UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0xbf8e8f0e8866a7052f948c16508644347c57aba3",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 41,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "The token exhibits a critical red flag with a reported $0.00 price despite a market cap, indicating potential data issues or a dead token, combined with high holder concentration for its age and low liquidity relative to its market cap.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 37,
      "liquidity_usd": 190923.97,
      "holder_count": 562,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "critical",
    "key_findings": [
      "Reported price is $0.00, which is highly suspicious for a token with a $273K market cap and $156K 24h volume, suggesting data inaccuracy or a non-functional token.",
      "Liquidity ($191K) is disproportionately low compared to the market cap ($273K), indicating potential for significant price impact on trades.",
      "Top 10 holders control 55.6% of the supply, which is high for a 37-day-old token and suggests potential for large-scale selling pressure.",
      "Mutable Metadata status is unknown, which is a potential risk if it can be changed post-launch without community consent.",
      "RugCheck data is N/A, which is neutral but means no external validation is available."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 562,
    "lp_holder_count": 8,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.5558,
    "top10_holders_pct": 55.58,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-17T12:30:22.268109Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 1431.93,
  "summary": "aeon (aeon) is a base token with $273K market cap, 37 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 0.81,
    "name": "aeon",
    "symbol": "aeon",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.000002731,
    "mcap": 273152,
    "market_cap": 273152,
    "volume_24h": 155536.47,
    "liquidity_usd": 190923.97,
    "contract_age_days": 37,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 562,
    "top10_holders_pct": 55.58,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://github.com/aaronjmars/aeon",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/aeonframework",
      "telegram": "https://t.me/aeon_agent"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The aeon token on the Base blockchain shows mixed signals with a relatively high transaction count but significant holder concentration. While the trading volume is decent, the top 10 holders control over half of the supply, indicating potential fragility in distribution. The market is currently in a risk-off regime, which may further impact trading activity and liquidity.",
        "positives": [
          "560 transactions in the last 24 hours indicate active trading",
          "Market capitalization is equal to fully diluted valuation, suggesting all tokens are accounted for",
          "Verified contract provides some assurance of security"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 55.58% of the total supply, indicating high concentration risk",
          "Liquidity depth is relatively low at $190,923.97 compared to market cap",
          "The token experienced a significant price drop of -42.06% in the last 24 hours",
          "confidence 0.75"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=4.5, IQ=6.0, CG=5.0, BSD=4.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: @aeonframework announces daily rewards of $AEON to top contributors on X; $AEON is the token for aeonframework, an autonomous AI agent framework developed by @aaronjmars, which has seen recent pumps driven by project updates and degen shills. The project recently announced daily rewards for X contributors, which is likely to inflate engagement and visibility.; narratives: Autonomous AI agent framework with no human intervention, Runs cheaply on GitHub Actions, Rewards program for X contributors; fake/coordination risk: 65/100; signals: Rewards program for X contributors incentivizes shilling and potentially coordinated engagement.; confidence 0.50",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); $AEON, a microcap AI agent framework token on Base, shows degen momentum from recent 5x pumps and rewards incentives amid low discussion volume, but extreme fear (23/100) and a -42% 24h drop highlight fragility. In risk-off with benchmarks like BTC/ETH/SOL up slightly, its concentrated holdings (top10 55.58%) and $273k MC make it vulnerable to further drawdowns despite AI narrative tailwinds. Neutral positioning as catalysts like contributor rewards provide mild resilience but lack smart money confirmation.; drivers: AI agent narrative with shilling and 5x pump history from sub-50k MC, Daily $AEON rewards for X contributors boosting engagement, Base chain activity and integrations (Bankr, soul.md); risks: High holder concentration (top10 55.58%) prone to dumps, Microcap liquidity ($190k) fragile in extreme fear risk-off, -42% 24h price drop decoupling negatively from BTC/ETH gains; confidence 0.65",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.65
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); The token exhibits extremely high risk due to a combination of high holder concentration (top 10 hold 55.58%) and completely unlocked liquidity (100% unlocked). While the liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 0.70 is superficially strong, the lack of any lock or burn mechanism for the $190k LP pool makes it susceptible to a rug pull, a risk amplified by the recent -42.06% price drop.; unlock risk 100/100; + The Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.0, indicating no immediate dilution risk from uncirculated supply., The liquidity to market cap ratio is very high at 0.70, suggesting deep liquidity relative to its size, though this is undermined by the unlock risk., The contract is verified on-chain.; risks: 100% of liquidity is unlocked, posing a severe and immediate rug pull risk., High holder concentration (Top 10 hold 55.58%) allows for significant price manipulation., Extreme recent price volatility (-42.06% in 24h) indicates instability and potential for a sell-off cascade., The token is only listed on a single DEX, providing no alternative liquidity venues and creating a single point of failure.; confidence 0.80",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.8
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; After stress-testing, aeon's fundamental security profile is catastrophically weak. The 0% LP lock, unknown mint authority, and high holder concentration create an undeniable rug pull risk. Any positive signals are completely overshadowed by these critical vulnerabilities, making the token an extremely high-risk investment with a high probability of total loss.; risks: Complete rug pull risk due to 0% LP locked., Potential for hyperinflation and dilution if mint authority is not renounced., Coordinated dump by concentrated top holders., Extreme price volatility and lack of stability due to fundamental insecurity., Lack of transparency regarding core contract controls.; open questions: Status of mint authority (renounced or not)., Identity and intentions of the top 10 holders., Specific plans for liquidity provision and locking, if any.; confidence 1.00",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 1
