33/100
GRADE F
DungeonClaw (DCLAW) is a base token with $67K market cap, 5 days old. Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.
LAYER 1
CAN IT GET OUT AT YOUR SIZE?
SOLANA EXIT SIMULATION
Solana exit simulation is returned only when a caller supplied trade intent. It is not available for other chains.
No Solana exit simulation was requested.
This report has no caller-supplied trade intent, so no route-specific sell test was returned.
LIQUIDITY EXPOSURE CAP
HARD BLOCKERS
HOLDER CLUSTERS
LAYER 2
WEIGHTED SUBSCORES
Score breakdown unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
LAYER 2
1 RETURNED CHECKS
LAYER 2
0 RETURNED POSITIONS
Analyst conclusions unavailable.
The agents key was not returned. This report does not reconstruct analyst positions from bot output.
LAYER 2
The dissent record stays visible whether the challenge changed the verdict, was withdrawn, or remained unresolved.
⚔️ TechnicianBot's 'neutral' score is dangerously naive; contract verification means little when 100% of its thin $44k liquidity is unlocked and 67% of the supply is controlled by just 10 wallets, creating an undeniable rug pull risk. 'Initial interest' from 372 holders is meaningless when the token's structure ensures they're at the mercy of a few whales, especially with a 22% price drop in 24 hours indicating crumbling confidence.
While acknowledging the severe rug pull risk from 67% whale concentration and unlocked liquidity, my 4.0/10 score already reflects these critical structural fragilities and the 22% price drop. The score isn't lower because the contract is verified, and the presence of 372 holders with 274 recent transactions indicates *some* technical activity, preventing an absolute zero, despite the high risk to these participants.
⚔️ Technician's 4.0/10 score still dangerously understates the risk; 'some technical activity' from 372 holders is irrelevant when 67% whale concentration and 100% unlocked $44k liquidity means whales can easily dump, making contract verification a moot point. The 22% price drop is just a preview of the inevitable rug pull, which 'some activity' or a verified contract won't prevent.
The confluence of 67% whale concentration combined with 100% unlocked liquidity, regardless of its size, significantly escalates the immediate dump risk, rendering other technical aspects less impactful on short-term stability.
LAYER 2
Market state unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
Data freshness unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
Lifecycle unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
Timing unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
LAYER 3
WINS AND MISSES STAY PUBLISHED
Too early to score this one.
The public ledger has not recorded a settled outcome for this receipt yet.
Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.
LAYER 3
{
"address": "0xb7965a38552e0f7d5b728bad1ef2817ca7ae0b68",
"chain": "base",
"depth": "full",
"tier": "FREE",
"score": 33,
"grade": "F",
"risk_level": "CRITICAL",
"flags": [
"high_holder_concentration"
],
"free_tier_result": {
"verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
"reason": "This is a very new token with high holder concentration and a significant portion of its market cap held by a few wallets, indicating potential for a rapid dump.",
"label": "AI Verdict",
"checks": {
"contract_verified": true,
"token_age_days": 5,
"liquidity_usd": 44848.29,
"holder_count": 372,
"has_liquidity_pool": true,
"chain": "base"
},
"risk_level": "high",
"key_findings": [
"Token is only 5 days old, making it extremely new and unproven.",
"Top 10 holders control 67.0% of the supply, which is very high for a token not explicitly designed for such concentration (e.g., treasury, staking pool).",
"Liquidity ($45K) is 67% of the market cap ($67K), which is relatively healthy, but the high concentration means a few large sells could severely impact it.",
"Mint and Freeze authorities are revoked, which is a positive security measure.",
"Low market cap ($67K) and low 24h volume ($38K) indicate a very small and illiquid market, susceptible to manipulation.",
"No protocol-controlled wallets in the top 10, meaning the concentration is purely individual/early investors."
