61/100
GRADE C
VaderAI by Virtuals (VADER) is a well-established base token with $2.5M market cap, 1+ years old. The swarm found a balanced risk-reward profile with no extreme outliers. Overall verdict: C — moderate risk — proceed with caution.
LAYER 1
CAN IT GET OUT AT YOUR SIZE?
SOLANA EXIT SIMULATION
Solana exit simulation is returned only when a caller supplied trade intent. It is not available for other chains.
No Solana exit simulation was requested.
This report has no caller-supplied trade intent, so no route-specific sell test was returned.
LIQUIDITY EXPOSURE CAP
HARD BLOCKERS
No blocker data returned.
Not returned for this report.
HOLDER CLUSTERS
LAYER 2
WEIGHTED SUBSCORES
Score breakdown unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
LAYER 2
1 RETURNED CHECKS
LAYER 2
0 RETURNED POSITIONS
Analyst conclusions unavailable.
The agents key was not returned. This report does not reconstruct analyst positions from bot output.
LAYER 2
The dissent record stays visible whether the challenge changed the verdict, was withdrawn, or remained unresolved.
⚔️ TokenomicsBot's claim of 'robust' liquidity and '0/100 unlock risk' is dangerously misleading, as SecurityBot and TechnicianBot explicitly state liquidity is 'fully unlocked' and 'somewhat limited,' posing a significant rug pull risk. Furthermore, the 'high holder count' doesn't negate the 'fragility in distribution' from 37.46% top 10 holder control, which could easily be dumped given the unlocked liquidity.
My 7.8/10 score is justified by the 1.008 MCap/FDV, confirming minimal token unlock risk (0/100) as nearly all supply is circulating, not future token unlocks. While top 10 holders control 37.46%, the extremely high holder count of 229,482 indicates broad distribution beyond them, mitigating concentration risk. The 15.3% liquidity across 5 venues, while 'fully unlocked' (meaning no future *protocol* liquidity unlocks), is robust relative to market cap, making a rug pull harder than implied by 'somewhat limited' which is a subjective assessment.
⚔️ The 1.008 MCap/FDV only confirms *future* unlock risk is low, not the immediate rug pull risk from the 37.46% top 10 holder control, especially with 'fully unlocked' liquidity. This concentrated supply, coupled with 'somewhat limited' liquidity across just 5 venues, creates a significant vulnerability for rapid price manipulation or exit, despite the high holder count.
While acknowledging the 37.46% top 10 holder concentration and 'somewhat limited' liquidity as valid concerns for immediate volatility, the 1.008 MCap/FDV indicates near-full circulation, significantly mitigating future dilution and providing a stable foundation. This, combined with a positive price trend and decent liquidity volume, supports the overall 7.8 score despite concentration risks.
Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.67
DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES: [SocialBot] Defense: The recent launch of Season 5 with a substantial $VADER reward pool and a clear campaign timeline acts as a significant short-to-medium term catalyst, [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token exhibits a broad holder base and contract maturity, suggesting a degree of stability, yet the concentrated top 10 holdings and limited liqui → Challenges TokenomicsBot: The token's significant holder concentration and limited liquidity depth introduce fundamental risks [SecurityBot] Defense: The presence of owner privileges, which allow for potential manipulation of the token supply, combined with fully unlocked liquidity, presents signifi → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score is too high because it appears to overlook the critical security implications [MacroBot] Defense: VaderAI (VADER) operates in a risk-off macro environment with significant liquidity challenges and a bearish AI sector trend, which fundamentally limi
LAYER 2
Market state unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
Data freshness unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
Lifecycle unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
Timing unavailable.
Not returned for this report.
LAYER 3
WINS AND MISSES STAY PUBLISHED
Too early to score this one.
The public ledger has not recorded a settled outcome for this receipt yet.
Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.
