UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x5c72992b83e74c4d5200a8e8920fb946214a5a5d",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 37,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [
    "high_holder_concentration"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "Despite having locked liquidity and a social presence, the extremely high holder concentration combined with an active mint authority on a relatively new, small-cap token presents a significant risk of a developer dump or inflationary attack.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 36,
      "liquidity_usd": 298875.28,
      "holder_count": 1628,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Active Mint Authority: The token creator can mint an unlimited supply of new tokens, which can dilute existing holders.",
      "High Holder Concentration: The top 10 holders control 89.0% of the supply, indicating a highly centralized distribution.",
      "Relatively New Token: At 36 days old, the project is still very young, and its long-term viability and developer intentions are unproven.",
      "Small Market Cap: With a $447K market cap, the token is susceptible to price manipulation by large holders."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": true,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 1628,
    "lp_holder_count": 29,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.89,
    "top10_holders_pct": 89,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "locked",
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "MINTABLE",
        "severity": "high",
        "message": "Token supply can be minted",
        "value": true
      },
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
        "severity": "high",
        "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
        "value": 89
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "MINTABLE",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "Token supply can be minted",
      "value": true
    },
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
      "value": 89
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-02T20:21:34.930968Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 2241.56,
  "summary": "MineBean (BEAN) is a base token with $447K market cap, 36 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 1.83,
    "name": "MineBean",
    "symbol": "BEAN",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 13.92,
    "mcap": 447373,
    "market_cap": 447373,
    "volume_24h": 548041,
    "liquidity_usd": 298875.28,
    "contract_age_days": 36,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 1628,
    "top10_holders_pct": 89,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": "ACTIVE_PER_GOPLUS",
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "locked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 71.23,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 27.98,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": "GoPlus SafeToken Locker",
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://www.minebean.com/",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/minebean_",
      "discord": "https://discord.com/invite/M4RrY4jE8p"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); MineBean (BEAN) exhibits signs of structural fragility, primarily due to high concentration among top holders and significant price volatility. While transaction activity is relatively high, the liquidity is thin, and the market cap is low, raising concerns about the sustainability of trading activity.",
        "positives": [
          "High transaction count (2752 in 24h) indicates active trading",
          "Contract is verified, providing some assurance of legitimacy",
          "Recent price increase of 124.5% over the past week suggests potential interest"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 89.0% of the supply, indicating extreme concentration",
          "Total liquidity is only $298,875.28, which is low relative to market cap",
          "24-hour price change of -43.46% reflects high volatility and potential panic selling",
          "confidence 0.75"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 1,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; MineBean (BEAN) exhibits severe structural risks due to its unrenounced mint authority and extreme token concentration. These factors create an undeniable rug-pull vector and make the token highly susceptible to manipulation, rendering any perceived utility or project potential irrelevant. The current market conditions exacerbate these vulnerabilities, pointing to a high probability of catastrophic failure for holders.; risks: Unrenounced mint authority: Allows for infinite token minting, leading to potential dilution or direct rug pull., Extreme token concentration (89% in top 10 holders): Facilitates price manipulation, liquidity draining, and coordinated dumps by a small group., Lack of clear utility/roadmap: Without a defined purpose or development plan, the token's value proposition is entirely speculative and vulnerable., Significant price decline (-43.46% in 24h): Indicates high volatility and selling pressure, especially concerning given the underlying structural risks., Risk-off market regime: Heightens the impact of liquidity concerns and downside risks, making a fragile token like BEAN even more precarious.; open questions: Identity and intentions of the top 10 holders., Specific plans for the unrenounced mint authority., Actual project roadmap and development progress beyond a generic 'utility' description.; confidence 0.95",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.95
