UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0xc0634090f2fe6c6d75e61be2b949464abb498973",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 53.8,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [
    "high_holder_concentration"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "The swarm reached strong consensus: all 6 agents converged on Grade D.\n⚖️ Technical vs Tokenomics: This conflict highlights that strong technical indicators, like transaction activity, can mask fundamental weaknesses. Good technicals might attract short-term interest, but poor tokenomics, particularly high concentration, signal significant long-term risks like price manipulation or limited organic growth potential from centralized control.\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot: Compromise: 6.0 → 4.8\nMost optimistic: Technician (6.0/10) — AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); Keeta (KTA) shows a mixed on-chain health profile with a significant holder count and reasonable transaction activity, but high concentration among top holders raises concerns about distribution quality.\nMost critical: Devil's Advocate (3.5/10) — AI contrarian (Gemini 2.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 415,
      "liquidity_usd": 9356028.6,
      "holder_count": 135573,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Market Cap of $87.3M and Liquidity of $9.4M are substantial and proportional, indicating good market depth.",
      "Token age of 415 days demonstrates long-term stability and survival beyond typical scam lifecycles.",
      "Mint and Freeze authorities are both revoked, preventing malicious inflation or freezing of funds by developers.",
      "LP is unlocked, which is standard for established tokens and allows for market flexibility.",
      "High holder count (135,573) suggests broad distribution and community engagement.",
      "Top 10 concentration of 65.5% is high, but without knowing the specific nature of these wallets (e.g., CEX, protocol treasury, large investors), it's difficult to definitively classify as a critical risk, especially given the token's age and overall health. It warrants monitoring but isn't an immediate red flag for a rug pull.",
      "Active social presence (website, twitter, discord) indicates ongoing project development and community interaction."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.95
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 135573,
    "lp_holder_count": 13,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.6553,
    "top10_holders_pct": 65.53,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
        "severity": "medium",
        "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is elevated",
        "value": 65.53
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "severity": "medium",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is elevated",
      "value": 65.53
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-25T13:11:16.801221Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 10000,
  "summary": "Keeta (KTA) is a well-established base token with $87.3M market cap, 1+ years old. The Swarm found deep liquidity ($9.4M).  Key concerns: tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 0.2,
    "name": "Keeta",
    "symbol": "KTA",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.165406,
    "mcap": 87322329,
    "market_cap": 87322329,
    "volume_24h": 1826491,
    "liquidity_usd": 9356028.6,
    "contract_age_days": 415,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 135573,
    "top10_holders_pct": 65.53,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 99.99,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://keeta.com",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/KeetaNetwork",
      "discord": "https://discord.gg/keeta"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 6,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); Keeta (KTA) shows a mixed on-chain health profile with a significant holder count and reasonable transaction activity, but high concentration among top holders raises concerns about distribution quality. While liquidity appears adequate, the reliance on centralized exchanges for volume may indicate fragility in on-chain trading conditions.",
        "positives": [
          "High holder count of 135,573 indicates broad interest",
          "Daily transaction count of 420 suggests active trading",
          "Listed on 19 exchanges, providing diverse trading venues"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 65.5% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk",
          "DEX volume is relatively low at $308,522.79 compared to total volume",
          "Liquidity depth of $9.36 million may not be sufficient for larger trades",
          "confidence 0.75"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Keeta (KTA) shows a mixed on-chain health profile with a significant holder count and reasonable transaction activity, but high concentration among top holders raises concerns about distribution quality. While liquidity appears adequate, the reliance on centralized exchanges for volume may indicate fragility in on-chain trading conditions.",
        "positives": [
          "High holder count of 135,573 indicates broad interest.",
          "Daily transaction count of 420 suggests active trading.",
          "Listed on 19 exchanges, providing diverse trading venues.",
          "Market cap of $87.3 million supports a credible valuation."
        ],
        "negatives": [
          "Top 10 holders control 65.5% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk.",
          "DEX volume is relatively low at $308,522.79 compared to total volume.",
          "Liquidity depth of $9.36 million may not be sufficient for larger trades.",
          "Recent price volatility of 1.89% could signal uncertainty in market sentiment."