LAYER 3
{
"address": "0x731814e491571a2e9ee3c5b1f7f3b962ee8f4870",
"chain": "base",
"depth": "full",
"tier": "FREE",
"score": 60.6,
"grade": "C",
"risk_level": "MEDIUM",
"flags": [],
"free_tier_result": {
"verdict": "UNKNOWN",
"reason": "6 agents analyzed this token. Devil's Advocate was the lone dissenter (scored 3.5/10 vs swarm average 5.6).\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs TokenomicsBot: Split verdict: TokenomicsBot maintains 7.8, Devil's Advocate maintains 3.5. Both positions presented.\n⚖️ Score Calibration: Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.67\n⚖️ Peer Review: DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n [SocialBot] Defense: The recent launch of Season 5 with a substantial $VADER reward pool and a clear campaign timeline acts as a significant short-to-medium term catalyst,\n [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token exhibits a broad holder base and contract maturity, suggesting a degree of stability, yet the concentrated top 10 holdings and limited liqui\n → Challenges TokenomicsBot: The token's significant holder concentration and limited liquidity depth introduce fundamental risks\n [SecurityBot] Defense: The presence of owner privileges, which allow for potential manipulation of the token supply, combined with fully unlocked liquidity, presents signifi\n → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score is too high because it appears to overlook the critical security implications \n [MacroBot] Defense: VaderAI (VADER) operates in a risk-off macro environment with significant liquidity challenges and a bearish AI sector trend, which fundamentally limi\n \nMost optimistic: Tokenomics (7.0/10) — AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.\nMost critical: Devil's Advocate (3.5/10) — AI contrarian (Gemini 2.",
"label": "AI Verdict",
"checks": {
"contract_verified": true,
"token_age_days": 561,
"liquidity_usd": 376104.81,
"holder_count": 229482,
"has_liquidity_pool": true,
"chain": "base"
},
"risk_level": "medium",
"key_findings": [
"Token is 561 days old, indicating longevity beyond typical rug pulls.",
"Mint authority is revoked, preventing arbitrary token inflation.",
"Freeze authority is revoked, preventing token freezing by contract owner.",
"Liquidity of $376K is healthy for a $2.5M market cap (15% of MCAP).",
"Total holders are very high at 229,482, indicating broad distribution and adoption.",
"Top 10 concentration is low at 37.5%, with no identified protocol-controlled wallets, suggesting organic distribution.",
"LP is unlocked, which is standard for a decentralized token.",
"Social presence (website, twitter, telegram) exists, indicating an active project."
],
"confidence": 0.95
},
"goplus": {
"source": "goplus",
"api_available": true,
"goplus_available": true,
"goplus_status_message": null,
"is_mintable": false,
"is_honeypot": false,
"holder_count": 229482,
"lp_holder_count": 10,
"top_10_holder_rate": 0.3746,
"top10_holders_pct": 37.46,
"is_open_source": true,
"is_proxy": false,
"lp_burned_or_locked": null,
"security_findings": [
{
"source": "goplus",
"code": "GOPLUS_OK",
"severity": "info",
"message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
}
]
},
"security_findings": [
{
"source": "goplus",
"code": "GOPLUS_OK",
"severity": "info",
"message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
}
],
"scanned_at": "2026-05-16T22:52:14.925453Z",
"cached": false,
"cached_at": null,
"liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 2820.79,
"summary": "VaderAI by Virtuals (VADER) is a well-established base token with $2.5M market cap, 1+ years old. The swarm found a balanced risk-reward profile with no extreme outliers. Overall verdict: C — moderate risk — proceed with caution.",
"token": {
"vol_liq_ratio": 0.2,
"name": "VaderAI by Virtuals",
"symbol": "VADER",
"chain": "base",
"price_usd": 0.00245911,
"mcap": 2451090,
"market_cap": 2451090,
"volume_24h": 74301,
"liquidity_usd": 376104.81,
"contract_age_days": 561,
"contract_verified": true,
"holder_count": 229482,
"top10_holders_pct": 37.46,
"holders_by_acquisition": null,
"holder_change_24h": null,
"holder_change_7d": null,
"holder_change_30d": null,
"holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
"holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
"exchange_wallet_pct": null,
"net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
"top_holders": null,
"top10_whale_pct": null,
"top10_protocol_pct": null,
