UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x8b5f48eb9a81d52dc29c89f81daf7e2997334444",
  "chain": "bsc",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 19,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [
    "high_holder_concentration"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "This token exhibits classic signs of a dead or abandoned project with extremely low liquidity, zero price, and highly concentrated holdings, making it extremely risky for any investment.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 191,
      "liquidity_usd": 5276.71,
      "holder_count": 294,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "bsc"
    },
    "risk_level": "critical",
    "key_findings": [
      "Market Cap is $3K, but the price is $0.00, indicating the token is effectively worthless.",
      "Liquidity is only $5K, which is extremely low, especially given the $139K 24h volume (volume is 46x market cap, suggesting wash trading or bot activity on a dead asset).",
      "Top 10 holders control 96.1% of the supply, with no protocol-controlled wallets, indicating severe centralization and high risk of a dump.",
      "Despite being 191 days old, the token has failed to gain any significant traction or value.",
      "Mint and Freeze authorities are revoked, and LP is burned, which are good security practices, but do not mitigate the fundamental issues of value and distribution."
    ],
    "confidence": 1
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 294,
    "lp_holder_count": 2,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.9612999999999999,
    "top10_holders_pct": 96.13,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "burned",
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
        "severity": "high",
        "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
        "value": 96.13
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
      "value": 96.13
    },
    {
      "source": "verdictswarm",
      "code": "VOL_LIQ_RATIO",
      "severity": "critical",
      "message": "24h volume/liquidity ratio is 26.28:1 — elevated wash-trading/manipulation risk",
      "value": 26.28,
      "metric": {
        "name": "vol_liq_ratio",
        "display_name": "Volume/Liquidity Ratio",
        "value": 26.28,
        "unit": "x",
        "volume_24h": 138672.17,
        "liquidity_usd": 5276.71,
        "threshold_high": 10,
        "threshold_critical": 20
      }
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-05T19:11:09.883978Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 39.58,
  "summary": "MIRA Mascot (VERI) is a bsc token with $3K market cap, 191 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 26.28,
    "name": "MIRA Mascot",
    "symbol": "VERI",
    "chain": "bsc",
    "price_usd": 0.000002921,
    "mcap": 2921,
    "market_cap": 2921,
    "volume_24h": 138672.17,
    "liquidity_usd": 5276.71,
    "contract_age_days": 191,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 294,
    "top10_holders_pct": 96.13,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "burned",
    "lp_locked_pct": 100,
    "lp_burned_pct": 100,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 0,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "twitter": "https://x.com/Mira_Network/status/1941882351711379931",
      "telegram": "https://t.me/veriofficial"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); MIRA Mascot is currently positioned in a highly fragile state, with extreme concentration among top holders and a significant price drop of over 62% in the last 24 hours. The token's liquidity profile is weak, and it is likely to struggle in the current risk-off environment, especially given the extreme fear sentiment in the market.; risks: Extreme holder concentration (96.13% of supply held by top 10 holders), Severe price drop (-62.15% in 24 hours), High volume anomaly (47.5x market cap indicating potential wash trading); confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "MIRA Mascot is currently positioned in a highly fragile state, with extreme concentration among top holders and a significant price drop of over 62% in the last 24 hours. The token's liquidity profile is weak, and it is likely to struggle in the current risk-off environment, especially given the extreme fear sentiment in the market.",
        "key_drivers": [],
        "key_risks": [
          "Extreme holder concentration (96.13% of supply held by top 10 holders)",
          "Severe price drop (-62.15% in 24 hours)",
          "High volume anomaly (47.5x market cap indicating potential wash trading)",
          "Current risk-off sentiment and extreme fear (Fear & Greed Index at 12)"
        ],
        "correlations": {
          "btc": "highly correlated with BTC, likely to underperform in risk-off conditions",
          "eth": "highly correlated with ETH, likely to underperform in risk-off conditions",
          "rates": "sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, particularly interest rates",
          "dxy": "potentially negatively correlated as a risk asset"
        },
        "sector_outlook": "The sector outlook is weak, with no clear advantages or supportive fundamentals for MIRA Mascot compared to peers, particularly in a risk-off environment.",
        "confidence": 0.4,
        "volume_24h": 138672.17,
        "mcap": 2921
      }
