AVOID

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x844810406c9a8dd3ebeab658f526df0a3172aa1e",
  "chain": "ethereum",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 34.5,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [
    "very_new_contract"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "Brand new 1-day-old token with low liquidity and market cap presenting classic high-risk speculative characteristics despite revoked authorities.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": false,
      "token_age_days": 1,
      "liquidity_usd": 17040.09,
      "holder_count": 851,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "ethereum"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token age is only 1 day old, indicating a newly launched asset with high volatility risk",
      "Extremely low market cap of $109K and limited liquidity of $17K",
      "Mint and freeze authorities are safely revoked",
      "Top 10 holder concentration is relatively low at 23.4%"
    ],
    "confidence": 0.85
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 854,
    "lp_holder_count": 3,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.2341,
    "top10_holders_pct": 23.41,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "locked",
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-07-27T18:46:57.355093Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "action": "avoid",
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 127.8,
  "degraded_agents": [],
  "data_confidence": 0.52,
  "summary": "Catecoin (CATE) is a ethereum token with $109K market cap, 1 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, limited liquidity. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 1.63,
    "name": "Catecoin",
    "symbol": "CATE",
    "chain": "ethereum",
    "price_usd": 2.592e-13,
    "mcap": 108899,
    "market_cap": 108899,
    "volume_24h": 27716.95,
    "liquidity_usd": 17040.09,
    "contract_age_days": 1,
    "contract_verified": false,
    "holder_count": 851,
    "top10_holders_pct": 23.44,
    "holders_by_acquisition": {
      "swap": 290,
      "transfer": 4,
      "airdrop": 557
    },
    "holder_change_24h": 851,
    "holder_change_7d": 851,
    "holder_change_30d": 851,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": 23,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": 38,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": 57,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": 86,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": [
      {
        "address": "0xcb95fa63836f992b04d2e0599f519852e6970a8f",
        "balance": 32860043106815760,
        "pct_of_supply": 7.82,
        "label": "Contract holder"
      },
      {
        "address": "0xd8da6bf26964af9d7eed9e03e53415d37aa96045",
        "balance": 12598408472429750,
        "pct_of_supply": 3,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x54d1ebfd7963128682e1d81ff8c5118a22d4eeb0",
        "balance": 11560992945534128,
        "pct_of_supply": 2.75,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x7557c5c2a3350455288c7cdbc463c47c65f912f3",
        "balance": 7099116354859112,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.69,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0xc372c29054f7ffb5997426e6d208e3203c4cf4f5",
        "balance": 6368734924050590,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.52,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0xa731f124b5d5697648d324ef6b154dfff3879f10",
        "balance": 5847877464545024,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.39,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x1393dbc43fc06f593ed8ed7a65aa2118d3853f75",
        "balance": 5668170246066673,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.35,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x02f54c59e137353203ebbc6030807e8804d9862d",
        "balance": 5543349914347496,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.32,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x2ac52d9516a764b91573fdf757e301cba40a24f2",
        "balance": 5463183871697443,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.3,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0xe818502a591e587184307d2b79c59162551c3125",
        "balance": 5445524545184189,
        "pct_of_supply": 1.3,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      }
    ],
    "top10_whale_pct": 15.62,
    "top10_protocol_pct": 7.82,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "locked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 99,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 1,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": "UNCX",
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://cate.life/",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/Catecoincate",
      "telegram": "https://t.me/Catecoinmoon"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); Catecoin (CATE) is a nascent token with a mixed tokenomics profile. While it shows decent liquidity relative to its market cap and a significant portion of its LP is locked, the holder distribution is highly concentrated, and critical data points like creator share and all-venue volume are missing, making a definitive assessment challenging.; unlock risk 10/100; + High liquidity/MCap ratio (0.156) suggests good on-chain tradability for its current valuation., A significant portion of LP (99%) is locked via UNCX, reducing rug pull risk., FDV equals MCap, indicating all supply is currently circulating, which can reduce future dilution concerns.; risks: High holder concentration (top 100 holders own 86% of supply) poses significant centralization risk., Missing creator balance data prevents assessment of insider control., Lack of all-venue volume and exchange breadth makes it difficult to gauge true tradability beyond single-pair DEX., Nascent status means tokenomics are still unproven and highly susceptible to early market dynamics.; confidence 0.60",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 5.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The token shows some initial activity with a reasonable transaction count and holder base for its nascent age. However, the lack of verified contract status and incomplete liquidity data raises concerns about its structural integrity and long-term viability.",
        "positives": [
          "332 transactions in the last 24 hours indicating active trading",
          "851 holders suggesting initial interest and distribution",
          "Top 10 holders only control 23.4% of the supply, indicating moderate distribution"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Contract is unverified, raising concerns about security and trust",
          "Liquidity is relatively low at $17,040.09, which may affect trading execution",
          "Market cap is low at $108,899.00, indicating limited market presence",
          "confidence 0.50"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The token exhibits significant risks due to its nascent status, unverified contract, and lack of governance transparency. The liquidity pool is mostly locked, but the presence of a small percentage of unlocked liquidity raises concerns. Overall, the absence of audits and the lack of historical data contribute to a high-risk profile.; CRITICAL: Contract is unverified, which is a significant risk., No known governance structure or creator information available.; risks: Unverified contract raises concerns about potential vulnerabilities., Lack of governance transparency; creator information is unavailable., High concentration of holders indicates potential for manipulation., Liquidity pool has a small percentage (1%) unlocked, posing a risk of liquidity drain.; confidence 0.20",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.2
