39/100
GRADE F
WOON (WOON) is a base token with $1.4M market cap, 3 days old. Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.
LAYER 1
CAN IT GET OUT AT YOUR SIZE?
SOLANA EXIT SIMULATION
Solana exit simulation is returned only when a caller supplied trade intent. It is not available for other chains.
No Solana exit simulation was requested.
This report has no caller-supplied trade intent, so no route-specific sell test was returned.
LIQUIDITY EXPOSURE CAP
HARD BLOCKERS
HOLDER CLUSTERS
LAYER 2
WEIGHTED SUBSCORES
Score breakdown unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
LAYER 2
1 RETURNED CHECKS
LAYER 2
0 RETURNED POSITIONS
Analyst conclusions unavailable.
The agents key was not returned. This report does not reconstruct analyst positions from bot output.
LAYER 2
The dissent record stays visible whether the challenge changed the verdict, was withdrawn, or remained unresolved.
⚔️ TechnicianBot's 'trust' from a verified contract is naive when SecurityBot reveals the owner retains unconstrained power to mint inflation tokens and TokenomicsBot confirms a 0% LP lock, enabling a rug pull. Furthermore, 'nascent activity' is meaningless when MacroBot highlights extreme fragility in a risk-off market with no catalysts, and SocialBot notes sparse discussion with scam FUD.
My score of 5.0 already reflects significant technical concerns like high holder concentration and volatility, which are direct indicators of potential market instability and liquidity risks, aligning with rug pull potential. While SecurityBot and TokenomicsBot highlight critical security flaws, my 'verified contract' point refers to code transparency for technical analysis, not security guarantees. The observed 'nascent activity' is a factual technical observation of on-chain transactions, which, despite external market fragility and FUD, prevents an even lower score by indicating some organic market participation.
⚔️ Your 'verified contract' point, even if just for transparency, is fundamentally undermined by SecurityBot's data showing owner-minting capability and TokenomicsBot's 0% LP lock, which are direct, unmitigated rug pull vectors. These concrete, data-backed vulnerabilities far outweigh your general acknowledgment of 'significant technical concerns' and render your score overly optimistic given the immediate, existential threats identified.
The combination of owner-minting capability and a 0% LP lock, as highlighted by Devil's Advocate, presents concrete, unmitigated rug pull vectors that significantly increase risk beyond mere transparency concerns.
LAYER 2
Market state unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
Data freshness unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
Lifecycle unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
Timing unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
LAYER 3
WINS AND MISSES STAY PUBLISHED
Too early to score this one.
The public ledger has not recorded a settled outcome for this receipt yet.
Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.
LAYER 3
{
"address": "0x85eac631c800af804476b140f87039f742c28ba3",
"chain": "base",
"depth": "full",
"tier": "FREE",
"score": 39,
"grade": "F",
"risk_level": "CRITICAL",
"flags": [
"very_new_contract"
],
"free_tier_result": {
"verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
"reason": "This new token shows concerning signs of potential illiquidity and high concentration, typical of a pump-and-dump scheme, despite revoked mint/freeze authorities.",
"label": "AI Verdict",
"checks": {
"contract_verified": true,
"token_age_days": 3,
"liquidity_usd": 388646.06,
"holder_count": 1471,
"has_liquidity_pool": true,
"chain": "base"
},
"risk_level": "high",
"key_findings": [
"Token is very young (3 days old) with a relatively low market cap ($1.4M) and high trading volume ($841K), suggesting speculative activity.",
"Liquidity is $389K, which is only 27.8% of the market cap; this is insufficient for a token of this size and age, indicating potential for significant price impact on trades.",
"Top 10 holders control 57.9% of the supply, with 0% attributed to protocol-controlled wallets, meaning this concentration is entirely in individual hands.",
"The high concentration combined with low liquidity and young age presents a significant risk of a large holder dumping, which could crash the price.",
"Mint and Freeze authorities are revoked, which is a positive security feature, but does not mitigate the economic risks.",
"Mutable metadata status is unknown, which could allow for changes to the token's name or symbol post-launch."