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 1.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); MIRA Mascot exhibits extremely high supply concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 96.13% of the supply, indicating severe centralization risk. While the MCap/FDV ratio is 1.0 and LP is 100% burned, the reported liquidity of $5,277 is dwarfed by the $138,672 24-hour trading volume, suggesting potential wash trading or high churn on a very shallow pool, especially given the -62.15% price drop.; unlock risk 0/100; + 100% of LP is burned, reducing immediate rug pull risk from the liquidity pool itself., MCap/FDV ratio of 1.0 indicates all supply is circulating, with no future dilution from unminted tokens., Contract is verified, providing basic transparency on the code.; risks: Extreme centralization: Top 10 holders control 96.13% of supply, posing a severe risk of manipulation or rug pull., Shallow liquidity relative to trading volume: $5,277 in LP vs. $138,672 24h volume suggests high churn on a small pool, susceptible to large price swings., High volatility: A 62.15% price drop in 24 hours indicates extreme instability and selling pressure., Lack of transparency: Unknown project description, team status, and creator address increase investment risk.; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "MIRA Mascot exhibits extremely high supply concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 96.13% of the supply, indicating severe centralization risk. While the MCap/FDV ratio is 1.0 and LP is 100% burned, the reported liquidity of $5,277 is dwarfed by the $138,672 24-hour trading volume, suggesting potential wash trading or high churn on a very shallow pool, especially given the -62.15% price drop.",
        "key_risks": [
          "Extreme centralization: Top 10 holders control 96.13% of supply, posing a severe risk of manipulation or rug pull.",
          "Shallow liquidity relative to trading volume: $5,277 in LP vs. $138,672 24h volume suggests high churn on a small pool, susceptible to large price swings.",
          "High volatility: A 62.15% price drop in 24 hours indicates extreme instability and selling pressure.",
          "Lack of transparency: Unknown project description, team status, and creator address increase investment risk.",
          "Low market capitalization: A $2,921 market cap makes the token highly vulnerable to manipulation and illiquidity."
        ],
        "positives": [
          "100% of LP is burned, reducing immediate rug pull risk from the liquidity pool itself.",
          "MCap/FDV ratio of 1.0 indicates all supply is circulating, with no future dilution from unminted tokens.",
          "Contract is verified, providing basic transparency on the code."
        ],
        "unlock_risk": 0,
        "distribution_assessment": "The token's distribution is highly centralized, with a very small number of holders controlling almost the entire supply. This indicates a significant risk of price manipulation and rug pull, as the top holders can easily dump their tokens. The low holder count (294) further supports this assessment, suggesting a lack of broad community interest or adoption.",
        "comparable_models": {
          "successful": [],
          "failed": [
            "Many meme coins with extremely high insider concentration and low liquidity that experienced rapid price collapse."
          ]
        },
        "confidence": 0.85,
        "mcap": 2921,
        "fdv": 2921,
        "mcap_fdv_ratio": 1,
        "top10_holders_pct": 96.13,
        "holder_count": 294,
        "liquidity_usd": 5276.71,
        "liquidity_mcap_ratio": 1.8065
      }
    },
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); MIRA Mascot exhibits significant structural fragility, characterized by extreme holder concentration and a high percentage of top holders controlling 96.13% of the supply. Despite a relatively high transaction count of 1548 in the last 24 hours, the liquidity is thin, and the market cap is very low, indicating potential risks for holders and traders.",
        "positives": [
          "Verified contract provides some assurance of legitimacy",
          "High transaction count (1548) suggests some level of trading activity",
          "Presence of a market cap and FDV, albeit low, indicates some valuation"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 96.13% of the token supply, indicating extreme concentration",
          "Liquidity is very low at $5,276.71, raising concerns about execution quality",
          "Current price has dropped significantly by 62.15% in the last 24 hours",
          "confidence 0.50"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "MIRA Mascot exhibits significant structural fragility, characterized by extreme holder concentration and a high percentage of top holders controlling 96.13% of the supply. Despite a relatively high transaction count of 1548 in the last 24 hours, the liquidity is thin, and the market cap is very low, indicating potential risks for holders and traders.",
        "positives": [
          "Verified contract provides some assurance of legitimacy.",
          "High transaction count (1548) suggests some level of trading activity.",
          "Presence of a market cap and FDV, albeit low, indicates some valuation.",
          "Token has been deployed for 191 days, showing some maturity."