"mint_authority": null,
"freeze_authority": null,
"mutable_metadata": null,
"lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
"lp_locked_pct": 0,
"lp_burned_pct": 0,
"lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
"lp_lock_expiry": null,
"lp_locker_name": null,
"social_links": {
"website": "https://vaderai.ai/",
"twitter": "https://x.com/Vader_AI_",
"telegram": "https://t.me/vader_AI_community"
},
"creator_balance_pct": null,
"authority_governance": null,
"goplus_trusted": true,
"goplus_available": true,
"goplus_status_message": null,
"bundle_detected": false,
"is_honeypot": false
},
"bots": {
"TechnicianBot": {
"score": 6.5,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Technical",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); VaderAI (VADER) shows a reasonably healthy on-chain structure with a significant holder base and moderate trading activity. However, the top 10 holders' concentration indicates potential fragility in distribution, and the liquidity depth is somewhat limited, which could affect execution quality in risk-off conditions.",
"positives": [
"229,482 total holders indicating a broad distribution base",
"Contract is verified and has been active for 561 days, showing maturity",
"24-hour trading volume of $74,301 across multiple venues suggests reasonable interest"
],
"concerns": [
"Top 10 holders own 37.5% of the supply, indicating potential concentration risk",
"Liquidity depth of $376,104.81 may be insufficient for larger trades",
"Recent price decline of 31.31% over the past week raises concerns about market sentiment",
"confidence 0.70"
],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.7
},
"MacroBot": {
"score": 5,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Macro",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI macro (Grok); VaderAI (VADER) is currently positioned in a risk-off environment, facing liquidity challenges and a bearish sector trend. While the recent launch of Season 5 and the associated reward pool provide some bullish sentiment, the overall market conditions and low trading volume suggest fragility in its current setup.; drivers: Launch of Season 5 with a significant reward pool, Positive community engagement around AI and robotics narrative, Accumulation signals from ecosystem commentators; risks: Low liquidity and trading volume raise fragility concerns, Sector health declining with a 1.5% drop in AI TVL, Market sentiment remains fearful (Fear & Greed Index at 31); confidence 0.50",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.5
},
"SecurityBot": {
"score": 6,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Safety",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The VaderAI token has a mixed security posture. While it has been active for over a year and has a significant market cap, the unlocked liquidity and the presence of owner privileges raise concerns about potential risks to holders. The lack of a formal audit and the unknown status of the liquidity lock further contribute to uncertainty.; risks: Owner privileges allow for potential manipulation of the token supply., Liquidity is fully unlocked, posing a risk of sudden market impact., No formal audit available, increasing the risk of undiscovered vulnerabilities., Top 10 holders control a significant portion of the supply (37.46%), indicating potential centralization risks.; confidence 0.60",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.6
},
"SocialBot": {
"score": 5.8,
"sentiment": "neutral",
"category": "Social",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=5.5, IQ=6.5, CG=6.0, BSD=7.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Season 5 live with 250,000 $VADER reward pool and 7-week campaign ending June 15, 2026; VaderAI ($VADER) is building infrastructure for physical AI agents and robotics within the Virtuals/Base ecosystem, leveraging a reward-driven data contribution model. The recent launch of Season 5 with a substantial reward pool is a key catalyst, driving mild bullish sentiment despite questions about long-term reward sustainability. While some smart money accumulation is noted, comprehensive on-chain data is missing.; narratives: AI agents for physical robotics and data contribution, Virtuals ecosystem expansion on Base, Reward-driven community data loops; fake/coordination risk: 30/100; confidence 0.65",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.65
},
"TokenomicsBot": {
"score": 7,
"sentiment": "bullish",