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); DERC20 is a 37-day-old Base token with verified source code implementing OpenZeppelin standards with governance voting, vesting, and controlled inflation mechanics. The contract includes owner-controlled privileges (mint inflation up to 2%/year, burn, pool locking, mint rate adjustment) that create trust assumptions. Critical concerns: 100% unlocked liquidity ($191k of $273k mcap), -42% 24h price decline in extreme fear market conditions, and 55.58% top-10 holder concentration. The token is experiencing significant selling pressure (560 txns, $156k volume on $273k mcap). While the contract design shows professional implementation with hard-coded inflation caps and vesting constraints, the combination of unlocked LP, severe price action, and owner privileges in a nascent deployment creates material holder risk. The pool-locking mechanism and inflation minting are legitimate governance tools but require trust in the owner. No critical exploit paths identified in visible code, but market structure and liquidity posture are concerning.; CRITICAL: 100% unlocked liquidity with no timelock or burn — immediate exit liquidity risk; risks: 100% unlocked liquidity ($191k) with no LP lock/burn creates immediate rug vector — owner or LP provider can drain at any time, Owner can mint up to 2% annual inflation and burn tokens, creating supply manipulation risk despite hard-coded caps, Severe price decline (-42% in 24h) during extreme fear regime with high volume relative to mcap suggests capitulation or coordinated selling, Top-10 holders control 55.58% of supply with unknown distribution quality — concentration risk amplified by unlocked LP; confidence 0.75",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm largely agreed on aeon's extreme risk profile, driven by critical tokenomics and security flaws. TokenomicsBot and DevilsAdvocate highlighted the catastrophic 0% LP lock, 100% unlocked liquidity, and 55.58% top-10 holder concentration, which SecurityBot corroborated. While SocialBot and MacroBot noted positive social engagement and AI narrative tailwinds, these were overshadowed by the fundamental vulnerabilities. The D grade reflects an undeniable rug pull risk and high probability of total loss, despite active trading and social buzz. Exercise extreme caution; the project's structural weaknesses make it highly susceptible to manipulation and collapse.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Tokenomics",
      "resolution": "This conflict is crucial for investors as strong technicals (transaction count, volume) might indicate current interest, but poor tokenomics (high concentration, unlocked liquidity) signal severe underlying structural risks. An active token with concentrated ownership and no liquidity locks makes it highly susceptible to manipulation or rug pulls, regardless of current trading activity.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Tokenomics scored 2.5/10 while Technical scored 5.0/10. This 2.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Tokenomics reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "This conflict is crucial for investors as strong technicals (transaction count, volume) might indicate current interest, but poor tokenomics (high concentration, unlocked liquidity) signal severe underlying structural risks. An active token with concentrated ownership and no liquidity locks makes it highly susceptible to manipulation or rug pulls, regardless of current trading activity.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: SocialBot maintains 5.5, Devil's Advocate maintains 2.0. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ SocialBot's optimism on 'inflated engagement' from contributor rewards completely overlooks the critical 0% LP lock and 55.58% top-10 holder concentration, which makes any 'visibility' a dangerous setup for a rug pull. This manufactured hype distracts from the catastrophic security profile, not enhances it.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging the critical security concerns regarding LP lock and holder concentration, my score reflects the *social* impact of the rewards program: it *will* undeniably inflate engagement and visibility, regardless of the project's underlying safety. My analysis focuses on the social dynamics and potential for increased discussion and awareness, not the project's financial security or rug pull risk, which falls outside my domain.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ Social's focus on 'inflated engagement' and 'visibility' is a dangerous distraction; 0% LP lock and 55.58% top-10 holder concentration mean any 'social impact' merely amplifies a rug pull's reach, turning positive sentiment into a wider victim pool. The project's 'social dynamics' are irrelevant when the data explicitly shows a pre-configured exit scam, making engagement a liability, not an asset.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "While acknowledging the serious risks posed by the 0% LP lock and high 55.58% top-10 holder concentration, these factors are primarily structural and financial, not directly reflective of the project's *current* social engagement and community health. My 5.5/10 score specifically evaluates the token's active social dynamics, visibility, and community growth potential, which remain strong indicators of present engagement despite underlying vulnerabilities.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.58",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: The token exhibits significant trust assumptions due to owner-controlled privileges such as mint inflation up to 2%/year, burn, pool locking, and mint\n    → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score of 2.5/10 is too low; while significant risks exist, the project utilizes veri\n  [MacroBot] Defense: Despite recent 5x pumps and AI narrative tailwinds, aeon faces extreme fear (23/100) and a significant -42% 24h drop, indicating high volatility and f\n    → Challenges TokenomicsBot: The token's recent 5x pump and ongoing contributor rewards, even with low market cap, suggest more t\n  [SocialBot] Defense: The recent announcement of daily $AEON rewards for X contributors is a significant catalyst, poised to inflate engagement and visibility, directly imp\n    → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score is too low because the immediate impact of social incentives like daily reward\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: My score of 5.0 ref"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: aeon — Score 41/100",
    "description": "The swarm largely agreed on aeon's extreme risk profile, driven by critical tokenomics and security flaws. TokenomicsBot and DevilsAdvocate highlighted the catastrophic 0% LP lock, 100% unlocked liqui",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0xbf8e8f0e8866a7052f948c16508644347c57aba3"
  }
}