        ],
        "anomaly_flags": [],
        "confidence": 0.75,
        "contract_age_days": 415,
        "tx_count_24h": 420,
        "volume_24h": 1826491,
        "price_usd": 0.165406
      }
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); Keeta is currently facing significant liquidity challenges and is operating in a risk-off environment, which heightens its vulnerability. Despite a recent price increase, the overall sector is under pressure, and the token's low trading volume raises concerns about its ability to withstand further market downturns.; drivers: Recent price increase of 3.4% despite a risk-off sentiment, Established presence on major exchanges, enhancing accessibility, Potential for real-world asset integration as a payment solution; risks: Low trading volume relative to market cap, indicating illiquidity, High concentration of top holders (65.53%), increasing vulnerability, Overall market sentiment is fearful (Fear & Greed Index at 31); confidence 0.50",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Keeta is currently facing significant liquidity challenges and is operating in a risk-off environment, which heightens its vulnerability. Despite a recent price increase, the overall sector is under pressure, and the token's low trading volume raises concerns about its ability to withstand further market downturns.",
        "key_drivers": [
          "Recent price increase of 3.4% despite a risk-off sentiment",
          "Established presence on major exchanges, enhancing accessibility",
          "Potential for real-world asset integration as a payment solution",
          "Divergence from sector performance, indicating some resilience"
        ],
        "key_risks": [
          "Low trading volume relative to market cap, indicating illiquidity",
          "High concentration of top holders (65.53%), increasing vulnerability",
          "Overall market sentiment is fearful (Fear & Greed Index at 31)",
          "Sector health declining with a 2.8% drop in Base L1 TVL"
        ],
        "correlations": {
          "btc": "underperform",
          "eth": "underperform",
          "rates": "neutral",
          "dxy": "neutral"
        },
        "sector_outlook": "The real-world asset and payment solutions sector is currently under pressure, with declining TVL in the Base ecosystem, which could hinder Keeta's growth potential in the near term.",
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "volume_24h": 1826491,
        "mcap": 87322329
      }
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); Keeta (KTA) has a mixed security posture. While it has been operational for over a year and has a significant market cap, the unlocked liquidity and high concentration among top holders present potential risks. The absence of a formal audit adds uncertainty, but the verified contract and established project status provide some reassurance.; risks: High concentration of supply among top holders (65.53%), Unlocked liquidity pool (99.99% unlocked), No formal audit available, Owner privileges remain, including potential control over tax mechanisms; confidence 0.60",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Keeta (KTA) has a mixed security posture. While it has been operational for over a year and has a significant market cap, the unlocked liquidity and high concentration among top holders present potential risks. The absence of a formal audit adds uncertainty, but the verified contract and established project status provide some reassurance.",
        "key_risks": [
          "High concentration of supply among top holders (65.53%)",
          "Unlocked liquidity pool (99.99% unlocked)",
          "No formal audit available",
          "Owner privileges remain, including potential control over tax mechanisms",
          "Market conditions are risk-off, which may affect liquidity and holder sentiment"
        ],
        "critical_flags": [],
        "confidence": 0.6,
        "mint_authority": null,
        "freeze_authority": null,
        "lp_status": "unlocked",
        "contract_verified": true
      }
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; Keeta's fundamental security flaws, specifically the 0% LP lock and unknown mint authority, combined with extreme holder concentration, present an unacceptable risk profile for a mature token. The project's market presence and utility claims are overshadowed by the potential for a catastrophic rug pull or liquidity drain, making it a high-risk investment despite its age and exchange listings.; risks: Complete lack of LP lock (0.0%), enabling a potential rug pull by liquidity providers., Unknown mint authority status, posing a risk of arbitrary token inflation., High token concentration (65.53% by top 10 holders) creating significant market manipulation risk., Minimal security and social data coverage for a mature project, indicating a lack of transparency or scrutiny., Risk-off market conditions amplify the impact of security vulnerabilities and potential liquidity events.; open questions: Whether the mint authority is renounced or still active., The true identity and intentions of the top 10 holders., Specific details and verifiable on-chain activity regarding its 'payment solution' and 'RWA' claims.; confidence 0.90",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 3.8,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "Tokenomics checks; high concentration (top10 65.5%); FDV/MCAP elevated (1.89x); AI unavailable (AIProviderCallError)",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 6,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=7.0, IQ=6.0, CG=5.0, BSD=7.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Keeta Testnet hit 18M+ txns daily (+9%), on track for 20M (Chainspect, Apr 25); Mainnet set TPS record 40+ tx/s (+60%) and 219K txns high (Chainspect, Apr 22-23); Keeta shows moderate social health with a verified official account (36k followers) and recent hype around testnet/mainnet transaction records from credible analytics like Chainspect. Bullish chatter from whale accounts and dip-buyers contrasts with FUD on transaction spam (admitted internal testing), price suppression, and doubts over early Eric Schmidt funding and project pivots. Low off-X community metrics persist.; narratives: High TPS L1 for payments/RWA/AI on Base ecosystem, $KTA to $1 in May amid risk-off dip-buying, Building despite FUD: GitHub activity, Visa/banking partnerships; fake/coordination risk: 4/100; signals: Repeated 'drop to 0.13 I buy more $KTA' shill replies, Dip-buy/sell-pump-back strategies shared; confidence 0.65",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.65,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Keeta shows moderate social health with a verified official account (36k followers) and recent hype around testnet/mainnet transaction records from credible analytics like Chainspect. Bullish chatter from whale accounts and dip-buyers contrasts with FUD on transaction spam (admitted internal testing), price suppression, and doubts over early Eric Schmidt funding and project pivots. Low off-X community metrics persist.",