],
"confidence": 0.9
},
"goplus": {
"source": "goplus",
"api_available": true,
"goplus_available": true,
"goplus_status_message": null,
"is_mintable": false,
"is_honeypot": false,
"holder_count": 372,
"lp_holder_count": 3,
"top_10_holder_rate": 0.6705,
"top10_holders_pct": 67.05,
"is_open_source": true,
"is_proxy": false,
"lp_burned_or_locked": null,
"security_findings": [
{
"source": "goplus",
"code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
"severity": "medium",
"message": "Top 10 holders concentration is elevated",
"value": 67.05
}
]
},
"security_findings": [
{
"source": "goplus",
"code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
"severity": "medium",
"message": "Top 10 holders concentration is elevated",
"value": 67.05
}
],
"scanned_at": "2026-04-19T22:29:33.381099Z",
"cached": false,
"cached_at": null,
"liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 336.36,
"summary": "DungeonClaw (DCLAW) is a base token with $67K market cap, 5 days old. Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
"token": {
"vol_liq_ratio": 0.86,
"name": "DungeonClaw",
"symbol": "DCLAW",
"chain": "base",
"price_usd": 6.748e-7,
"mcap": 67488,
"market_cap": 67488,
"volume_24h": 38451.8,
"liquidity_usd": 44848.29,
"contract_age_days": 5,
"contract_verified": true,
"holder_count": 372,
"top10_holders_pct": 67.05,
"holders_by_acquisition": null,
"holder_change_24h": null,
"holder_change_7d": null,
"holder_change_30d": null,
"holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
"exchange_wallet_pct": null,
"net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
"top_holders": null,
"top10_whale_pct": null,
"top10_protocol_pct": null,
"mint_authority": null,
"freeze_authority": null,
"mutable_metadata": null,
"lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
"lp_locked_pct": 0,
"lp_burned_pct": 0,
"lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
"lp_lock_expiry": null,
"lp_locker_name": null,
"social_links": {
"website": "https://www.dungeonclaw.com",
"twitter": "https://x.com/dungeonclawx402",
"telegram": "https://t.me/dungeonclaw",
"farcaster": "https://farcaster.xyz/dungeonclaw"
},
"creator_balance_pct": null,
"authority_governance": null,
"goplus_trusted": true,
"goplus_available": true,
"goplus_status_message": null,
"bundle_detected": false,
"is_honeypot": false
},
"bots": {
"TechnicianBot": {
"score": 4,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Technical",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); DungeonClaw exhibits signs of structural fragility due to high holder concentration and low transaction volume relative to its holder count. The liquidity is thin, and the significant price drop over the last 24 hours raises concerns about market confidence and execution quality.",
"positives": [
"Contract is verified, providing some assurance of legitimacy",
"Total holder count of 372 indicates initial interest",
"Recent transaction count of 274 suggests some level of activity"
],
"concerns": [
"Top 10 holders control 67.05% of the supply, indicating extreme concentration",
"24-hour trading volume of $38,451.80 is low compared to the holder count",
"Liquidity is thin at $44,848.29, raising concerns about execution quality",
"confidence 0.50"
],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.5,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "DungeonClaw exhibits signs of structural fragility due to high holder concentration and low transaction volume relative to its holder count. The liquidity is thin, and the significant price drop over the last 24 hours raises concerns about market confidence and execution quality.",
"positives": [
"Contract is verified, providing some assurance of legitimacy.",
"Total holder count of 372 indicates initial interest.",
"Recent transaction count of 274 suggests some level of activity.",
"Market cap is relatively low, which may allow for potential growth if conditions improve."
],
"negatives": [
"Top 10 holders control 67.05% of the supply, indicating extreme concentration.",
"24-hour trading volume of $38,451.80 is low compared to the holder count.",
"Liquidity is thin at $44,848.29, raising concerns about execution quality.",
"A significant price drop of -22.27% in the last 24 hours suggests market instability."
