UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x7b0ee9dcb5c1d4d7cd630c652959951936512ba3",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 46,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "The swarm reached strong consensus: all 6 agents converged on Grade D.\n⚖️ Technical vs Safety: This conflict highlights a critical divergence between a token's current market activity and its underlying security vulnerabilities. While active trading might suggest investor interest, the severe safety concerns indicate a high risk of rug pulls or significant price manipulation by the owner, potentially leading to total loss despite perceived technical strength.\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot: Split verdict: SocialBot maintains 6.5, Devil's Advocate maintains 3.0. Both positions presented.\n⚖️ Score Calibration: Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.58\n⚖️ Peer Review: DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token's active trading volume and positive price movement in the last 24 hours indicate current market interest, but the high concentration of hol\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score is too low because the presence of active trading and a positive price change, e\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: My score of 5.8/10 reflects a balanced view, acknowledging the positive aspect of a fully diluted supply and relatively deep liquidity for its market \n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 3.0/10 is too low; while acknowledging the significant risks from high holder\n  [MacroBot] Defense: Delu's recent 117% price surge and active trading volume (0.8x market cap) on the Base blockchain clearly indicate strong speculative interest and liq\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's 3.0/10 score is too low, as the token's substantial trading volume and price increase \n  [SocialBot] Defense: Delu demonstrates stron\nMost optimistic: Social (5.5/10) — X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=5.\nMost critical: Devil's Advocate (3.0/10) — AI contrarian (Gemini 2.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 13,
      "liquidity_usd": 208537.49000000002,
      "holder_count": 791,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token is 13 days old, indicating a relatively new launch.",
      "Market Cap of $371K with $209K in liquidity, representing a very healthy 56.3% liquidity-to-market-cap ratio.",
      "Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are both revoked, eliminating critical central control risks.",
      "LP Status is unlocked, which is standard and expected for a decentralized token.",
      "Total Holders: 791, showing decent early adoption.",
      "Top 10 Concentration: 51.0%, which is acceptable for a new token, especially with 0% identified as protocol-controlled or individual wallets (implying a spread among early adopters/LPs).",
      "Social presence (website, twitter) indicates active project engagement.",
      "RugCheck data is N/A, which is neutral and expected for many tokens, especially newer ones or those not yet deeply indexed by all scanners."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 791,
    "lp_holder_count": 2,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.5095000000000001,
    "top10_holders_pct": 50.95,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-29T02:20:02.988708Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 1564.03,
  "summary": "Delu (Delu) is a base token with $371K market cap, 13 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, weak technical fundamentals. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 1.5,
    "name": "Delu",
    "symbol": "Delu",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.000003705,
    "mcap": 370594,
    "market_cap": 370594,
    "volume_24h": 312456.54,
    "liquidity_usd": 208537.49000000002,
    "contract_age_days": 13,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 791,
    "top10_holders_pct": 50.95,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://deluquant.com/",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/deluquant"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The Delu token shows signs of active trading with a significant number of transactions in the last 24 hours, but the high concentration among top holders raises concerns about distribution quality. While liquidity appears adequate for its age, the overall market structure remains fragile due to the young maturity of the token and the lack of broader venue data.",
        "positives": [
          "1844 transactions in the last 24 hours indicate active trading",
          "24-hour price change of +117.0% suggests strong short-term interest",
          "Verified contract provides some assurance of security"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 50.95% of the supply, indicating high concentration",
          "Total holder count of 791 is relatively low, suggesting limited distribution",
          "Missing data on total volume across all venues limits understanding of market depth",
