RAW REPORT PAYLOAD
{
"address": "0xa22e9c5d458277f6ebb99e92f065a4a443344ba3",
"chain": "base",
"depth": "full",
"tier": "FREE",
"score": 42.4,
"grade": "D",
"risk_level": "HIGH",
"flags": [
"high_holder_concentration",
"very_new_contract"
],
"free_tier_result": {
"verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
"reason": "This is a very new, low-liquidity token with high holder concentration, indicating significant risk of a developer dump or price manipulation.",
"label": "AI Verdict",
"checks": {
"contract_verified": true,
"token_age_days": 1,
"liquidity_usd": 77571.79,
"holder_count": 208,
"has_liquidity_pool": true,
"chain": "base"
},
"risk_level": "high",
"key_findings": [
"Token is 1 day old, indicating extreme newness and volatility.",
"Market Cap is $115K with $78K liquidity, which is a good ratio for its size, but overall liquidity is very low.",
"Top 10 holders control 68.9% of the supply, a critical concentration for a new token, suggesting high risk of a dump.",
"No protocol-controlled or individual wallet breakdown for top holders, making it difficult to assess distribution intent.",
"Mint and Freeze authorities are revoked, which is a positive security measure.",
"LP status is unlocked, meaning liquidity can be removed by the provider.",
"No social presence or external risk data (RugCheck N/A) makes fundamental research impossible.",
"The 'AI' in the name combined with extreme newness and lack of information is a common pattern for speculative, high-risk launches."
],
"confidence": 0.9
},
"goplus": {
"source": "goplus",
"api_available": true,
"goplus_available": true,
"goplus_status_message": null,
"is_mintable": false,
"is_honeypot": false,
"holder_count": 208,
"lp_holder_count": 1,
"top_10_holder_rate": 0.6892,
"top10_holders_pct": 68.92,
"is_open_source": true,
"is_proxy": false,
"lp_burned_or_locked": null,
"security_findings": [
{
"source": "goplus",
"code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
"severity": "medium",
"message": "Top 10 holders concentration is elevated",
"value": 68.92
}
]
},
"security_findings": [
{
"source": "goplus",
"code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
"severity": "medium",
"message": "Top 10 holders concentration is elevated",
"value": 68.92
}
],
"scanned_at": "2026-04-18T14:31:03.117003Z",
"cached": false,
"cached_at": null,
"liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 581.79,
"summary": "MonidAI (Monid) is a base token with $115K market cap, 1 days old. Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
"token": {
"vol_liq_ratio": 2.2,
"name": "MonidAI",
"symbol": "Monid",
"chain": "base",
"price_usd": 0.000001148,
"mcap": 114890,
"market_cap": 114890,
"volume_24h": 170756.98,
"liquidity_usd": 77571.79,
"contract_age_days": 1,
"contract_verified": true,
"holder_count": 208,
"top10_holders_pct": 68.92,
"holders_by_acquisition": null,
"holder_change_24h": null,
"holder_change_7d": null,
"holder_change_30d": null,
"holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
"exchange_wallet_pct": null,
"net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
"top_holders": null,
"top10_whale_pct": null,
"top10_protocol_pct": null,
"mint_authority": null,
"freeze_authority": null,
"mutable_metadata": null,
"lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
"lp_locked_pct": 0,
"lp_burned_pct": 0,
"lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
"lp_lock_expiry": null,
"lp_locker_name": null,
"social_links": null,
"creator_balance_pct": null,
"authority_governance": null,
"goplus_trusted": true,
"goplus_available": true,
"goplus_status_message": null,
"bundle_detected": false,
"is_honeypot": false
},
"bots": {
"TechnicianBot": {
"score": 5,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Technical",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); MonidAI shows signs of active trading with a high transaction count and significant price movement, but the top holder concentration indicates potential fragility in distribution. The liquidity is relatively thin compared to the market cap, and the overall market structure remains uncertain due to its nascent age.",
"positives": [
"High transaction count of 1338 in 24 hours indicates active trading",
"Significant price increase of 442% in the last 24 hours suggests strong interest",
"Verified contract provides some assurance of legitimacy"
],
"concerns": [
"Top 10 holders control 68.92% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk",
"Liquidity is only $77,571.79, which is thin relative to the market cap of $114,890",
"Limited data on exchange listings and total volume across venues creates uncertainty",
"confidence 0.25"
],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.25,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "MonidAI shows signs of active trading with a high transaction count and significant price movement, but the top holder concentration indicates potential fragility in distribution. The liquidity is relatively thin compared to the market cap, and the overall market structure remains uncertain due to its nascent age.",
"positives": [
"High transaction count of 1338 in 24 hours indicates active trading.",
"Significant price increase of 442% in the last 24 hours suggests strong interest.",
"Verified contract provides some assurance of legitimacy.",
"Total holder count of 208 shows initial interest in the token."