],
"confidence": 0
},
"goplus": {
"source": "goplus",
"api_available": true,
"goplus_available": true,
"goplus_status_message": null,
"is_mintable": false,
"is_honeypot": false,
"holder_count": 1471,
"lp_holder_count": 11,
"top_10_holder_rate": 0.5788,
"top10_holders_pct": 57.88,
"is_open_source": true,
"is_proxy": false,
"lp_burned_or_locked": null,
"security_findings": [
{
"source": "goplus",
"code": "GOPLUS_OK",
"severity": "info",
"message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
}
]
},
"security_findings": [
{
"source": "goplus",
"code": "GOPLUS_OK",
"severity": "info",
"message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
}
],
"scanned_at": "2026-04-17T00:53:46.787755Z",
"cached": false,
"cached_at": null,
"liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 2914.85,
"summary": "WOON (WOON) is a base token with $1.4M market cap, 3 days old. Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
"token": {
"vol_liq_ratio": 2.16,
"name": "WOON",
"symbol": "WOON",
"chain": "base",
"price_usd": 0.00001435,
"mcap": 1378300,
"market_cap": 1378300,
"volume_24h": 841235,
"liquidity_usd": 388646.06,
"contract_age_days": 3,
"contract_verified": true,
"holder_count": 1471,
"top10_holders_pct": 57.88,
"holders_by_acquisition": null,
"holder_change_24h": null,
"holder_change_7d": null,
"holder_change_30d": null,
"holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
"exchange_wallet_pct": null,
"net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
"top_holders": null,
"top10_whale_pct": null,
"top10_protocol_pct": null,
"mint_authority": null,
"freeze_authority": null,
"mutable_metadata": null,
"lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
"lp_locked_pct": 0,
"lp_burned_pct": 0,
"lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
"lp_lock_expiry": null,
"lp_locker_name": null,
"social_links": {
"website": "https://woon.peaq.xyz/",
"twitter": "https://x.com/Woon_agent"
},
"creator_balance_pct": null,
"authority_governance": null,
"goplus_trusted": true,
"goplus_available": true,
"goplus_status_message": null,
"bundle_detected": false,
"is_honeypot": false
},
"bots": {
"TechnicianBot": {
"score": 5,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Technical",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The WOON token shows signs of nascent activity with a reasonable holder count and transaction volume for its age. However, the high concentration among top holders and significant price volatility raise concerns about liquidity durability and market stability.",
"positives": [
"Verified contract provides a level of trust",
"Relatively high transaction count (3163) for a 3-day-old token indicates some organic trading activity",
"Presence on two exchanges (Uniswap V4 and Matcha) enhances accessibility"
],
"concerns": [
"Top 10 holders control 57.88% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk",
"Liquidity is relatively thin at $388,646.06 compared to market cap, which may affect trading execution",
"24-hour price volatility of 23.49% suggests instability in market sentiment",
"confidence 0.75"
],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.75,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "The WOON token shows signs of nascent activity with a reasonable holder count and transaction volume for its age. However, the high concentration among top holders and significant price volatility raise concerns about liquidity durability and market stability.",
"positives": [
"Verified contract provides a level of trust.",
"Relatively high transaction count (3163) for a 3-day-old token indicates some organic trading activity.",
"Presence on two exchanges (Uniswap V4 and Matcha) enhances accessibility.",
"Market cap of $1.4M suggests potential for growth if liquidity improves."
],
"negatives": [
"Top 10 holders control 57.88% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk.",
"Liquidity is relatively thin at $388,646.06 compared to market cap, which may affect trading execution.",
"24-hour price volatility of 23.49% suggests instability in market sentiment.",
"Recent price decline of 24.75% indicates potential selling pressure."