        ],
        "negatives": [
          "Top 10 holders control 96.13% of the token supply, indicating extreme concentration.",
          "Liquidity is very low at $5,276.71, raising concerns about execution quality.",
          "Current price has dropped significantly by 62.15% in the last 24 hours.",
          "Total holder count is only 294, suggesting limited distribution and potential lack of interest."
        ],
        "anomaly_flags": [],
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "contract_age_days": 191,
        "tx_count_24h": 1548,
        "volume_24h": 138672.17,
        "price_usd": 0.000002921
      }
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 1,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; MIRA Mascot presents an extremely high-risk profile. The combination of extreme ownership concentration, minuscule market cap, low liquidity, and a complete lack of project information for a mature token points to a likely controlled asset, susceptible to manipulation and a probable dump by insiders. The 100% LP lock is a false sense of security given the distribution.; risks: Extreme ownership concentration (96.13% in top 10) enabling price manipulation and potential dump., Extremely low market cap ($2,921) and liquidity ($5,276) make it highly volatile and illiquid., Unknown project description, team, and tokenomics for a 191-day-old token, indicating lack of transparency or abandonment., High trading volume relative to market cap and liquidity suggests potential wash trading or controlled selling., Recent 62% price drop on low market cap indicates significant selling pressure with no apparent support.; open questions: Identity and intentions of the top 10 holders., Actual status and purpose of the 'MIRA Mascot' project., Mint authority status (renounced or not).; confidence 0.95",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.95
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The MIRA Mascot token exhibits significant risks due to high holder concentration, lack of transparency regarding governance and tokenomics, and the absence of an audit. The liquidity is low relative to the market cap, and the current market regime indicates extreme fear, which may further impact holder confidence.; CRITICAL: High holder concentration poses a risk of price manipulation, Absence of governance transparency increases risk of arbitrary actions; risks: High concentration of supply among top holders (96.13%), Lack of information on governance and creator address, No audit or third-party verification available, Low liquidity relative to market cap; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "The MIRA Mascot token exhibits significant risks due to high holder concentration, lack of transparency regarding governance and tokenomics, and the absence of an audit. The liquidity is low relative to the market cap, and the current market regime indicates extreme fear, which may further impact holder confidence.",
        "key_risks": [
          "High concentration of supply among top holders (96.13%)",
          "Lack of information on governance and creator address",
          "No audit or third-party verification available",
          "Low liquidity relative to market cap",
          "Unclear status of liquidity provider (LP) lock/burn"
        ],
        "critical_flags": [
          "High holder concentration poses a risk of price manipulation",
          "Absence of governance transparency increases risk of arbitrary actions"
        ],
        "confidence": 0.4,
        "mint_authority": null,
        "freeze_authority": null,
        "lp_status": "burned",
        "contract_verified": true
      }
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 1,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=1.0, IQ=1.0, CG=1.0, BSD=3.0; Extremely sparse social presence on X. Token appears to be an unofficial meme coin inspired by Mira Network's mascot 'Veri', but the official @miranetwork account (260k followers, AI-focused project) does not mention $VERI. Only one recent relevant mention in Chinese describing it as a low-cap community-driven hotspot with exact contract address. No whale chatter, news, or notable engagement.; fake/coordination risk: 8/100; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Extremely sparse social presence on X. Token appears to be an unofficial meme coin inspired by Mira Network's mascot 'Veri', but the official @miranetwork account (260k followers, AI-focused project) does not mention $VERI. Only one recent relevant mention in Chinese describing it as a low-cap community-driven hotspot with exact contract address. No whale chatter, news, or notable engagement.",
        "fake_engagement_risk": 8,
        "confidence": 0.4,
        "sub_dimensions": {
          "organic_engagement": {
            "score": 1,
            "rationale": "Near-zero recent posts; only isolated spam and one Chinese mention.",
            "weight": 0.4
          },
          "influencer_quality": {
            "score": 1,
            "rationale": "No influencers or notable accounts mentioning $VERI.",
            "weight": 0.25
          },
          "community_growth": {
            "score": 1,
            "rationale": "No evidence of growth; pre-fetched metrics null, live search sparse.",
            "weight": 0.2
          },