],
"anomaly_flags": [],
"confidence": 0.5,
"contract_age_days": 5,
"tx_count_24h": 274,
"volume_24h": 38451.8,
"price_usd": 6.748e-7
}
},
"DevilsAdvocate": {
"score": 1.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Contrarian",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; DungeonClaw presents an extremely high-risk profile due to severe tokenomics vulnerabilities. The overwhelming concentration of supply in a few hands, coupled with an unknown LP lock status, creates an immediate and undeniable rug pull risk that far outweighs any potential for organic growth. The token's nascent age does not excuse these fundamental security flaws.; risks: Catastrophic rug pull risk due to unknown LP lock and high holder concentration (67.05% by top 10)., Insider manipulation and potential for large-scale dumping by concentrated holders., Lack of transparency regarding project description, team, and mint authority., Low market cap ($67k) makes it highly susceptible to price volatility and manipulation., Risk-off market conditions amplify the danger of illiquid or vulnerable assets.; open questions: LP lock status (critical for liquidity safety)., Mint authority status (critical for supply control)., Project description and team identity.; confidence 0.95",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.95
},
"TokenomicsBot": {
"score": 2.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Tokenomics",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); The token exhibits a high-risk profile typical of nascent meme coins, characterized by extremely high holder concentration and fully unlocked liquidity. The top 10 holders control a concerning 67.05% of the supply, posing a significant risk of price manipulation and sell-offs. While the liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 0.665 is strong, the fact that 100% of this liquidity is unlocked presents a severe rug pull risk.; unlock risk 100/100; + The liquidity to market cap ratio is very high at 0.665, indicating deep liquidity relative to its current valuation., The Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.0, meaning there is no future dilution risk from uncirculated supply., The contract is verified, providing a basic level of transparency.; risks: 100% of liquidity is unlocked, creating a severe and immediate rug pull risk., Extreme supply concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 67.05%, enables price manipulation., The low holder count of 372 indicates a lack of broad distribution and community adoption., As a nascent meme coin with no clear utility or project description, it is highly speculative and vulnerable to market sentiment shifts.; confidence 0.80",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.8,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "The token exhibits a high-risk profile typical of nascent meme coins, characterized by extremely high holder concentration and fully unlocked liquidity. The top 10 holders control a concerning 67.05% of the supply, posing a significant risk of price manipulation and sell-offs. While the liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 0.665 is strong, the fact that 100% of this liquidity is unlocked presents a severe rug pull risk.",
"key_risks": [
"100% of liquidity is unlocked, creating a severe and immediate rug pull risk.",
"Extreme supply concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 67.05%, enables price manipulation.",
"The low holder count of 372 indicates a lack of broad distribution and community adoption.",
"As a nascent meme coin with no clear utility or project description, it is highly speculative and vulnerable to market sentiment shifts.",
"The 22% price drop in the last 24 hours suggests early holders may be taking profits, adding to sell pressure."
],
"positives": [
"The liquidity to market cap ratio is very high at 0.665, indicating deep liquidity relative to its current valuation.",
"The Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.0, meaning there is no future dilution risk from uncirculated supply.",
"The contract is verified, providing a basic level of transparency.",
"24-hour volume is substantial relative to market cap, suggesting active trading."
],
"unlock_risk": 100,
"distribution_assessment": "Distribution is extremely poor and centralized. With only 372 holders and the top 10 controlling over two-thirds of the supply, the token is highly susceptible to the actions of a few wallets. This level of concentration is dangerous even for a 5-day-old token, indicating a lack of organic distribution and a high potential for insider control.",
"comparable_models": {
"successful": [],
"failed": [
"Typical meme coins with high concentration and unlocked liquidity that fail within days."