],
"anomaly_flags": [],
"confidence": 0.75,
"contract_age_days": 3,
"tx_count_24h": 3163,
"volume_24h": 841235,
"price_usd": 0.00001435
}
},
"TokenomicsBot": {
"score": 3.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Tokenomics",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); WOON is a nascent meme token with a fragile structure. While it has a strong liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 28.2% and a healthy trading volume, its ownership is highly concentrated with the top 10 holders controlling 57.88% of the supply. The most significant risk is the completely unlocked liquidity pool, which exposes the project to a potential rug pull and undermines long-term stability.; unlock risk 100/100; + Strong liquidity relative to market cap (28.2% ratio)., High 24-hour trading volume ($841k) relative to market cap ($1.38M), indicating current trading interest., Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) equals Market Cap, meaning no immediate dilution risk from uncirculated supply.; risks: 100% of liquidity is unlocked, posing an extreme and immediate rug pull risk., High ownership concentration (57.88% in top 10 holders) creates significant manipulation and dump risk., The token is only 3 days old, making it highly speculative and volatile., As a meme token with no stated utility or project, its value is purely speculative and subject to rapid sentiment shifts.; confidence 0.85",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.85,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "WOON is a nascent meme token with a fragile structure. While it has a strong liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 28.2% and a healthy trading volume, its ownership is highly concentrated with the top 10 holders controlling 57.88% of the supply. The most significant risk is the completely unlocked liquidity pool, which exposes the project to a potential rug pull and undermines long-term stability.",
"key_risks": [
"100% of liquidity is unlocked, posing an extreme and immediate rug pull risk.",
"High ownership concentration (57.88% in top 10 holders) creates significant manipulation and dump risk.",
"The token is only 3 days old, making it highly speculative and volatile.",
"As a meme token with no stated utility or project, its value is purely speculative and subject to rapid sentiment shifts.",
"Limited venue breadth (only on Base DEXs) restricts access and concentrates risk."
],
"positives": [
"Strong liquidity relative to market cap (28.2% ratio).",
"High 24-hour trading volume ($841k) relative to market cap ($1.38M), indicating current trading interest.",
"Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) equals Market Cap, meaning no immediate dilution risk from uncirculated supply.",
"Contract is verified, providing a basic level of transparency."
],
"unlock_risk": 100,
"distribution_assessment": "Distribution is poor and top-heavy. With 1471 holders, the top 10 control a majority stake (57.88%), indicating significant insider control and high risk for smaller holders. This level of concentration is dangerous, even for a nascent token, as it creates an unstable market susceptible to manipulation and large-scale sell-offs by a few wallets.",
"comparable_models": {
"successful": [],
"failed": [
"Most early-stage meme tokens with unlocked liquidity and high insider concentration that fail within days or weeks."
]
},
"confidence": 0.85,
"mcap": 1378300,
"fdv": 1378300,
"mcap_fdv_ratio": 1,
"top10_holders_pct": 57.88,
"holder_count": 1471,
"liquidity_usd": 388646.06,
"liquidity_mcap_ratio": 0.282
}
},
"DevilsAdvocate": {
"score": 4,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Contrarian",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; WOON presents an extremely high-risk profile due to its 0% LP lock, unknown mint authority, and highly concentrated ownership. These factors, combined with its meme status and lack of utility, make it highly susceptible to manipulation or a rug pull, especially in a risk-off market. The current trading volume and holder count do not mitigate these fundamental security flaws.; risks: High risk of rug pull due to 0% LP lock and unknown mint authority status., Extreme price manipulation risk from top 10 holders controlling 57.88% of supply., Lack of project description or utility makes valuation purely speculative and highly volatile., Liquidity ($388k) is insufficient to absorb a significant sell-off from large holders., Risk-off market conditions amplify downside potential and liquidity concerns.; open questions: Status of mint authority (renounced or not)., Identity and intentions of the top 10 holders., True nature and purpose (if any) of the 'WOON' project.; confidence 0.90",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.9