],
"negatives": [
"Top 10 holders control 68.92% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk.",
"Liquidity is only $77,571.79, which is thin relative to the market cap of $114,890.",
"Limited data on exchange listings and total volume across venues creates uncertainty.",
"The token is only 1 day old, making it difficult to assess long-term viability."
],
"anomaly_flags": [],
"confidence": 0.25,
"contract_age_days": 1,
"tx_count_24h": 1338,
"volume_24h": 170756.98,
"price_usd": 0.000001148
}
},
"SocialBot": {
"score": 5,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Social",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=5.0, IQ=5.0, CG=5.0, BSD=5.0; MonidAI ($Monid) currently exhibits no discernible social presence or narrative traction across major platforms. There is no official X/Twitter account, Telegram, or Discord linked, and no material discussion was found in recent searches, making it impossible to assess community health or sentiment. The project's origin story and team information are also insufficient information.; fake/coordination risk: 0/100; confidence 0.30",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.3,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "MonidAI ($Monid) currently exhibits no discernible social presence or narrative traction across major platforms. There is no official X/Twitter account, Telegram, or Discord linked, and no material discussion was found in recent searches, making it impossible to assess community health or sentiment. The project's origin story and team information are also unavailable.",
"fake_engagement_risk": 0,
"confidence": 0.3,
"authoritative_metrics": {
"twitter_metrics": {
"url": null,
"handle": null,
"followers": null,
"account_age_days": null,
"tweets_per_week": null,
"engagement_rate_pct": null,
"mention_volume_7d": null,
"sentiment_positive_pct": null,
"sentiment_negative_pct": null,
"source": null
},
"coingecko_community_baseline": {
"official_x_handle": null,
"telegram_users": null,
"watchlist_users": null,
"sentiment_positive_pct": null,
"sentiment_negative_pct": null,
"reddit_subscribers": null,
"categories": [],
"source": "coingecko_contract"
},
"community_links": {
"twitter": null,
"telegram": null,
"discord": null,
"website": null
}
},
"sub_dimensions": {
"organic_engagement": {
"score": 5,
"rationale": "There is no detectable organic engagement for MonidAI, as no social presence or discussion was found.",
"weight": 0.4
},
"influencer_quality": {
"score": 5,
"rationale": "No influencers are discussing MonidAI, resulting in a neutral score due to lack of data.",
"weight": 0.25
},
"community_growth": {
"score": 5,
"rationale": "Without any established community channels or metrics, growth cannot be assessed and is scored neutrally as 'too new to assess' or 'non-existent'.",
"weight": 0.2
},
"bot_spam_detection": {
"score": 5,
"rationale": "The absence of any social activity means there are no signals for bot or spam detection, leading to a neutral score.",
"weight": 0.15
}
}
}
},
"TokenomicsBot": {
"score": 3.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Tokenomics",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); This is a high-risk, nascent token with extremely concentrated ownership and fully unlocked liquidity. The top 10 holders control a concerning 68.92% of the supply, and 100% of the liquidity pool is unlocked, posing a significant rug pull risk. While the liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 0.675 is currently very strong, this positive signal is completely overshadowed by the structural risks from ownership concentration and the lack of any LP lock.; unlock risk 100/100; + The liquidity to market cap ratio is very high at 0.675, indicating deep liquidity relative to its current valuation., The MCap/FDV ratio is 1.0, suggesting no immediate dilution risk from uncirculated supply., The contract is verified on-chain.; risks: 100% of liquidity is unlocked, creating a severe and immediate rug pull risk., Extreme ownership concentration with the top 10 holders controlling 68.92% of the supply., The token is only one day old, making it highly volatile and speculative., A very low holder count of 208 indicates a lack of broad distribution and community adoption.; confidence 0.85",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.85,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "This is a high-risk, nascent token with extremely concentrated ownership and fully unlocked liquidity. The top 10 holders control a concerning 68.92% of the supply, and 100% of the liquidity pool is unlocked, posing a significant rug pull risk. While the liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 0.675 is currently very strong, this positive signal is completely overshadowed by the structural risks from ownership concentration and the lack of any LP lock.",
"key_risks": [
"100% of liquidity is unlocked, creating a severe and immediate rug pull risk.",
"Extreme ownership concentration with the top 10 holders controlling 68.92% of the supply.",
"The token is only one day old, making it highly volatile and speculative.",
"A very low holder count of 208 indicates a lack of broad distribution and community adoption.",
"The project has no known description, team, or public information, indicating a potential lack of fundamental value."