]
},
"confidence": 0.8,
"mcap": 67488,
"fdv": 67488,
"mcap_fdv_ratio": 1,
"top10_holders_pct": 67.05,
"holder_count": 372,
"liquidity_usd": 44848.29,
"liquidity_mcap_ratio": 0.6645
}
},
"MacroBot": {
"score": 3,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Macro",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI macro (Grok); DungeonClaw, a nascent meme token on Base, is highly fragile in the current RISK_OFF regime marked by Fear & Greed at 27 and BTC/ETH down 2-4%, having dropped 22% in 24h versus benchmarks. Its tiny $67k MCAP, $44k liquidity, and 67% top-10 holder concentration expose it to sharp drawdowns and illiquidity squeezes, with memes broadly underperforming in risk-off. No token-specific catalysts or social momentum offset the sector's high-beta vulnerability and lack of established resilience.; drivers: Elevated 24h volume/MCAP at 0.6x signals relative activity for size, Base chain provides some L2 liquidity backdrop vs pure L1 memes, Contract verified reduces immediate rug risk; risks: Meme sector weak in risk-off with high BTC dom (57%) favoring bluechips, Extreme 24h underperformance (-22% vs BTC -2.4%) shows amplified downside beta, Low $44k liquidity and $67k MCAP highly vulnerable to further sentiment worsening; confidence 0.65",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.65,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "DungeonClaw, a nascent meme token on Base, is highly fragile in the current RISK_OFF regime marked by Fear & Greed at 27 and BTC/ETH down 2-4%, having dropped 22% in 24h versus benchmarks. Its tiny $67k MCAP, $44k liquidity, and 67% top-10 holder concentration expose it to sharp drawdowns and illiquidity squeezes, with memes broadly underperforming in risk-off. No token-specific catalysts or social momentum offset the sector's high-beta vulnerability and lack of established resilience.",
"key_drivers": [
"Elevated 24h volume/MCAP at 0.6x signals relative activity for size",
"Base chain provides some L2 liquidity backdrop vs pure L1 memes",
"Contract verified reduces immediate rug risk",
"Nascent age allows neutral scoring on missing social/exchange data"
],
"key_risks": [
"Meme sector weak in risk-off with high BTC dom (57%) favoring bluechips",
"Extreme 24h underperformance (-22% vs BTC -2.4%) shows amplified downside beta",
"Low $44k liquidity and $67k MCAP highly vulnerable to further sentiment worsening",
"67% top-10 concentration risks dumps on any profit-taking"
],
"correlations": {
"btc": "high beta, severe underperformance in drawdown",
"eth": "high beta as Base L2 token, ETH -3.9% dragged it harder",
"rates": "risk-off sensitive, higher yields pressure small caps",
"dxy": "USD strength exacerbates crypto outflows from illiquid memes"
},
"sector_outlook": "Meme tokens on L2s like Base are among the weakest in risk-off, lagging L1s/DeFi with poor downside protection and no TVL anchors.",
"confidence": 0.65,
"volume_24h": 38451.8,
"mcap": 67488
}
},
"SecurityBot": {
"score": 3.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Safety",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); DungeonClaw is a 5-day-old meme token on Base with verified source code implementing a custom Flaunch protocol memecoin contract. The contract includes privileged mint functionality callable by the Flaunch factory contract, metadata mutability, and crosschain bridge mint/burn capabilities. Critical concerns include 100% unlocked liquidity ($44.8k), concentrated holder distribution (top 10 control 67%), and a -22% 24h price decline in a risk-off market. The contract's mint function allows unlimited token creation by the Flaunch contract, which itself may have owner privileges not visible in this scan. While the code is verified and appears professionally written with OpenZeppelin patterns, the nascent age, unlocked LP, and privileged mint capability create material rug risk. The token's low market cap ($67k) and small holder base (372) provide minimal social constraint against exploitation.; CRITICAL: 100% unlocked liquidity with no lock or burn - immediate rug-pull capability, Unlimited mint authority held by external Flaunch contract with unknown