},
"MacroBot": {
"score": 2.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Macro",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI macro (Grok); WOON, a 3-day-old meme token on Base, is highly fragile in the RISK_OFF regime with Extreme Fear (23/100), evidenced by -25% 24h drawdown and 23% 7d volatility while BTC is flat/up slightly and Base TVL stagnant—clear sector divergence. High top-10 concentration (58%) and modest $388K liquidity amplify downside vulnerability for this $1.4M mcap asset, with no offsetting catalysts, social buzz, or smart money signals. In risk-off, memes like WOON underperform benchmarks and peers, tracking high-beta dumps without resilience.; drivers: Volume/MCAP 0.6x elevated for nascent token, showing early activity, 1471 holders in 3 days indicates initial organic spread, Deployed on Base chain with verified contract and Uniswap V4 liquidity; risks: Top-10 holders control 57.88%, prone to coordinated dumps, Sharp -24.75% 24h / -20% 7d price action amid flat benchmarks, Meme sector highly beta-exposed in Extreme Fear risk-off; confidence 0.70",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.7,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "WOON, a 3-day-old meme token on Base, is highly fragile in the RISK_OFF regime with Extreme Fear (23/100), evidenced by -25% 24h drawdown and 23% 7d volatility while BTC is flat/up slightly and Base TVL stagnant—clear sector divergence. High top-10 concentration (58%) and modest $388K liquidity amplify downside vulnerability for this $1.4M mcap asset, with no offsetting catalysts, social buzz, or smart money signals. In risk-off, memes like WOON underperform benchmarks and peers, tracking high-beta dumps without resilience.",
"key_drivers": [
"Volume/MCAP 0.6x elevated for nascent token, showing early activity",
"1471 holders in 3 days indicates initial organic spread",
"Deployed on Base chain with verified contract and Uniswap V4 liquidity",
"FDV/MCAP 1.0x avoids dilution overhang"
],
"key_risks": [
"Top-10 holders control 57.88%, prone to coordinated dumps",
"Sharp -24.75% 24h / -20% 7d price action amid flat benchmarks",
"Meme sector highly beta-exposed in Extreme Fear risk-off",
"No token-specific catalysts, social presence, or X discourse (null intel)"
],
"correlations": {
"btc": "high beta; amplifies BTC sideways into downside fragility",
"eth": "elevated ETH/Base linkage; underperforms ETH's mild -0.7% drawdown",
"rates": "risk-off from rising yields crushes illiquid memes",
"dxy": "DXY strength exacerbates small-cap meme outflows"
},
"sector_outlook": "Base ecosystem TVL flat (0%) but memes diverging negatively; nascent memes lag L2 peers in risk-off, first to bleed liquidity.",
"confidence": 0.7,
"volume_24h": 841235,
"mcap": 1378300
}
},
"SocialBot": {
"score": 5,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Social",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=4.0, IQ=5.0, CG=5.0, BSD=7.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Recent pumps: +217% and +62% highlighted by gem research accounts.; WOON shows minimal but present social activity on X, primarily driven by gem callers highlighting recent price pumps amid market recovery. Official account exists with 1203 followers and peaq network ties, but discussion is sparse with some scam FUD. Expected for nascent meme token.; narratives: Peaq ecosystem AI agent meme, Base chain gainer during altseason signals; fake/coordination risk: 2/100; confidence 0.65",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.65,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "WOON shows minimal but present social activity on X, primarily driven by gem callers highlighting recent price pumps amid market recovery. Official account exists with 1203 followers and peaq network ties, but discussion is sparse with some scam FUD. Expected for nascent meme token.",
"breaking_news": [
"Recent pumps: +217% and +62% highlighted by gem research accounts."