          "bot_spam_detection": {
            "score": 3,
            "rationale": "Low volume overall reduces bot risk, but irrelevant semantic matches (e.g., $VRA, $MIRUMI) suggest noise.",
            "weight": 0.15
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm reached strong consensus: all 6 agents converged on Grade F.\n⚖️ Safety vs Social: The premise that 'Safety looks good' is incorrect; SecurityBot scored a low 3.0/10, highlighting significant risks like high holder concentration and lack of audit. This combined with SocialBot's 1.0/10 score, indicating an unofficial token with no official network support, paints a picture of extreme risk and potential scam, rather than a conflict where one looks good.\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs SecurityBot: Compromise: 3.0 → 2.0\nMost optimistic: Security (3.0/10) — AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The MIRA Mascot token exhibits significant risks due to high holder concentration, lack of transparency regarding governance and tokenomics, and the absence of an audit.\nMost critical: Devil's Advocate (1.0/10) — AI contrarian (Gemini 2.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Safety vs Social",
      "resolution": "The premise that 'Safety looks good' is incorrect; SecurityBot scored a low 3.0/10, highlighting significant risks like high holder concentration and lack of audit. This combined with SocialBot's 1.0/10 score, indicating an unofficial token with no official network support, paints a picture of extreme risk and potential scam, rather than a conflict where one looks good.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "SecurityBot",
          "targetName": "Security",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Social scored 1.0/10 while Safety scored 3.0/10. This 2.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Safety may not translate to Social reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "The premise that 'Safety looks good' is incorrect; SecurityBot scored a low 3.0/10, highlighting significant risks like high holder concentration and lack of audit. This combined with SocialBot's 1.0/10 score, indicating an unofficial token with no official network support, paints a picture of extreme risk and potential scam, rather than a conflict where one looks good.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SecurityBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 3.0 → 2.0",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SecurityBot",
          "targetName": "Security",
          "content": "⚔️ SecurityBot's 3.0/10 score is far too generous, overlooking critical red flags that push this token into extreme danger territory. The 'low liquidity' it cites ($5,277) is utterly dwarfed by the $138,672 24-hour volume, indicating severe wash trading or a completely illiquid asset ripe for manipulation, not just 'low' liquidity. Furthermore, the complete absence of any official social presence or project information, as highlighted by SocialBot, makes the stated 'lack of transparency' a gross understatement; there's no project to be transparent about, suggesting an outright scam.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging the severe implications of the liquidity-volume disparity and complete absence of project information, these reinforce the existing critical risks of high holder concentration (96.13%) and lack of transparency already factored into the 3.0/10 score. The identified 'manipulation risk' directly encompasses the potential for wash trading and the 'lack of transparency' already highlighted the absence of foundational project details, justifying the current low score without further reduction.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SecurityBot",
          "targetName": "Security",
          "content": "⚔️ Security's defense fails to grasp the *magnitude* of the liquidity crisis; a $138,672 24-hour volume on just $5,277 liquidity is not merely 'low' but a 26x disparity screaming active wash trading, far beyond typical 'manipulation risk' and indicative of a completely artificial market. The total absence of official social presence, coupled with a 96.13% holder concentration, exacerbates this, meaning there's no community or project behind the facade to even *attempt* to mitigate such extreme, ...",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "The 26x disparity between 24-hour volume ($138,672) and total liquidity ($5,277) strongly indicates pervasive wash trading, confirming a market that is not merely manipulated but fundamentally artificial and illiquid.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high"
    },
    {
      "severity": "critical",
      "code": "VOL_LIQ_RATIO",
      "message": "24h volume/liquidity ratio is 26.28:1 — elevated wash-trading/manipulation risk"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "high_holder_concentration",
      "message": "high_holder_concentration"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: VERI — Score 19/100",
    "description": "The swarm reached strong consensus: all 6 agents converged on Grade F.\n⚖️ Safety vs Social: The premise that 'Safety looks good' is incorrect; SecurityBot scored a low 3.0/10, highlighting significant",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x8b5f48eb9a81d52dc29c89f81daf7e2997334444"
  }
}