governance; risks: Unlimited mint capability: The Flaunch contract can mint arbitrary tokens via the onlyFlaunch modifier, with no visible supply cap or time-lock constraints in the visible code, 100% unlocked liquidity: All $44.8k in liquidity is unlocked and can be withdrawn immediately, enabling instant rug-pull, Metadata mutability: Token name and symbol can be changed by the Flaunch contract at any time via setMetadata(), enabling potential scam pivots or confusion attacks, High holder concentration: Top 10 holders control 67% of supply in a 5-day-old token, creating significant dump risk and price manipulation vulnerability; confidence 0.72",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.72,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "DungeonClaw is a 5-day-old meme token on Base with verified source code implementing a custom Flaunch protocol memecoin contract. The contract includes privileged mint functionality callable by the Flaunch factory contract, metadata mutability, and crosschain bridge mint/burn capabilities. Critical concerns include 100% unlocked liquidity ($44.8k), concentrated holder distribution (top 10 control 67%), and a -22% 24h price decline in a risk-off market. The contract's mint function allows unlimited token creation by the Flaunch contract, which itself may have owner privileges not visible in this scan. While the code is verified and appears professionally written with OpenZeppelin patterns, the nascent age, unlocked LP, and privileged mint capability create material rug risk. The token's low market cap ($67k) and small holder base (372) provide minimal social constraint against exploitation.",
"key_risks": [
"Unlimited mint capability: The Flaunch contract can mint arbitrary tokens via the onlyFlaunch modifier, with no visible supply cap or time-lock constraints in the visible code",
"100% unlocked liquidity: All $44.8k in liquidity is unlocked and can be withdrawn immediately, enabling instant rug-pull",
"Metadata mutability: Token name and symbol can be changed by the Flaunch contract at any time via setMetadata(), enabling potential scam pivots or confusion attacks",
"High holder concentration: Top 10 holders control 67% of supply in a 5-day-old token, creating significant dump risk and price manipulation vulnerability",
"Flaunch factory dependency: Security posture depends entirely on the unseen Flaunch contract's access controls and owner privileges, which are not provided in this scan"
],
"critical_flags": [
"100% unlocked liquidity with no lock or burn - immediate rug-pull capability",
"Unlimited mint authority held by external Flaunch contract with unknown governance"
],
"confidence": 0.72,
"mint_authority": null,
"freeze_authority": null,
"lp_status": "unlocked",
"contract_verified": true
}
},
"SocialBot": {
"score": 3.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Social",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=3.0, IQ=3.0, CG=2.0, BSD=9.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Phantom and Rabby wallets now support DungeonClaw.; Dungeon runs launched with 413 USDC epoch pool.; DungeonClaw exhibits minimal Twitter activity centered on its official account promoting a Base chain dungeon game for humans and AI agents with USDC prizes. Low engagement on posts, sparse mentions by niche Base ecosystem accounts, no evident whale chatter or breaking hype. Fits nascent meme token profile with expected limited social footprint.; narratives: AI agentic gaming on Base, On-chain dungeon adventures with USDC rewards; fake/coordination risk: 2/100; confidence 0.65",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.65,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "DungeonClaw exhibits minimal Twitter activity centered on its official account promoting a Base chain dungeon game for humans and AI agents with USDC prizes. Low engagement on posts, sparse mentions by niche Base ecosystem accounts, no evident whale chatter or breaking hype. Fits nascent meme token profile with expected limited social footprint.",
"breaking_news": [
"Phantom and Rabby wallets now support DungeonClaw.",
"Dungeon runs launched with 413 USDC epoch pool."