],
"fake_engagement_risk": 2,
"narratives": [
"Peaq ecosystem AI agent meme",
"Base chain gainer during altseason signals"
],
"confidence": 0.65,
"sub_dimensions": {
"organic_engagement": {
"score": 4,
"rationale": "Sparse posts with low engagement (6-9 likes); recent pump mentions but no viral traction.",
"weight": 0.4
},
"influencer_quality": {
"score": 5,
"rationale": "Mentions from gem callers like WhaleAI (credible NFA group), but no high-profile influencers.",
"weight": 0.25
},
"community_growth": {
"score": 5,
"rationale": "1203 followers neutral for age; CG 25 watchlist low but expected; no growth metrics.",
"weight": 0.2
},
"bot_spam_detection": {
"score": 7,
"rationale": "No evident bot coordination or spam; scam claims appear individual users.",
"weight": 0.15
}
}
}
},
"SecurityBot": {
"score": 3.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Safety",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); WOON is a 3-day-old meme token on Base with verified source code implementing a custom DERC20 contract with vesting, inflation minting, and pool-lock mechanics. While the contract uses OpenZeppelin standards and includes safety caps (2% max yearly inflation, 10% max vesting), it presents multiple exploitable governance risks. The owner retains unconstrained power to mint inflation tokens (up to 2%/year), burn tokens from the owner address, adjust mint rates, and control pool liquidity access via lock/unlock mechanisms. Most critically, 100% of LP is unlocked with no burn or time-lock protection, creating immediate rug risk. The token has $1.4M mcap with $389k liquidity (28% liquidity ratio) and 1,471 holders, but top-10 concentration is 57.88%, indicating centralized distribution. The pool-lock feature—while potentially intended as a launch control—gives the owner unilateral power to freeze liquidity flows. For a nascent meme token in extreme fear market conditions, the combination of unlocked LP, owner mint authority, and pool control mechanisms creates material downside risk despite clean code structure.; CRITICAL: 100% unlocked LP with unknown custody — no burn, no time-lock, immediate exit liquidity for deployer, Owner retains mint authority (2%/year cap) and pool control (lock/unlock) — centralized failure points for a meme token; risks: 100% unlocked liquidity with no burn or time-lock — owner can drain LP at any time, creating immediate rug vector, Owner can mint up to 2% of supply annually via mintInflation() with no external governance or delay — dilution risk is capped but executable on-demand, Pool lock/unlock mechanism gives owner unilateral control over liquidity flows — can freeze transfers to pool, manipulating price or trapping holders, Top-10 holders control 57.88% of supply after only 3 days — extreme concentration risk with potential for coordinated dumps; confidence 0.78",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.78,
"structured_findings": {
"summary": "WOON is a 3-day-old meme token on Base with verified source code implementing a custom DERC20 contract with vesting, inflation minting, and pool-lock mechanics. While the contract uses OpenZeppelin standards and includes safety caps (2% max yearly inflation, 10% max vesting), it presents multiple exploitable governance risks. The owner retains unconstrained power to mint inflation tokens (up to 2%/year), burn tokens from the owner address, adjust mint rates, and control pool liquidity access via lock/unlock mechanisms. Most critically, 100% of LP is unlocked with no burn or time-lock protection, creating immediate rug risk. The token has $1.4M mcap with $389k liquidity (28% liquidity ratio) and 1,471 holders, but top-10 concentration is 57.88%, indicating centralized distribution. The pool-lock feature—while potentially intended as a launch control—gives the owner unilateral power to freeze liquidity flows. For a nascent meme token in extreme fear market conditions, the combination of unlocked LP, owner mint authority, and pool control mechanisms creates material downside risk despite clean code structure.",
"key_risks": [
"100% unlocked liquidity with no burn or time-lock — owner can drain LP at any time, creating immediate rug vector",
"Owner can mint up to 2% of supply annually via mintInflation() with no external governance or delay — dilution risk is capped but executable on-demand",
"Pool lock/unlock mechanism gives owner unilateral control over liquidity flows — can freeze transfers to pool, manipulating price or trapping holders",
"Top-10 holders control 57.88% of supply after only 3 days — extreme concentration risk with potential for coordinated dumps",