          "confidence 0.50"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); Delu is a young meme token with a fully diluted supply (MCap/FDV ratio of 1.0) and relatively deep liquidity for its market cap (Liquidity/MCap ratio of 0.563). However, a significant portion of the supply (50.95%) is concentrated in the top 10 holders, and 100% of its liquidity pool is unlocked, posing a potential rug risk.; unlock risk 90/100; + Fully diluted supply (MCap/FDV ratio of 1.0) indicates no future dilution from token unlocks., Relatively deep liquidity for its market cap (Liquidity/MCap ratio of 0.563) provides good trading depth., Contract is verified, indicating basic transparency.; risks: High concentration in top 10 holders (50.95%) creates significant centralization risk., 100% of the liquidity pool is unlocked, posing a high risk of liquidity removal ('rug pull')., Lack of vesting schedules, emissions, or allocations means no structured long-term distribution plan., Absence of exchange breadth and all-venue volume data makes it difficult to assess true market depth beyond the single DEX pair.; confidence 0.75",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The Delu token exhibits significant risks due to its young age, high holder concentration, and unlocked liquidity pool. The owner retains substantial control over minting and pool management, which poses a threat to holder safety.; CRITICAL: Unlocked liquidity pool poses a risk of liquidity drain., High concentration of supply among top holders increases vulnerability to price manipulation.; risks: Owner can mint tokens at a maximum rate, potentially diluting existing holders., Liquidity pool is fully unlocked, allowing for potential liquidity drain., Top 10 holders control over 50% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk., No audit or third-party verification available, increasing uncertainty.; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; Despite its young age and recent price surge, Delu exhibits critical security vulnerabilities, primarily the 0% LP lock and high holder concentration, which expose investors to an immediate rug pull risk. The lack of clarity on mint authority further exacerbates this, making the token fundamentally unsound from a security perspective.; risks: 0% LP locked: The entire liquidity pool can be withdrawn by the deployer at any time, leading to an immediate rug pull., High holder concentration (50.95% by top 10): Significant portion of supply controlled by a few entities, enabling potential price manipulation or large-scale dumps., Mint authority unknown: If minting is still possible, the supply can be arbitrarily inflated, devaluing existing tokens., Lack of fundamental utility: As a meme coin, its value is purely speculative, making it highly susceptible to market sentiment and manipulation, especially with security flaws., Pump-and-dump potential: The recent +117% price surge combined with security vulnerabilities suggests a potential pump-and-dump scheme.; open questions: Status of mint authority (renounced or not)., Identity and intentions of the top 10 holders., Long-term plans for LP locking or security enhancements.; confidence 0.90",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); Delu, as a young meme token on the Base blockchain, is currently experiencing elevated trading volume relative to its market cap, indicating active interest. However, its significant holder concentration and the overall neutral market regime contribute to a balanced outlook, with potential fragility if risk sentiment worsens.; drivers: Strong 24-hour price increase (+117%) indicating speculative interest., Active trading volume (0.8x market cap) suggests liquidity support., Deployment on Base blockchain may attract niche community interest.; risks: High concentration of top holders (50.95%) raises vulnerability to sell-offs., Lack of established market presence and exchange listings may limit growth., Current market sentiment is fearful, which can lead to volatility.; confidence 0.50",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 5.5,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=5.0, IQ=7.0, CG=6.0, BSD=8.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: +117% 24h price surge to $370k MC with $312k volume; Record net inflows (~82k) signaling real demand vs volume noise; Young Base token ($Delu) showing promising social health with an active official account posting real-time quant scans, positive shills from Base influencers highlighting its self-evolving AI agent utility, and momentum from a +117% 24h pump. Credible solo dev David Tomu with prior successes. Limited but organic engagement fits maturity tier.; narratives: Self-evolving onchain AI quant agent, Autonomous trading with real USDC swaps and self-funded compute, Base ecosystem utility play post-hackathon; fake/coordination risk: 2/100; signals: Mentions of community cabals forming (@jackonmyt), Cross-shills with dev's prior token $checkr; confidence 0.75",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm reached strong consensus: all 6 agents converged on Grade D.\n⚖️ Technical vs Safety: This conflict highlights a critical divergence between a token's current market activity and its underlying security vulnerabilities. While active trading might suggest investor interest, the severe safety concerns indicate a high risk of rug pulls or significant price manipulation by the owner, potentially leading to total loss despite perceived technical strength.\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot: Split verdict: SocialBot maintains 6.5, Devil's Advocate maintains 3.0. Both positions presented.