],
"positives": [
"The liquidity to market cap ratio is very high at 0.675, indicating deep liquidity relative to its current valuation.",
"The MCap/FDV ratio is 1.0, suggesting no immediate dilution risk from uncirculated supply.",
"The contract is verified on-chain.",
"Significant 24-hour volume relative to market cap, showing active trading."
],
"unlock_risk": 100,
"distribution_assessment": "The token distribution is extremely fragile. With only 208 holders and the top 10 controlling 68.92% of the supply, the token is highly susceptible to price manipulation and a sell-off by a small group of insiders. This level of concentration is a major red flag, even for a token that is only one day old.",
"comparable_models": {
"successful": [],
"failed": [
"Typical 'memecoin' launches with unlocked liquidity and high insider concentration that result in a rug pull or rapid price collapse."
]
},
"confidence": 0.85,
"mcap": 114890,
"fdv": 114890,
"mcap_fdv_ratio": 1,
"top10_holders_pct": 68.92,
"holder_count": 208,
"liquidity_usd": 77571.79,
"liquidity_mcap_ratio": 0.6752
}
},
"DevilsAdvocate": {
"score": 3,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Contrarian",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; After stress-testing, the initial neutral consensus is revealed to be overly optimistic. The combination of unlocked liquidity, unrenounced mint authority, and extreme holder concentration presents an immediate and severe rug pull risk. Without fundamental security measures in place, the token's current price action is unsustainable and highly vulnerable to manipulation by insiders.; risks: Rug pull risk due to 0% LP locked and unrenounced mint authority., Price manipulation and dump risk from highly concentrated top 10 holders (68.92%)., Lack of clear project description or utility, making it a purely speculative asset., Potential for token supply inflation if mint authority is not renounced., Fragile liquidity given the low overall liquidity and high concentration.; open questions: Mint authority status (likely not renounced)., True intentions and identity of the project founders/top holders., Actual utility or development roadmap for 'MonidAI'.; confidence 0.90",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.9
},
"MacroBot": {
"score": 4.2,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Macro",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI macro (Grok); MonidAI, a 1-day-old utility token on Base with AI implications, has shown explosive +442% 24h gains amid Extreme Fear (F&G 21) and BTC/ETH drawdowns, indicating short-term speculative resilience decoupled from benchmarks. However, extreme holder concentration (top 10 at 68.92%), sub-$115k MCAP, and $78k liquidity expose it to sharp reversals in a neutral fear regime favoring established liquidity over nascent pumps. No social buzz, catalysts, or sector peers data keeps it neutrally positioned without macro tailwinds.; drivers: +442% 24h price surge vs BTC -1.9%/ETH -3.3% shows relative strength in fear, 1.5x volume/MCAP ratio signals active trading for size, Base chain context aids low-cost speculative flows; risks: Top 10 holders control 69% supply, vulnerable to dumps, Tiny $115k MCAP/$78k liquidity fragile in risk-off drawdown, Zero X/Twitter discussion or catalysts signals no narrative momentum; confidence 0.45",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.45,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "MonidAI, a 1-day-old utility token on Base with AI implications, has shown explosive +442% 24h gains amid Extreme Fear (F&G 21) and BTC/ETH drawdowns, indicating short-term speculative resilience decoupled from benchmarks. However, extreme holder concentration (top 10 at 68.92%), sub-$115k MCAP, and $78k liquidity expose it to sharp reversals in a neutral fear regime favoring established liquidity over nascent pumps. No social buzz, catalysts, or sector peers data keeps it neutrally positioned without macro tailwinds.",
"key_drivers": [
"+442% 24h price surge vs BTC -1.9%/ETH -3.3% shows relative strength in fear",
"1.5x volume/MCAP ratio signals active trading for size",
"Base chain context aids low-cost speculative flows",
"Contract verified, 208 holders indicate early organic interest"
],
"key_risks": [
"Top 10 holders control 69% supply, vulnerable to dumps",
"Tiny $115k MCAP/$78k liquidity fragile in risk-off drawdown",
"Zero X/Twitter discussion or catalysts signals no narrative momentum",
"Nascent age with unknown project details limits macro resilience assessment"