],
"fake_engagement_risk": 1.5,
"narratives": [
"AI agentic gaming on Base",
"On-chain dungeon adventures with USDC rewards"
],
"confidence": 0.65,
"sub_dimensions": {
"organic_engagement": {
"score": 3,
"rationale": "Official posts receive 1-30 likes and low views; some replies to ecosystem threads but no viral spread.",
"weight": 0.4
},
"influencer_quality": {
"score": 3,
"rationale": "Mentions limited to small Base-focused accounts like WhaleAI and Tressi; no high-profile influencers.",
"weight": 0.25
},
"community_growth": {
"score": 2,
"rationale": "Sparse recent mentions since launch window; no growth signals evident.",
"weight": 0.2
},
"bot_spam_detection": {
"score": 9,
"rationale": "No patterns of spam, identical replies, or coordinated shilling observed.",
"weight": 0.15
}
}
}
}
},
"consensus_narrative": "The swarm unanimously agreed DungeonClaw presents an extremely high-risk profile, primarily due to severe tokenomics vulnerabilities and nascent market conditions. While TechnicianBot initially noted contract verification and some activity, Devil'sAdvocate, TokenomicsBot, and SecurityBot highlighted critical flaws like 100% unlocked liquidity and 67.05% holder concentration, leading to a compromised technical score. These data points, coupled with a 22% 24h price drop and a $67k market cap, drove the F grade, indicating a catastrophic rug pull risk. This grade means DungeonClaw is highly speculative and likely to result in significant capital loss. Avoid investment due to overwhelming rug pull potential and fundamental security flaws.",
"debates": [
{
"topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot",
"resolution": "Compromise: 4.0 → 2.8",
"outcome": "compromise",
"rounds": [
{
"phase": "challenge",
"agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
"agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
"target": "TechnicianBot",
"targetName": "Technician",
"content": "⚔️ TechnicianBot's 'neutral' score is dangerously naive; contract verification means little when 100% of its thin $44k liquidity is unlocked and 67% of the supply is controlled by just 10 wallets, creating an undeniable rug pull risk. 'Initial interest' from 372 holders is meaningless when the token's structure ensures they're at the mercy of a few whales, especially with a 22% price drop in 24 hours indicating crumbling confidence.",
"round": 1,
"stance": "challenge"
},
{
"phase": "defense",
"agent": "TechnicianBot",
"agentName": "Technician",
"target": "DevilsAdvocate",
"targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
"content": "While acknowledging the severe rug pull risk from 67% whale concentration and unlocked liquidity, my 4.0/10 score already reflects these critical structural fragilities and the 22% price drop. The score isn't lower because the contract is verified, and the presence of 372 holders with 274 recent transactions indicates *some* technical activity, preventing an absolute zero, despite the high risk to these participants.",
"round": 2,
"stance": "defend"
},
{
"phase": "rebuttal",
"agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
"agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
"target": "TechnicianBot",
"targetName": "Technician",
"content": "⚔️ Technician's 4.0/10 score still dangerously understates the risk; 'some technical activity' from 372 holders is irrelevant when 67% whale concentration and 100% unlocked $44k liquidity means whales can easily dump, making contract verification a moot point. The 22% price drop is just a preview of the inevitable rug pull, which 'some activity' or a verified contract won't prevent.",
"round": 3,
"stance": "escalate"
},
{
"phase": "resolution",
"agent": "TechnicianBot",
"agentName": "Technician",
"content": "The confluence of 67% whale concentration combined with 100% unlocked liquidity, regardless of its size, significantly escalates the immediate dump risk, rendering other technical aspects less impactful on short-term stability.",
"round": 4,
"stance": "compromise"
}
]
}
],
"upgrade_cta": false,
"warnings": [
{
"severity": "medium",
"code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
"message": "Top 10 holders concentration is elevated"
},
{
"severity": "medium",
"code": "high_holder_concentration",
"message": "high_holder_concentration"
}
],
"scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
"success": true,
"og": {
"title": "VerdictSwarm: DCLAW — Score 33/100",
"description": "The swarm unanimously agreed DungeonClaw presents an extremely high-risk profile, primarily due to severe tokenomics vulnerabilities and nascent market conditions. While TechnicianBot initially noted ",
"url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0xb7965a38552e0f7d5b728bad1ef2817ca7ae0b68"
}
}