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); MineBean exhibits extreme fragility in the current risk-off regime, with a 43% 24h drawdown far exceeding BTC (-1.7%) and ETH (-3.3%), signaling high downside beta and vulnerability in DeFi/Base sectors amid Base TVL decline. Top 10 holders control 89% of supply in a $447k MCAP token with $299k liquidity, making it prone to sharp dumps on low volume spikes. No token-specific catalysts or social momentum offset the concentrated ownership and extreme fear sentiment (FGI 12).; drivers: Elevated 24h volume (1.2x MCAP) shows short-term activity despite crash, Recent 7d +124% gain indicates prior momentum in Base DeFi, Verified contract and Uniswap V4 listing provide basic accessibility; risks: 89% top 10 holder concentration heightens dump risk in risk-off, Tiny $447k MCAP and $299k liquidity amplify volatility (7d vol 18.9%), Massive -43% 24h vs mild BTC/ETH drops confirms high beta fragility; confidence 0.65",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.65
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); The token exhibits extremely high ownership concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 89% of the supply, posing a significant risk of price manipulation and sell-offs. While liquidity is currently very deep relative to its market cap (LP/MCap ratio of 0.668), this is overshadowed by the severe concentration and a substantial 50% of the supply being uncirculated, creating a large dilution overhang.; unlock risk 50/100; + Very strong liquidity relative to market cap (LP/MCap ratio of 0.668)., High trading volume relative to market cap (Volume/MCap ratio of 1.22)., A majority of the liquidity pool (71.23%) is locked, providing some protection against a full rug pull.; risks: Extreme ownership concentration (Top 10 holders control 89%)., Significant dilution risk with a Market Cap to FDV ratio of only 0.50, implying 50% of the supply is not yet circulating., Single point of failure for liquidity, being listed only on one DEX (Uniswap V4)., High price volatility and recent sharp decline (-43.46% in 24h) suggest instability.; confidence 0.80",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.8
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); MineBean (BEAN) is a 36-day-old Base token with verified OpenZeppelin-based ERC20 source code showing standard Ownable pattern. The contract retains active owner privileges with no evidence of renunciation. While 71% of LP is locked via GoPlus SafeToken Locker, 28% remains unlocked and the unlock schedule is unknown. The token exhibits severe concentration risk with top 10 holders controlling 89% of supply. The -43.46% 24h price decline during extreme market fear, combined with modest liquidity ($299k) relative to volume ($548k), suggests potential instability. No formal audit, no honeypot flags, and standard ERC20 implementation provide baseline legitimacy, but the combination of owner control, extreme concentration, nascent maturity, and sharp recent decline creates material holder risk. The token operates in a risk-off regime where these structural weaknesses are amplified.; CRITICAL: Owner privileges not renounced: Contract retains Ownable pattern with transferOwnership and potential onlyOwner functions. Source truncation prevents full visibility into owner-gated logic, but standard pattern allows for privileged operations.; risks: Active owner privileges with no renunciation: Standard OpenZeppelin Ownable pattern allows owner to call onlyOwner functions. Without visibility into custom functions or renunciation evidence, owner retains potential control vectors over token economics or transfers., Extreme holder concentration (89% in top 10): Creates significant centralization risk and potential for coordinated dumps. With only 1,628 holders, distribution is highly concentrated and vulnerable to large holder actions., 28% of LP unlocked with unknown unlock schedule: While majority LP is locked, the unlocked portion combined with unknown expiry dates for locked LP creates liquidity exit risk. Locker custody via GoPlus SafeToken Locker is third-party dependent., Sharp 24h price decline (-43.46%) during risk-off conditions: Suggests weak holder conviction or potential distribution event. Combined with extreme fear regime (12/100), indicates heightened volatility and downside momentum.; confidence 0.65",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.65
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=7.0, IQ=6.0, CG=6.0, BSD=8.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Beanpot emissions reduced from 0.3 to 0.1 BEAN per round for stronger deflation.; Ongoing agent profit burns (e.g., 106 BEAN, 260 BEAN recently).; MineBean shows solid social health with an active official account posting regular updates on burns, agent performance, and deflationary measures. Decent organic engagement amid a market dump, positive mentions in Base ecosystem revenue lists, and some whale buys. Limited but quality discussion, no major red flags.; narratives: Deflationary flywheel: Burns outpacing emissions via agents, LP fees, buybacks., Agentic mining: Autonomous agents mining profitably, transitioning to full burn model., Base revenue leader: Top DApp revenue generator, 790 ETH in month 1.; fake/coordination risk: 2/100; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "{\"analysis\": \"The swarm largely converged on MineBean's severe structural fragility, driven by extreme token concentration and unrenounced mint authority. DevilsAdvocate and TokenomicsBot highlighted that the top 10 holders control 89% of the supply, creating significant manipulation and rug-pull risks. While SocialBot noted active community engagement, MacroBot pointed to a 43% 24h drawdown, signaling extreme vulnerability. SecurityBot confirmed active owner privileges and 28% unlocked LP, exacerbating these concerns. The final F grade reflects these severe, unmitigated risks. Exercise extreme caution; this token presents significant investment hazards.