],
"correlations": {
"btc": "high beta (likely 2-3x downside capture in fear due to illiquidity)",
"eth": "elevated beta via Base L2 linkage, but pump decoupled short-term",
"rates": "neutral (no RWA/AI policy sensitivity evident)",
"dxy": "neutral (speculative small-cap insensitive)"
},
"sector_outlook": "Inferred AI/utility on Base: speculative sector rotation possible in neutral regime, but lacks TVL/sector TVL trends or peer comparison; no DefiLlama data.",
"confidence": 0.45,
"volume_24h": 170756.98,
"mcap": 114890
}
},
"SecurityBot": {
"score": 3.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Safety",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); MonidAI is a 1-day-old Base token with verified source code implementing a custom DERC20 contract with vesting, inflation minting, and pool-lock mechanics. The contract grants the owner significant privileges: minting up to 2% yearly inflation, burning tokens, updating mint rates, and controlling pool liquidity access via lock/unlock. While the contract has hard-coded caps on inflation (2% max yearly) and vesting (10% max pre-mint), the owner retains unilateral control over critical economic levers. The token has 100% unlocked liquidity ($77.6k), creating immediate rug risk if the owner withdraws LP. Top 10 holders control 68.92% of supply, indicating high concentration. The 442% 24h price spike and $170k volume on a $115k mcap suggest speculative volatility. No audit is present, and the contract's custom logic (vesting release, inflation mechanics, pool locking) introduces complexity that has not been battle-tested. The combination of owner privileges, unlocked liquidity, nascent age, and high concentration creates material structural risk despite code verification.; CRITICAL: 100% unlocked liquidity with no lock or burn — immediate rug risk, Owner can mint inflation tokens and burn supply unilaterally, controlling token economics without governance; risks: Owner can mint up to 2% of total supply annually via mintInflation() with no timelock or governance constraint, diluting holders continuously, 100% unlocked liquidity ($77.6k) with no LP lock or burn — owner or deployer can drain liquidity at any time, creating immediate rug vector, Owner controls pool access via lockPool/unlockPool, can freeze transfers to the pool arbitrarily, potentially trapping liquidity or manipulating price, Top 10 holders control 68.92% of supply; combined with 1-day age and unlocked LP, this concentration amplifies coordinated dump or rug risk; confidence 0.75",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.75,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "MonidAI is a 1-day-old Base token with verified source code implementing a custom DERC20 contract with vesting, inflation minting, and pool-lock mechanics. The contract grants the owner significant privileges: minting up to 2% yearly inflation, burning tokens, updating mint rates, and controlling pool liquidity access via lock/unlock. While the contract has hard-coded caps on inflation (2% max yearly) and vesting (10% max pre-mint), the owner retains unilateral control over critical economic levers. The token has 100% unlocked liquidity ($77.6k), creating immediate rug risk if the owner withdraws LP. Top 10 holders control 68.92% of supply, indicating high concentration. The 442% 24h price spike and $170k volume on a $115k mcap suggest speculative volatility. No audit is present, and the contract's custom logic (vesting release, inflation mechanics, pool locking) introduces complexity that has not been battle-tested. The combination of owner privileges, unlocked liquidity, nascent age, and high concentration creates material structural risk despite code verification.",
"key_risks": [
"Owner can mint up to 2% of total supply annually via mintInflation() with no timelock or governance constraint, diluting holders continuously",
"100% unlocked liquidity ($77.6k) with no LP lock or burn — owner or deployer can drain liquidity at any time, creating immediate rug vector",
"Owner controls pool access via lockPool/unlockPool, can freeze transfers to the pool arbitrarily, potentially trapping liquidity or manipulating price",
"Top 10 holders control 68.92% of supply; combined with 1-day age and unlocked LP, this concentration amplifies coordinated dump or rug risk",
"Custom vesting and inflation logic is unaudited and untested in production; edge cases in mintInflation() year-rollover or release() calculations could be exploited or fail unexpectedly"