"Owner can burn tokens from owner address and adjust yearly mint rate (0-2%) without timelock — governance is fully centralized with no checks"
],
"critical_flags": [
"100% unlocked LP with unknown custody — no burn, no time-lock, immediate exit liquidity for deployer",
"Owner retains mint authority (2%/year cap) and pool control (lock/unlock) — centralized failure points for a meme token"
],
"confidence": 0.78,
"mint_authority": null,
"freeze_authority": null,
"lp_status": "unlocked",
"contract_verified": true
}
}
},
"consensus_narrative": "{\"analysis\": \"The VerdictSwarm largely agreed on WOON's extremely high-risk profile and fragility, primarily due to its nascent status and critical structural flaws. TokenomicsBot and DevilsAdvocate highlighted the 0% LP lock and 57.88% ownership concentration by the top 10 holders as major rug pull risks. SecurityBot further emphasized the owner's unconstrained power over minting and burning, while MacroBot noted its vulnerability in a risk-off market with a -25% 24h drawdown. Though TechnicianBot observed nascent activity, these severe risks, particularly the unlocked liquidity and governance issues, drove the F grade. This grade signifies WOON is highly speculative and likely to fail, posing substantial risk to investors. Exercise extreme caution and consider avoiding this token due to its inherent vulnerabilities.\"}",
"debates": [
{
"topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot",
"resolution": "Compromise: 5.0 → 4.5",
"outcome": "compromise",
"rounds": [
{
"phase": "challenge",
"agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
"agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
"target": "TechnicianBot",
"targetName": "Technician",
"content": "⚔️ TechnicianBot's 'trust' from a verified contract is naive when SecurityBot reveals the owner retains unconstrained power to mint inflation tokens and TokenomicsBot confirms a 0% LP lock, enabling a rug pull. Furthermore, 'nascent activity' is meaningless when MacroBot highlights extreme fragility in a risk-off market with no catalysts, and SocialBot notes sparse discussion with scam FUD.",
"round": 1,
"stance": "challenge"
},
{
"phase": "defense",
"agent": "TechnicianBot",
"agentName": "Technician",
"target": "DevilsAdvocate",
"targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
"content": "My score of 5.0 already reflects significant technical concerns like high holder concentration and volatility, which are direct indicators of potential market instability and liquidity risks, aligning with rug pull potential. While SecurityBot and TokenomicsBot highlight critical security flaws, my 'verified contract' point refers to code transparency for technical analysis, not security guarantees. The observed 'nascent activity' is a factual technical observation of on-chain transactions, which, despite external market fragility and FUD, prevents an even lower score by indicating some organic market participation.",
"round": 2,
"stance": "defend"
},
{
"phase": "rebuttal",
"agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
"agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
"target": "TechnicianBot",
"targetName": "Technician",
"content": "⚔️ Your 'verified contract' point, even if just for transparency, is fundamentally undermined by SecurityBot's data showing owner-minting capability and TokenomicsBot's 0% LP lock, which are direct, unmitigated rug pull vectors. These concrete, data-backed vulnerabilities far outweigh your general acknowledgment of 'significant technical concerns' and render your score overly optimistic given the immediate, existential threats identified.",
"round": 3,
"stance": "escalate"
},
{
"phase": "resolution",
"agent": "TechnicianBot",
"agentName": "Technician",
"content": "The combination of owner-minting capability and a 0% LP lock, as highlighted by Devil's Advocate, presents concrete, unmitigated rug pull vectors that significantly increase risk beyond mere transparency concerns.",
"round": 4,
"stance": "compromise"
}
]
}
],
"upgrade_cta": false,
"warnings": [
{
"severity": "info",
"code": "GOPLUS_OK",
"message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
},
{
"severity": "medium",
"code": "very_new_contract",
"message": "very_new_contract"
}
],
"scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
"success": true,
"og": {
"title": "VerdictSwarm: WOON — Score 39/100",
"description": "{\"analysis\": \"The VerdictSwarm largely agreed on WOON's extremely high-risk profile and fragility, primarily due to its nascent status and critical structural flaws. TokenomicsBot and DevilsAdvocate h",
"url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x85eac631c800af804476b140f87039f742c28ba3"
}
}