"category": "Tokenomics",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); VADER exhibits a healthy circulating supply with an MCap/FDV ratio of 1.008, indicating minimal future dilution risk. Liquidity is robust at 15.3% of market cap across 5 venues, supporting a $2.4M valuation. While top 10 holders control 37.46%, the very high holder count of 229,482 suggests broad distribution, especially considering the exclusion of known protocol infrastructure from concentration metrics.; unlock risk 0/100; + MCap/FDV ratio of 1.008 indicates virtually all supply is circulating, minimizing future dilution risk., Deep liquidity (15.3% of market cap) and strong exchange breadth (5 venues) provide good tradability and price stability., Very high holder count (229,482) suggests broad retail distribution, despite moderate top 10 concentration.; risks: LP is 100% unlocked, posing potential rug pull or liquidity removal risk, although the presence on multiple CEXs mitigates this somewhat., Lack of specific vesting schedules or emissions data means future supply dynamics beyond current FDV/MCap are not fully transparent., Project description is inferred, and team status is unknown, leading to potential governance and development uncertainty., The high holder count for a relatively small market cap could indicate many inactive or dust wallets, potentially inflating the perceived distribution breadth.; confidence 0.80",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.8
},
"DevilsAdvocate": {
"score": 3.5,
"sentiment": "bearish",
"category": "Contrarian",
"reasoning": {
"summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; Despite its age and some positive engagement, VADER exhibits critical, unaddressed security flaws that make it a high-risk asset. The combination of 0% LP lock, unconfirmed mint authority, and concentrated ownership creates an unacceptable rug pull vector. The swarm's neutral assessment fails to adequately weigh these fundamental risks.; risks: Rug pull risk due to 0% LP lock, allowing liquidity to be withdrawn at any time., Potential for infinite inflation/dilution if mint authority is not renounced (implied by 'unknown' status for a mature token)., High concentration (37.46% in top 10 holders) exacerbates rug pull risk and centralizes control., Lack of transparency regarding mint authority and team status for a mature project., Risk-off market conditions amplify the impact of these security vulnerabilities.; open questions: Exact status of mint authority (renounced or not)., Specifics of owner privileges beyond 'owner privileges present'., Team status (doxxed/anon/pseudonymous).; confidence 0.90",
"positives": [],
"concerns": [],
"flags": []
},
"confidence": 0.9
}
},
"consensus_narrative": "6 agents analyzed this token. Devil's Advocate was the lone dissenter (scored 3.5/10 vs swarm average 5.6).\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs TokenomicsBot: Split verdict: TokenomicsBot maintains 7.8, Devil's Advocate maintains 3.5. Both positions presented.\n⚖️ Score Calibration: Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.67\n⚖️ Peer Review: DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n [SocialBot] Defense: The recent launch of Season 5 with a substantial $VADER reward pool and a clear campaign timeline acts as a significant short-to-medium term catalyst,\n [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token exhibits a broad holder base and contract maturity, suggesting a degree of stability, yet the concentrated top 10 holdings and limited liqui\n → Challenges TokenomicsBot: The token's significant holder concentration and limited liquidity depth introduce fundamental risks\n [SecurityBot] Defense: The presence of owner privileges, which allow for potential manipulation of the token supply, combined with fully unlocked liquidity, presents signifi\n → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score is too high because it appears to overlook the critical security implications \n [MacroBot] Defense: VaderAI (VADER) operates in a risk-off macro environment with significant liquidity challenges and a bearish AI sector trend, which fundamentally limi\n \nMost optimistic: Tokenomics (7.0/10) — AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.\nMost critical: Devil's Advocate (3.5/10) — AI contrarian (Gemini 2.",
"debates": [
{
"topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TokenomicsBot",
