UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x5b5dee44552546ecea05edea01dcd7be7aa6144a",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 24,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "This token is a memecoin with a misleading name, high holder concentration for its age, and insufficient liquidity relative to its market cap, indicating significant risk.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 793,
      "liquidity_usd": 104567.92000000001,
      "holder_count": 91881,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token name 'Memecoin on Base' is misleading as it exists on Solana, not Base.",
      "Liquidity ($105K) is only 27% of the market cap ($385K), which is low for a token of this age and market cap, suggesting potential for significant price impact on sells.",
      "Top 10 holders control 51.8% of the supply, which is high for a 793-day-old memecoin, indicating significant centralization risk.",
      "Market cap ($385K) and 24h volume ($310K) are relatively low for a token nearly 2.5 years old, suggesting limited organic growth or sustained interest.",
      "Mutable Metadata status is unknown, which is a potential risk for a memecoin as it allows changes to token details post-launch."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 91881,
    "lp_holder_count": 18,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.5181,
    "top10_holders_pct": 51.81,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-13T21:45:52.780806Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 784.26,
  "summary": "The Next 100x Memecoin on Base (TN100x) is a well-established base token with $385K market cap, 2+ years old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 2.97,
    "name": "The Next 100x Memecoin on Base",
    "symbol": "TN100x",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.00005271,
    "mcap": 384568,
    "market_cap": 384568,
    "volume_24h": 310159.27,
    "liquidity_usd": 104567.92000000001,
    "contract_age_days": 793,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 91881,
    "top10_holders_pct": 51.81,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 98.73,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://tn100x.com",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/tn100x"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The Next 100x Memecoin on Base shows a mixed on-chain picture with a relatively high holder count but significant concentration among top holders. While transaction activity is decent, the liquidity appears fragile, especially in a risk-off market environment, which raises concerns about execution quality.",
        "positives": [
          "High holder count of 91,881 indicates broad interest",
          "Active transaction count of 2,516 in the last 24 hours suggests ongoing trading activity",
          "Contract is verified and has been operational for 793 days, indicating maturity"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 51.81% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk",
          "Liquidity is relatively low at $104,567.92, which may hinder trading efficiency",
          "24-hour price change of -43.17% suggests significant volatility and potential panic selling",
          "confidence 0.75"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); The token exhibits extremely high risk due to its unlocked liquidity and moderate holder concentration. While the holder base is large (91,881) and the MCap/FDV ratio is healthy at 0.84, the fact that 98.73% of the $104,568 LP is unlocked presents a severe and immediate rug pull risk. This structural fragility, combined with a significant 43% price drop, makes the tokenomics look dangerous despite some positive distribution metrics.; unlock risk 99/100; + Large Holder Base: A count of 91,881 holders indicates widespread distribution at the retail level., High Circulating Supply: The MCap/FDV ratio of 0.84 suggests most of the supply is already in circulation, minimizing future inflationary pressure from new token issuance., Sufficient DEX Liquidity: The Liquidity/MCap ratio of 0.27 is relatively healthy for a token of this size, though this is overshadowed by the unlock risk.; risks: Extreme Rug Pull Risk: 98.73% of the liquidity pool is unlocked, allowing liquidity providers to withdraw their funds at any time, which would crash the price., High Holder Concentration: The top 10 holders control 51.81% of the supply, giving them significant power to influence the price., Single Point of Failure: Trading is confined to a single DEX pair, making the token highly susceptible to issues with that specific liquidity pool., Severe Price Volatility: The token has experienced a -43.17% price change in 24 hours, indicating extreme instability and market panic.; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; Despite its age and large holder count, 'The Next 100x Memecoin on Base' presents severe, unmitigated risks. The lack of LP lock, unknown mint authority, and highly concentrated ownership (top 10 hold 51.81%) create a clear and