\n⚖️ Score Calibration: Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.58\n⚖️ Peer Review: DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token's active trading volume and positive price movement in the last 24 hours indicate current market interest, but the high concentration of hol\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score is too low because the presence of active trading and a positive price change, e\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: My score of 5.8/10 reflects a balanced view, acknowledging the positive aspect of a fully diluted supply and relatively deep liquidity for its market \n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 3.0/10 is too low; while acknowledging the significant risks from high holder\n  [MacroBot] Defense: Delu's recent 117% price surge and active trading volume (0.8x market cap) on the Base blockchain clearly indicate strong speculative interest and liq\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's 3.0/10 score is too low, as the token's substantial trading volume and price increase \n  [SocialBot] Defense: Delu demonstrates stron\nMost optimistic: Social (5.5/10) — X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=5.\nMost critical: Devil's Advocate (3.0/10) — AI contrarian (Gemini 2.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between a token's current market activity and its underlying security vulnerabilities. While active trading might suggest investor interest, the severe safety concerns indicate a high risk of rug pulls or significant price manipulation by the owner, potentially leading to total loss despite perceived technical strength.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 3.0/10 while Technical scored 5.0/10. This 2.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between a token's current market activity and its underlying security vulnerabilities. While active trading might suggest investor interest, the severe safety concerns indicate a high risk of rug pulls or significant price manipulation by the owner, potentially leading to total loss despite perceived technical strength.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: SocialBot maintains 6.5, Devil's Advocate maintains 3.0. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ SocialBot's 'promising social health' and 'self-evolving AI agent utility' are marketing fluff, completely overshadowed by the 0% LP lock and 50.95% top-10 holder concentration. This isn't 'real demand'; it's a setup for a rug pull, irrespective of any 'credible solo dev' or temporary price pump.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "My score reflects strong social indicators like record net inflows signaling genuine community interest, active official accounts posting utility-driven content, and positive shills from Base influencers, which are not 'marketing fluff' but observable social engagement. While acknowledging the valid financial risks (0% LP lock, high concentration), these are outside my social analysis purview; my 6.5 score specifically assesses the token's current social health and narrative traction, which remain promising despite financial vulnerabilities.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ While 'record net inflows' and 'positive shills' might indicate temporary hype, they are precisely the 'marketing fluff' that attracts liquidity for a rug pull, especially given the 0% LP lock. The acknowledged 50.95% top-10 holder concentration combined with an unlocked LP fundamentally undermines any claims of 'genuine community interest' by enabling a swift exit at the expense of those inflows.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "While the 0% LP lock and 50.95% top-10 concentration are significant risks, the 'record net inflows' and 'positive shills' are not solely marketing fluff, but rather reflect genuine, albeit potentially speculative, community engagement and liquidity growth. My score balances these risks against the project's demonstrated ability to attract capital and attention, suggesting a current market perception that warrants a moderate score despite underlying vulnerabilities.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.58",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token's active trading volume and positive price movement in the last 24 hours indicate current market interest, but the high concentration of hol\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score is too low because the presence of active trading and a positive price change, e\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: My score of 5.8/10 reflects a balanced view, acknowledging the positive aspect of a fully diluted supply and relatively deep liquidity for its market \n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 3.0/10 is too low; while acknowledging the significant risks from high holder\n  [MacroBot] Defense: Delu's recent 117% price surge and active trading volume (0.8x market cap) on the Base blockchain clearly indicate strong speculative interest and liq\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's 3.0/10 score is too low, as the token's substantial trading volume and price increase \n  [SocialBot] Defense: Delu demonstrates stron"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: Delu — Score 46/100",
    "description": "The swarm reached strong consensus: all 6 agents converged on Grade D.\n⚖️ Technical vs Safety: This conflict highlights a critical divergence between a token's current market activity and its underlyi",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x7b0ee9dcb5c1d4d7cd630c652959951936512ba3"
  }
}