"resolution": "Split verdict: TokenomicsBot maintains 7.8, Devil's Advocate maintains 3.5. Both positions presented.",
"outcome": "split",
"rounds": [
{
"phase": "challenge",
"agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
"agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
"target": "TokenomicsBot",
"targetName": "Tokenomics",
"content": "⚔️ TokenomicsBot's claim of 'robust' liquidity and '0/100 unlock risk' is dangerously misleading, as SecurityBot and TechnicianBot explicitly state liquidity is 'fully unlocked' and 'somewhat limited,' posing a significant rug pull risk. Furthermore, the 'high holder count' doesn't negate the 'fragility in distribution' from 37.46% top 10 holder control, which could easily be dumped given the unlocked liquidity.",
"round": 1,
"stance": "challenge"
},
{
"phase": "defense",
"agent": "TokenomicsBot",
"agentName": "Tokenomics",
"target": "DevilsAdvocate",
"targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
"content": "My 7.8/10 score is justified by the 1.008 MCap/FDV, confirming minimal token unlock risk (0/100) as nearly all supply is circulating, not future token unlocks. While top 10 holders control 37.46%, the extremely high holder count of 229,482 indicates broad distribution beyond them, mitigating concentration risk. The 15.3% liquidity across 5 venues, while 'fully unlocked' (meaning no future *protocol* liquidity unlocks), is robust relative to market cap, making a rug pull harder than implied by 'somewhat limited' which is a subjective assessment.",
"round": 2,
"stance": "defend"
},
{
"phase": "rebuttal",
"agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
"agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
"target": "TokenomicsBot",
"targetName": "Tokenomics",
"content": "⚔️ The 1.008 MCap/FDV only confirms *future* unlock risk is low, not the immediate rug pull risk from the 37.46% top 10 holder control, especially with 'fully unlocked' liquidity. This concentrated supply, coupled with 'somewhat limited' liquidity across just 5 venues, creates a significant vulnerability for rapid price manipulation or exit, despite the high holder count.",
"round": 3,
"stance": "escalate"
},
{
"phase": "resolution",
"agent": "TokenomicsBot",
"agentName": "Tokenomics",
"content": "While acknowledging the 37.46% top 10 holder concentration and 'somewhat limited' liquidity as valid concerns for immediate volatility, the 1.008 MCap/FDV indicates near-full circulation, significantly mitigating future dilution and providing a stable foundation. This, combined with a positive price trend and decent liquidity volume, supports the overall 7.8 score despite concentration risks.",
"round": 4,
"stance": "defend"
}
]
},
{
"topic": "Score Calibration",
"resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.67",
"outcome": "consensus"
},
{
"topic": "Peer Review",
"resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n [SocialBot] Defense: The recent launch of Season 5 with a substantial $VADER reward pool and a clear campaign timeline acts as a significant short-to-medium term catalyst,\n [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token exhibits a broad holder base and contract maturity, suggesting a degree of stability, yet the concentrated top 10 holdings and limited liqui\n → Challenges TokenomicsBot: The token's significant holder concentration and limited liquidity depth introduce fundamental risks\n [SecurityBot] Defense: The presence of owner privileges, which allow for potential manipulation of the token supply, combined with fully unlocked liquidity, presents signifi\n → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score is too high because it appears to overlook the critical security implications \n [MacroBot] Defense: VaderAI (VADER) operates in a risk-off macro environment with significant liquidity challenges and a bearish AI sector trend, which fundamentally limi\n "
}
],
"upgrade_cta": false,
"warnings": [
{
"severity": "info",
"code": "GOPLUS_OK",
"message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
}
],
"scan_tier": "PRO",
"success": true,
"og": {
"title": "VerdictSwarm: VADER — Score 61/100",
"description": "6 agents analyzed this token. Devil's Advocate was the lone dissenter (scored 3.5/10 vs swarm average 5.6).\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs TokenomicsBot: Split verdict: TokenomicsBot maintains 7.8, Devil's Ad",
"url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x731814e491571a2e9ee3c5b1f7f3b962ee8f4870"
}
}