present danger of a rug pull or price manipulation, especially with relatively thin liquidity. The high holder count is misleading given the whale dominance, and the token's longevity does not negate these fundamental security flaws.; risks: 0% LP locked, making the token highly susceptible to a rug pull by liquidity providers., Unknown mint authority status, posing a potential risk of infinite token minting and dilution., Highly concentrated ownership with the top 10 holders controlling 51.81% of the supply, enabling significant price manipulation or coordinated dumps., Relatively low liquidity ($104k) compared to the number of holders (91k+), making it vulnerable to large price swings and slippage., Meme coin nature with a self-proclaimed '100x' name, indicating high speculation and potential for rapid value depreciation.; open questions: Whether the mint authority is renounced or still active., The identity and intentions of the top 10 holders., The true depth and stability of the community beyond the holder count.; confidence 0.90",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); TN100x, a mature meme coin on Base, is highly fragile in the current extreme fear risk-off regime, with a 43% 24h drawdown, concentrated top-10 holders at 52%, and minimal social presence signaling abandonment despite its age. Elevated volume (0.8x MCAP) suggests panic activity rather than support, amplifying downside vulnerability for memes which bleed hardest in risk-off. No identifiable catalysts or relative strength position it to outperform peers or benchmarks.; drivers: Decent holder count (91k) provides some base distribution, Active volume (0.8x MCAP) indicates liquidity for current size, Base chain exposure offers minor L2 resilience vs pure L1 memes; risks: Extreme fear (12/100) crushes speculative memes with high beta downside, Top-10 concentration (51.81%) heightens dump risk in drawdowns, Minimal social/market presence for mature token flags structural weakness; confidence 0.55",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.55
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); TN100x is a simple, immutable ERC20 token deployed 793 days ago on Base with verified source code. The contract uses Solmate's battle-tested ERC20 implementation with a fixed supply minted at deployment—no mint, burn, pause, blacklist, or admin functions exist. The contract is non-upgradeable and has no privileged roles post-deployment. Primary risk is 98.73% unlocked liquidity, which creates exit risk for the LP provider but does not expose holders to contract-level exploits. The 51.81% top-10 concentration is elevated but not unusual for a meme token with 91,881 holders. The -43% 24h price drop and extreme fear market regime reflect broader risk-off sentiment rather than contract vulnerabilities. No honeypot mechanics, transfer restrictions, or hidden controls are present.; risks: 98.73% of liquidity is unlocked with no known locker or vesting schedule, creating immediate rug risk if LP is withdrawn, Top 10 holders control 51.81% of supply, enabling coordinated dumps or price manipulation, 24-hour price decline of -43.17% in extreme fear market (FG: 12/100) indicates high volatility and potential capitulation, Low liquidity ($104.6k) relative to market cap ($384.6k) creates slippage risk and potential for price manipulation; confidence 0.92",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.92
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=7.0, IQ=7.0, CG=6.0, BSD=8.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: @0xDeployer deployed AI Twitter agent to revive @tn100x 'intern' persona, bought $15k at peak.; Token featured in multiple top gainers lists today (+20% to +204% intraday swings).; Old Base memecoin revived with novel AI-powered Twitter agent by notable deployer @0xDeployer, sparking recent pump and gainer lists. Official account active in 'intern' persona with decent engagement. Limited broader chatter but positive narrative amid volatility.; narratives: Revived dead meme via AI automation., Abandoned office intern with feral money printer meme., Next 100x irony amid Base meme resurgence.; fake/coordination risk: 2/100; confidence 0.75",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "{\"analysis\": \"The swarm converged on a consensus of extreme risk for TN100x, primarily due to the critical 98.73% unlocked liquidity (TokenomicsBot, SecurityBot) and significant holder concentration, with the top 10 controlling 51.81% (DevilsAdvocate, MacroBot). A key disagreement emerged between SecurityBot, which initially rated contract safety high due to immutability, and TokenomicsBot/DevilsAdvocate, who emphasized that unlocked LP constitutes an immediate rug pull risk despite a secure contract. The 43% price drop and fragile liquidity (TechnicianBot) further cemented the bearish outlook, leading to a final F grade. This grade signifies that TN100x presents severe, unmitigated risks of substantial capital loss. Exercise extreme caution; the risk of a rug pull or significant price manipulation is very high.\"}",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Safety vs Technical",