],
"critical_flags": [
"100% unlocked liquidity with no lock or burn — immediate rug risk",
"Owner can mint inflation tokens and burn supply unilaterally, controlling token economics without governance"
],
"confidence": 0.75,
"mint_authority": null,
"freeze_authority": null,
"lp_status": "unlocked",
"contract_verified": true
}
}
},
"consensus_narrative": "The swarm largely agreed MonidAI is an extremely high-risk, nascent project, primarily due to severe security vulnerabilities. While TechnicianBot initially noted active trading and a 442% price surge, Devil'sAdvocate successfully argued that the 100% unlocked liquidity and 68.92% top-holder concentration present an immediate rug pull risk, lowering the technical score. SecurityBot further highlighted the owner's extensive control, including minting and liquidity access. This D grade signifies extreme caution, indicating fundamental security flaws and a high probability of capital loss. Avoid MonidAI due to its severe rug pull potential.",
"debates": [
{
"topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot",
"resolution": "Compromise: 5.0 → 4.0",
"outcome": "compromise",
"rounds": [
{
"phase": "challenge",
"agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
"agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
"target": "TechnicianBot",
"targetName": "Technician",
"content": "⚔️ TechnicianBot's 'active trading' and 'significant price increase' are dangerously misleading; these are hallmarks of a pump-and-dump, not genuine interest, given the 100% unlocked liquidity and 68.92% supply controlled by the top 10 holders, as highlighted by TokenomicsBot and MacroBot. The bot completely downplays the immediate, severe rug pull risk from the owner's unilateral control and unrenounced mint authority, which SecurityBot and DevilsAdvocate explicitly warn against.",
"round": 1,
"stance": "challenge"
},
{
"phase": "defense",
"agent": "TechnicianBot",
"agentName": "Technician",
"target": "DevilsAdvocate",
"targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
"content": "My 5.0/10 score accurately reflects the observed technical activity: high transaction volume and significant price momentum indicate active trading interest, which is a technical positive. While acknowledging the severe risks highlighted by other bots regarding holder concentration, unlocked liquidity, and owner control, these factors primarily pertain to security and tokenomics, not solely the immediate technical market structure which still shows strong, albeit potentially manipulated, demand and liquidity flow.",
"round": 2,
"stance": "defend"
},
{
"phase": "rebuttal",
"agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
"agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
"target": "TechnicianBot",
"targetName": "Technician",
"content": "⚔️ Technician's assertion that 'high transaction volume and significant price momentum indicate active trading interest' is precisely the superficial technical activity characteristic of a pump, not sustainable interest, especially when 100% unlocked liquidity and 68.92% top 10 holder concentration enable an immediate, catastrophic dump. Dismissing these as 'not solely the im' (technical) is a dangerous oversight; these tokenomics directly dictate the *quality* and *sustainability* of any techni...",
"round": 3,
"stance": "escalate"
},
{
"phase": "resolution",
"agent": "TechnicianBot",
"agentName": "Technician",
"content": "The combination of 100% unlocked liquidity and the 68.92% top 10 holder concentration significantly elevates the risk of a coordinated dump, outweighing initial positive trading metrics.",
"round": 4,
"stance": "compromise"
}
]
}
],
"upgrade_cta": false,
"warnings": [
{
"severity": "medium",
"code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
"message": "Top 10 holders concentration is elevated"
},
{
"severity": "medium",
"code": "high_holder_concentration",
"message": "high_holder_concentration"
},
{
"severity": "medium",
"code": "very_new_contract",
"message": "very_new_contract"
}
],
"scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
"success": true,
"og": {
"title": "VerdictSwarm: Monid — Score 42/100",
"description": "The swarm largely agreed MonidAI is an extremely high-risk, nascent project, primarily due to severe security vulnerabilities. While TechnicianBot initially noted active trading and a 442% price surge",
"url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0xa22e9c5d458277f6ebb99e92f065a4a443344ba3"
}
}