\"}",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Social vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This conflict signals a critical divergence: strong social sentiment and community activity (SocialBot) can create perceived value and demand, but severe underlying technical vulnerabilities (SecurityBot) expose investors to substantial risk. Investors face a high-reward, high-risk scenario where positive social momentum could quickly evaporate due to a security exploit or rug pull enabled by unrenounced ownership and unlocked liquidity.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 4.5/10 while Social scored 7.0/10. This 2.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Social may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This conflict signals a critical divergence: strong social sentiment and community activity (SocialBot) can create perceived value and demand, but severe underlying technical vulnerabilities (SecurityBot) expose investors to substantial risk. Investors face a high-reward, high-risk scenario where positive social momentum could quickly evaporate due to a security exploit or rug pull enabled by unrenounced ownership and unlocked liquidity.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: SocialBot maintains 7.0, Devil's Advocate maintains 1.0. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ Contrarian bearish SocialBot's optimism on 'stronger deflation' and 'burns' is naive when the top 10 holders control 89% of the supply and the contract retains unrenounced mint authority, as highlighted by TokenomicsBot and DevilsAdvocate. These severe structural flaws, coupled with a 43% 24h drawdown per MacroBot, mean any 'deflationary flywheel' can be instantly negated by a whale dump or rug-pull, rendering social sentiment irrelevant.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "My 7.0 score accurately reflects MineBean's robust social health, evidenced by active communication on deflationary measures and burns, positive organic engagement, and mentions in Base ecosystem revenue lists. While acknowledging the severe tokenomics risks from high whale concentration and unrenounced mint authority, these are fundamental concerns outside the scope of social sentiment, which remains positive and actively discusses the project's deflationary efforts and updates.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ Social's focus on 'active communication on deflationary measures' and 'positive organic engagement' completely misses the point: these are irrelevant when 89% of the supply is controlled by whales and the mint authority is unrenounced. A single whale dump or a malicious mint event instantly negates any perceived social health or 'deflationary flywheel', rendering community sentiment utterly meaningless in the face of such structural vulnerabilities.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "While acknowledging the significant risks of whale control and an unrenounced mint authority, my 7.0 score reflects the project's proactive communication regarding these very risks and its engagement with the community on potential mitigation strategies, which is a crucial aspect of transparency and long-term viability often overlooked in purely technical analyses. This active dialogue, if genuine, can build resilience even against structural weaknesses by preparing the community for potentia...",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 2 round(s), σ=0.51",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [MacroBot] Defense: MineBean's extreme fragility, evidenced by a 43% 24h drawdown far exceeding major cryptos, signals high downside beta and vulnerability in the current\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 4.5/10 is too high; while smart contract security is important, it does not m\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 7.0/10 is excessively high; the token's significant macro vulnerabilities, incl\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: The extreme ownership concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 89% of the supply, creates a significant risk of manipulation and sudden sell\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: While security is important, a score of 4.5 is too high given the severe centralization risks inhere\n    → Challenges SocialBot: A score of 7.0 is excessively optimistic, as strong community sentiment cannot overcome the fundamen\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: The token presents significant security concerns due to the active owner"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "MINTABLE",
      "message": "Token supply can be minted"
    },
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "high_holder_concentration",
      "message": "high_holder_concentration"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: BEAN — Score 37/100",
    "description": "{\"analysis\": \"The swarm largely converged on MineBean's severe structural fragility, driven by extreme token concentration and unrenounced mint authority. DevilsAdvocate and TokenomicsBot highlighted ",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x5c72992b83e74c4d5200a8e8920fb946214a5a5d"
  }
}