      "resolution": "This conflict matters because a high safety score indicates the token's smart contract is robust and free from malicious functions, preventing technical rug pulls or exploits. However, a low technical score highlights significant market-based risks like concentrated ownership and fragile liquidity, meaning investors could still face substantial losses due to market manipulation or inability to sell, despite the secure code.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "target": "SecurityBot",
          "targetName": "Security",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Technical scored 5.0/10 while Safety scored 8.5/10. This 3.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Safety may not translate to Technical reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "content": "This conflict matters because a high safety score indicates the token's smart contract is robust and free from malicious functions, preventing technical rug pulls or exploits. However, a low technical score highlights significant market-based risks like concentrated ownership and fragile liquidity, meaning investors could still face substantial losses due to market manipulation or inability to sell, despite the secure code.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SecurityBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: SecurityBot maintains 8.5, Devil's Advocate maintains 4.0. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SecurityBot",
          "targetName": "Security",
          "content": "⚔️ SecurityBot's focus on contract immutability completely downplays the catastrophic economic risk of 98.73% unlocked liquidity, which TokenomicsBot correctly identifies as a 'severe and immediate rug pull risk' for holders, not just LP providers. Dismissing 51.81% top-10 concentration as 'not unusual' ignores the 'clear and present danger of price manipulation' and whale dominance highlighted by multiple analyses, making contract-level security irrelevant if the liquidity can be drained.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging the severe economic risks from 98.73% unlocked liquidity and high top-10 concentration, my 8.5/10 score specifically reflects the contract's robust technical security: it's an immutable, non-upgradeable Solmate ERC20 with no privileged functions, preventing contract-level exploits. These economic risks, while critical for tokenomics, do not stem from vulnerabilities within the smart contract's code itself but from external market dynamics and LP management.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SecurityBot",
          "targetName": "Security",
          "content": "⚔️ While technical immutability prevents contract-level exploits, a 98.73% unlocked liquidity still enables an economic rug pull by large holders, rendering the token worthless regardless of contract integrity. The 'robust technical security' is irrelevant if whales holding 51.81% can dump without contract intervention, directly causing economic devastation for all holders, not just LP providers.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "While the economic risks of high unlocked liquidity (98.73%) and concentrated holdings (51.81%) are valid, my 8.5/10 score specifically reflects robust *technical* security against contract exploits, not economic stability. This score emphasizes the absence of vulnerabilities like reentrancy or overflow, which are distinct from market manipulation risks.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 2 round(s), σ=0.49",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: My score of 1.5/10 is firmly supported by the critical finding that 98.73% of the token's liquidity pool is unlocked, presenting an immediate and seve\n    → Challenges TechnicianBot: TechnicianBot's score of 5.0/10 is significantly too high, as it appears to overlook the catastrophi\n    → Challenges SecurityBot: SecurityBot's score of 8.5/10 is far too generous, as it fails to adequately factor in the paramount\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 6.5/10 is excessively high, as it seems to prioritize social metrics over the c\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: As a Safety specialist, my high score reflects the token's robust smart contract security: it's a simple, immutable ERC20 using battle-tested Solmate \n    → Challenges TechnicianBot: TechnicianBot's score is too low because the smart contract itself is exceptionally secure, exhibiti\n    → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score is significantly too low given the"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: TN100x — Score 24/100",
    "description": "{\"analysis\": \"The swarm converged on a consensus of extreme risk for TN100x, primarily due to the critical 98.73% unlocked liquidity (TokenomicsBot, SecurityBot) and significant holder concentration, ",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x5b5dee44552546ecea05edea01dcd7be7aa6144a"
  }
}