UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x610a5a297fe2135289b8565ef645de2a7c00eba3",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 43,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "Despite revoked authorities and good liquidity, the extremely high concentration in individual wallets for a new token suggests significant risk of a developer or early investor dump.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 8,
      "liquidity_usd": 145295.44999999998,
      "holder_count": 933,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token age is 8 days, indicating a very new launch.",
      "Market Cap is $245K with $145K in liquidity, representing a healthy 59% liquidity-to-market cap ratio.",
      "Mint Authority is Revoked (safe).",
      "Freeze Authority is Revoked (safe).",
      "LP Status is unlocked, which is typical for new DEX listings but means LPs can be removed.",
      "Top 10 holders control 48.9% of the supply, with 0% attributed to protocol-controlled wallets and 100% to individual wallets, indicating high centralization.",
      "The high concentration in individual wallets for a token only 8 days old is a significant red flag for potential price manipulation or a rug pull by large holders."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 933,
    "lp_holder_count": 4,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.4892,
    "top10_holders_pct": 48.92,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-13T13:46:42.619949Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 1089.72,
  "summary": "fetchr (FETCHR) is a base token with $245K market cap, 8 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 0.71,
    "name": "fetchr",
    "symbol": "FETCHR",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.000002446,
    "mcap": 244672,
    "market_cap": 244672,
    "volume_24h": 103632.95,
    "liquidity_usd": 145295.44999999998,
    "contract_age_days": 8,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 933,
    "top10_holders_pct": 48.92,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://fetchr.guru/",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/FetchrEngine"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The fetchr token shows a mixed on-chain picture with a reasonable transaction count and holder base for its age, but significant concentration among top holders raises concerns about distribution quality. Liquidity appears adequate for a young token, but the overall market regime and risk-off sentiment suggest caution.",
        "positives": [
          "Verified contract provides some assurance of legitimacy",
          "Transaction count of 947 in the last 24 hours indicates active trading",
          "Total holder count of 933 suggests a growing interest in the token"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 48.92% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk",
          "Market cap of $244,672.00 is relatively low, which may affect liquidity depth",
          "Lack of data on total volume across all venues limits understanding of overall market activity",
          "confidence 0.50"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 6.5,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; While the high top-10 holder concentration and unknown LP lock status present inherent risks, for an 8-day-old token, these are often expected characteristics of early distribution and data gaps. The verified contract, solid liquidity, and growing holder count suggest a potentially undervalued early-stage project with organic activity, rather than an obvious red flag. The market may be over-weighting common early-stage risks.; risks: High top-10 holder concentration (48.92%) could enable price manipulation or large dumps if early holders decide to exit., LP lock status is unknown, posing a potential rug pull risk if the liquidity provider retains control and decides to remove it., Project description is unknown, making it difficult to assess fundamental value or long-term vision., Lack of social presence and clear roadmap (expected for age, but still a risk factor for adoption)., Extreme Fear market conditions could exacerbate any selling pressure from early holders.; open questions: Specific utility or purpose of the 'fetchr' token., Team identity and experience., Long-term development plans and community engagement strategy.; confidence 0.75",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); FETCHR, a young 8-day-old token on Base with $244k MCAP, faces heightened fragility in the current extreme fear risk-off regime (Fear & Greed 16). Healthy 0.4x volume/MCAP ratio provides some liquidity support for its size, but top 10 holder concentration at 48.92% and lack of known catalysts or sector context expose it to amplified downside versus benchmarks. Without identifiable catalysts or social traction, it is likely to underperform peers in a drawdown.; drivers: Healthy 24h volume at 0.4x MCAP signals organic trading activity for a young token, 933 holders in 8 days shows initial distribution, Liquidity at $145k covers ~60% of MCAP, adequate for microcap; risks: Extreme fear regime (16/100) amplifies small-cap vulnerability on Base, 48.92% top 10 concentration risks dumps in risk-off, Unknown project/sector with no catalysts or X discourse; confidence 0.45",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.45
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); FETCHR is an 8-day-old Base token using a custom DERC20 contract with significant centralized control mechanisms. The contract implements owner-controlled inflation minting (up to 2% yearly), pool locking capability, and burn functions. While the contract is verified and uses OpenZeppelin standards, the owner retains powerful privileges including the ability to lock liquidity pools and mint new tokens. With 100% of LP unlocked, $145K liquidity against $245K mcap, and concentrated ownership (top 10 hold ~49%), the token presents material rug risk. The vesting mechanism and inflation controls are technically sound but don't mitigate the immediate liquidity and centralization risks. For an 8-day-old token in extreme fear market conditions, the combination of unlocked LP, owner mint authority, and pool-lock capability creates exploitable attack surface.; CRITICAL: Unlocked liquidity pool (100%) with owner control — immediate rug vector, Owner-controlled minting authority active — inflation risk post-unlock; risks: 100% LP unlocked with no burn or lock — owner can drain $145K liquidity at any time with zero on-chain constraint, Owner can mint up to 2% of supply yearly via mintInflation() function, diluting holders continuously once pool is unlocked, Pool lock mechanism allows owner to freeze transfers to the liquidity pool via lockPool(), potentially trapping holders, Top 10 holders control 48.92% of supply with unknown wallet composition — high concentration risk for coordinated dumps; confidence 0.78",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.78