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=1.0, IQ=1.0, CG=1.0, BSD=8.0; Catecoin ($CATE) shows extremely low social activity and engagement on X/Twitter, with no recent posts or mentions detected for its official handle or contract. The lack of any discernible community discussion, influencer interest, or breaking news suggests a project with minimal current social relevance or organic momentum.; fake/coordination risk: 0/100; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); Catecoin is a 1-day-old Ethereum token with meme characteristics, showing healthy 0.3x volume/MCAP activity and rapid holder growth to 851 but operating in a neutral regime with Fear & Greed at 30. Its low liquidity ($17k) and high concentration make it vulnerable to any risk-off shift despite the 24h price spike. No sector-specific tailwinds offset the broad fear environment and lack of established catalysts.; drivers: 24h DEX volume at 0.3x MCAP indicating genuine trading interest, Rapid holder growth (+851 in 24h) with mixed acquisition via airdrop/swap, Neutral BTC/ETH price action providing no immediate downside pressure; risks: Extremely low liquidity ($17k) relative to MCAP exposing it to slippage in any drawdown, Top-100 holders control 86% of supply creating fragility to coordinated exits, Fear regime (30/100) favors established assets over nascent memes; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [BULL contrarian]; While the unverified contract remains a significant concern, the token exhibits stronger early-stage security and distribution than the bearish consensus suggests. The locked liquidity and moderate top-10 holder concentration indicate a more robust foundation than perceived, but the lack of verification prevents a higher score.; risks: Unverified contract, posing potential security vulnerabilities and trust issues., Lack of creator information and governance transparency., Low overall liquidity ($17k) makes it susceptible to price manipulation., Nascent status means long-term viability and development are unproven., Missing comprehensive market data (all-venue volume, exchange listings) limits true market assessment.; open questions: Mint authority status and upgrade authority status., Creator balance and vesting schedules., Future development plans and utility.; confidence 0.65",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.65
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The VerdictSwarm found Catecoin (CATE) to be an extremely high-risk, nascent token, reflected in its 3.5/10 F grade. While TechnicianBot noted some early on-chain activity and holder growth to 851, SecurityBot and TechnicianBot critically flagged the unverified contract as a major vulnerability. SocialBot confirmed extremely low social engagement, with no recent posts. The swarm agreed on significant security concerns and a lack of transparency, overshadowing any initial liquidity or volume metrics. This grade signifies that CATE presents substantial risk of financial loss due to unverified status and poor social traction. Avoid investment until critical security and transparency issues are resolved.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This conflict indicates a high-risk investment scenario where initial technical metrics might appear promising, but underlying security vulnerabilities could lead to significant financial loss. Investors face a dilemma where potential early gains are overshadowed by substantial rug pull or exploit risks due to the unverified contract and governance opacity, despite early transactional activity.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 2.0/10 while Technical scored 5.0/10. This 3.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This conflict indicates a high-risk investment scenario where initial technical metrics might appear promising, but underlying security vulnerabilities could lead to significant financial loss. Investors face a dilemma where potential early gains are overshadowed by substantial rug pull or exploit risks due to the unverified contract and governance opacity, despite early transactional activity.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TokenomicsBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 5.5 → 5.0",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TokenomicsBot",
          "targetName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "⚔️ TokenomicsBot's 5.5/10 is overly generous given the glaring red flags it acknowledges. The 'highly concentrated' holder distribution, coupled with missing 'creator share' and 'all-venue volume,' points to potential manipulation and lack of transparency, not a 'mixed profile.' Furthermore, the 'unlock risk 10/100' is a significant concern that it downplays, suggesting a high probability of future supply shocks.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "My score of 5.5/10 is justified because while I acknowledge the significant concerns regarding concentrated holder distribution and missing creator share, these are partially offset by the decent liquidity relative to market cap and the locked LP. The 'mixed profile' accurately reflects this balance of red flags and mitigating factors, preventing a lower score. The missing data points are indeed concerning, but the existing positive aspects prevent a harsher initial assessment.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TokenomicsBot",
          "targetName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "⚔️ Your defense leans on 'decent liquidity relative to market cap' and 'locked LP' as mitigating factors, but these are insufficient against the backdrop of a 'highly concentrated' holder distribution and missing creator share. High concentration fundamentally undermines the value of locked liquidity, as a few whales can still dictate price action, and the lack of creator transparency exacerbates this risk, making the 'unlock risk' even more potent regardless of current liquidity. This isn't a '...",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "The Devil's Advocate correctly highlighted that high holder concentration significantly diminishes the protective value of locked liquidity, as a few large holders could still manipulate the market despite the LP being locked.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Deadlock after 1 round(s), σ=1.02",
      "outcome": "deadlock"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: Catecoin exhibits a mixed tokenomics profile, with decent liquidity and locked LP, which are positive indicators. However, the highly concentrated hol\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 2.0 is too low; despite centralization concerns, the locked LP and decent liq\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 2.5 is also too low; while social sentiment and community engagement are import\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token's initial activity, including a decent transaction count and holder base for its age, suggests some early traction. However, the critical ab\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 2.0 is too low; while there are security concerns like the unverified contrac\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 2.5 is too low; despite potential social sentiment issues, the on-chain data in\n  [SocialBot] Defense: Catecoin ($CATE) exhibits extremely low social activity and engagemen"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "very_new_contract",
      "message": "very_new_contract"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: CATE — Score 34/100",
    "description": "The VerdictSwarm found Catecoin (CATE) to be an extremely high-risk, nascent token, reflected in its 3.5/10 F grade. While TechnicianBot noted some early on-chain activity and holder growth to 851, Se",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x844810406c9a8dd3ebeab658f526df0a3172aa1e"
  }
}