana shills dominate $VDOR searches.",
            "weight": 0.25
          },
          "community_growth": {
            "score": 1,
            "rationale": "No growth signals; pre-fetched metrics null, live search confirms absence.",
            "weight": 0.2
          },
          "bot_spam_detection": {
            "score": 2,
            "rationale": "Searches yield bot-like trading signals and deploy bots (e.g., @clanker_world), high risk of fake hype.",
            "weight": 0.15
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm unanimously agreed VDOR is an extremely high-risk token, earning an F grade due to overwhelming evidence of structural fragility and potential for a rug pull. Key data points driving this consensus include the top 10 holders controlling 99.7% of the supply and 100% unlocked liquidity, as highlighted by TokenomicsBot and SecurityBot. Despite a high holder count, SecurityBot flagged this as inconsistent with organic growth, while SocialBot found no legitimate social presence. The final grade signifies an unsuitable, high-probability scam. Avoid this token entirely due to critical vulnerabilities.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 2.0 → 1.8",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ TechnicianBot's 'positives' are dangerously misleading: a verified contract means little when the owner has 'unrestricted control' and '100% unlocked liquidity' (SecurityBot, TokenomicsBot), enabling a trivial rug pull. Furthermore, 154,876 holders in 24 hours isn't 'interest' but 'inconsistent with organic growth and suggestive of airdrop farming or bot activity' (SecurityBot), especially with 'no evidence of organic community' (SocialBot).",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging the valid concerns regarding owner control and potential bot activity influencing holder count, my technical analysis score of 2.0/10 remains justified. The extreme holder concentration (99.7% in top 10) and critically low trading volume/liquidity are dominant technical red flags indicating severe market fragility and execution risk, which are core to my domain. The 'positives' were noted as basic technical data points, but their weight is significantly diminished by the broader context of technical illiquidity and centralization.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ Technician's focus on holder concentration and liquidity, while valid technical metrics, fails to adequately weigh the foundational 'unrestricted control' and '100% unlocked liquidity' (SecurityBot, TokenomicsBot) that directly enable a rug pull, rendering any technical analysis of market dynamics moot. The 'extreme holder concentration' they cite is exacerbated, not mitigated, by the owner's absolute control, making the token's fragility an existential threat rather than merely a market inef...",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "content": "The Devil's Advocate correctly highlights that 'unrestricted control' and '100% unlocked liquidity' fundamentally undermine any technical analysis of market dynamics, as they create an absolute vulnerability for a rug pull irrespective of other metrics, necessitating a score reduction.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "high_holder_concentration",
      "message": "high_holder_concentration"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "very_new_contract",
      "message": "very_new_contract"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: VDOR — Score 17/100",
    "description": "The swarm unanimously agreed VDOR is an extremely high-risk token, earning an F grade due to overwhelming evidence of structural fragility and potential for a rug pull. Key data points driving this co",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0xfe1d0f8d6443db9ee4b6d03c6788e3f80150fae0"
  }
}