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); The token exhibits a high-risk profile typical of a young memecoin, characterized by unlocked liquidity and moderate holder concentration. While the liquidity-to-market cap ratio of 0.594 is strong, the complete lack of locked liquidity (100% unlocked) poses a significant rug pull risk. The top 10 holders controlling 48.92% of the supply also indicates a high degree of centralization for a token with 933 holders.; unlock risk 100/100; + The Liquidity/Market Cap ratio is very high at 0.594, indicating deep liquidity relative to its valuation., The Market Cap to Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) ratio is 1.0, suggesting no immediate token overhang from uncirculated supply., The contract is verified, providing a basic level of transparency.; risks: 100% of liquidity is unlocked, creating a severe and immediate rug pull risk., High holder concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 48.92% of the supply, enables price manipulation., The token is only 8 days old, making it highly speculative and susceptible to volatility., Lack of information on team, project utility, or LP custody makes it impossible to assess long-term viability.; confidence 0.60",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=7.0, IQ=6.0, CG=6.0, BSD=9.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: v1.0 live with ~2000 agents indexed, smart search, 85% reputation accuracy, Reddit-style community.; Streaming beta and app release incoming; accumulation by smart money noted.; Fetchr ($FETCHR) shows promising early social traction with a recent v1.0 product launch generating organic buzz on X. Solo dev @0xExodus is praised for rapid shipping, positioning it as key infrastructure for on-chain AI agents on Base with monetization via x402. Small but positive mentions from Base ecosystem influencers amid risk-off market.; narratives: Google + Stripe for on-chain AI agents: discovery, monetization, full agentic stack., Solo dev excellence on Base ecosystem., Passive income via real revenue (USDC payments, $5 submissions, earn tasks).; fake/coordination risk: 2/100; confidence 0.80",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm agreed FETCHR carries substantial risk, primarily due to SecurityBot and TokenomicsBot highlighting 100% unlocked liquidity, owner-controlled minting, and 48.92% top-10 holder concentration. Key disagreement arose between SocialBot's bullish sentiment, citing organic buzz and a v1.0 launch, and the other bots emphasizing these fundamental security and tokenomic flaws. The D grade reflects that despite 947 transactions and early social traction, the severe centralization and rug pull risk outweigh any perceived early potential. Exercise extreme caution due to critical security vulnerabilities.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Social vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between perceived market enthusiasm and fundamental security risks. While social metrics suggest strong community interest and potential for short-term gains, the severe centralization and inflationary control identified by SecurityBot expose investors to significant long-term manipulation and capital loss, regardless of positive sentiment.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 3.5/10 while Social scored 7.0/10. This 3.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Social may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between perceived market enthusiasm and fundamental security risks. While social metrics suggest strong community interest and potential for short-term gains, the severe centralization and inflationary control identified by SecurityBot expose investors to significant long-term manipulation and capital loss, regardless of positive sentiment.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 7.0 → 6.8",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ SocialBot's 'organic buzz' and 'accumulation by smart money' claims are unsubstantiated fluff, especially when MacroBot notes a lack of 'identifiable catalysts or social traction' and TokenomicsBot highlights 100% unlocked LP as a glaring rug pull risk. No amount of 'small but positive mentions' can offset the immediate danger of centralized control and unlocked liquidity, rendering the social sentiment dangerously detached from reality.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging MacroBot's broader market perspective and TokenomicsBot's valid liquidity concerns, my score reflects specific, early social indicators: the v1.0 launch with ~2000 agents and incoming features *are* catalysts generating organic buzz on X, evidenced by praise for the solo dev and positive mentions from Base influencers. This initial, focused social traction, though small, is distinct from broader market catalysts and warrants a moderate score for its potential.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ The 'praise for the solo dev' and 'positive mentions from Base influencers' on X are superficial metrics that fail to address the fundamental risks of 100% unlocked LP and centralized control. These 'early social indicators' are precisely the kind of manufactured hype that precedes rug pulls, making the project's inherent vulnerabilities, not its 'organic buzz,' the dominant factor.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "The Devil's Advocate correctly highlighted that '100% unlocked LP and centralized control' are fundamental risks, which significantly outweigh the 'superficial' positive social sentiment I initially considered.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.60",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: The token's custom DERC20 contract grants the owner significant centralized control, including the ability to mint up to 2% new tokens yearly and lock\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 7.0 is too high because it likely overestimates the impact of social sentiment \n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: While the fetchr token exhibits some positive on-chain activity like a verified contract and active trading, the high concentration among top holders \n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score is too high as it likely overemphasizes community engagement without sufficiently \n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: The 100% unlocked liquidity presents an extreme rug pull risk, significantly undermining any potential for long-term stability or investor confidence.\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score is too high because it overlooks the critical technical flaw of 100% unlocked liqu\n  [MacroBot] Defense: FETCHR's extreme youth (8 d"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: FETCHR — Score 43/100",
    "description": "The swarm agreed FETCHR carries substantial risk, primarily due to SecurityBot and TokenomicsBot highlighting 100% unlocked liquidity, owner-controlled minting, and 48.92% top-10 holder concentration.",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x610a5a297fe2135289b8565ef645de2a7c00eba3"
  }
}