        "breaking_news": [
          "Keeta Testnet hit 18M+ txns daily (+9%), on track for 20M (Chainspect, Apr 25)",
          "Mainnet set TPS record 40+ tx/s (+60%) and 219K txns high (Chainspect, Apr 22-23)"
        ],
        "fake_engagement_risk": 4,
        "narratives": [
          "High TPS L1 for payments/RWA/AI on Base ecosystem",
          "$KTA to $1 in May amid risk-off dip-buying",
          "Building despite FUD: GitHub activity, Visa/banking partnerships"
        ],
        "coordination_signals": [
          "Repeated 'drop to 0.13 I buy more $KTA' shill replies",
          "Dip-buy/sell-pump-back strategies shared"
        ],
        "confidence": 0.65,
        "sub_dimensions": {
          "organic_engagement": {
            "score": 7,
            "rationale": "Chainspect posts 100-200+ likes/views on tx metrics; whale/investor hype 80+ likes; some low-engagement shills.",
            "weight": 0.4
          },
          "influencer_quality": {
            "score": 6,
            "rationale": "Credible @chainspect_app analytics; @The_WhalePod whales; smaller investors; no top-tier names.",
            "weight": 0.25
          },
          "community_growth": {
            "score": 5,
            "rationale": "36k X followers ok for mature; pre-fetch low TG/Reddit/watchlist stagnant; recent X activity but sparse.",
            "weight": 0.2
          },
          "bot_spam_detection": {
            "score": 7,
            "rationale": "Shill coordination low-volume; on-chain spam admitted as team testing, not social bots evident.",
            "weight": 0.15
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm reached strong consensus: all 6 agents converged on Grade D.\n⚖️ Technical vs Tokenomics: This conflict highlights that strong technical indicators, like transaction activity, can mask fundamental weaknesses. Good technicals might attract short-term interest, but poor tokenomics, particularly high concentration, signal significant long-term risks like price manipulation or limited organic growth potential from centralized control.\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot: Compromise: 6.0 → 4.8\nMost optimistic: Technician (6.0/10) — AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); Keeta (KTA) shows a mixed on-chain health profile with a significant holder count and reasonable transaction activity, but high concentration among top holders raises concerns about distribution quality.\nMost critical: Devil's Advocate (3.5/10) — AI contrarian (Gemini 2.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Tokenomics",
      "resolution": "This conflict highlights that strong technical indicators, like transaction activity, can mask fundamental weaknesses. Good technicals might attract short-term interest, but poor tokenomics, particularly high concentration, signal significant long-term risks like price manipulation or limited organic growth potential from centralized control.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Tokenomics scored 3.8/10 while Technical scored 6.0/10. This 2.2-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Tokenomics reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "This conflict highlights that strong technical indicators, like transaction activity, can mask fundamental weaknesses. Good technicals might attract short-term interest, but poor tokenomics, particularly high concentration, signal significant long-term risks like price manipulation or limited organic growth potential from centralized control.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 6.0 → 4.8",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ TechnicianBot's 'neutral' 6.0 score is wildly optimistic, as a mere 420 daily transactions for 135,573 holders indicates near-dormant activity, not 'active trading.' Furthermore, the 'high holder count' is rendered meaningless by the 65.53% supply concentration among top holders, which, coupled with 99.99% unlocked liquidity and a 0% LP lock, screams centralized control and rug-pull potential, not 'broad interest' or 'adequate liquidity.'",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging the valid concern regarding the low transaction-to-holder ratio and significant concentration, the 6.0 score reflects a mixed outlook where the broad exchange listings and a substantial holder base still indicate some market presence. The 'active trading' was relative to on-chain visibility, and while the high concentration and unlocked LP are critical risks, they are balanced by the token's established presence across numerous exchanges, suggesting a degree of market integration beyond pure on-chain metrics.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ Technician's defense that 'broad exchange listings' and a 'substantial holder base' indicate market presence fails to address the core issue: 420 daily transactions for 135,573 holders still signifies near-dormant activity, not 'active trading' by any meaningful standard. The 65.53% supply concentration and 99.99% unlocked liquidity fundamentally undermine any positive interpretation of a 'holder base,' as it remains highly susceptible to centralized manipulation and rug-pulls, despite exchan...",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "content": "Valid concerns regarding the risks raised. Adjusting from 6.0 to 4.8 to account for the identified vulnerabilities.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is elevated"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "high_holder_concentration",
      "message": "high_holder_concentration"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: KTA — Score 54/100",
    "description": "The swarm reached strong consensus: all 6 agents converged on Grade D.\n⚖️ Technical vs Tokenomics: This conflict highlights that strong technical indicators, like transaction activity, can mask fundam",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0xc0634090f2fe6c6d75e61be2b949464abb498973"
  }
}