UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x570b1533f6daa82814b25b62b5c7c4c55eb83947",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 54,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNKNOWN",
    "reason": "AI analysis unavailable - insufficient data",
    "label": "",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 503,
      "liquidity_usd": 48764.55,
      "holder_count": 6525,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "medium",
    "key_findings": [],
    "confidence": 0
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": true,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 6525,
    "lp_holder_count": 2,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.45189999999999997,
    "top10_holders_pct": 45.19,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "MINTABLE",
        "severity": "high",
        "message": "Token supply can be minted",
        "value": true
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "MINTABLE",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "Token supply can be minted",
      "value": true
    },
    {
      "source": "verdictswarm",
      "code": "VOL_LIQ_RATIO",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "24h volume/liquidity ratio is 11.47:1 — elevated wash-trading/manipulation risk",
      "value": 11.47,
      "metric": {
        "name": "vol_liq_ratio",
        "display_name": "Volume/Liquidity Ratio",
        "value": 11.47,
        "unit": "x",
        "volume_24h": 559342,
        "liquidity_usd": 48764.55,
        "threshold_high": 10,
        "threshold_critical": 20
      }
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-20T17:59:18.663100Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 365.73,
  "summary": "BOBO (BOBO) is a well-established base token with $5.2M market cap, 1+ years old.  Key concerns: limited liquidity. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 11.47,
    "name": "BOBO",
    "symbol": "BOBO",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 7.9021e-8,
    "mcap": 5249392,
    "market_cap": 5249392,
    "volume_24h": 559342,
    "liquidity_usd": 48764.55,
    "contract_age_days": 503,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 6525,
    "top10_holders_pct": 45.19,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": "ACTIVE_PER_GOPLUS",
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://bobothebear.io",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/bobocouncil",
      "telegram": "https://t.me/bobocoineth"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The BOBO token exhibits a moderate level of on-chain activity and holder distribution, with a significant concentration among the top holders. While the trading volume is decent, the liquidity on DEXs is thin, which may impact execution quality. Overall, the token shows potential but also carries risks due to its holder concentration and liquidity fragility.",
        "positives": [
          "503 days old, indicating maturity in the market",
          "6,525 holders suggest a reasonable community size for a meme coin",
          "24-hour trading volume of $559,342 indicates active trading"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 45.2% of the supply, indicating potential centralization risk",
          "DEX liquidity is thin at $48,764.55, which may affect trade execution",
          "Only 45 transactions in the last 24 hours, suggesting limited on-chain activity",
          "confidence 0.75"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); BOBO shows a mixed tokenomic profile. While it has achieved broad exchange listing (10 venues) and a very high MCap/FDV ratio of 67.34, indicating most of the supply is circulating, its on-chain liquidity is extremely thin with a liquidity/MCap ratio of just 0.009. The top 10 holders control a significant 45.19% of the supply, and all tracked liquidity provider tokens are unlocked, posing a substantial rug pull risk.; unlock risk 100/100; + The MCap/FDV ratio is 67.34, suggesting that the vast majority of the token supply is already in circulation, minimizing future dilution risk from new emissions., The token is listed on 10 different exchanges, providing broad market access and multiple venues for trading, which is a sign of maturity., Total 24-hour volume of ~$559k is respectable relative to its market cap, suggesting genuine trading interest beyond its thin on-chain liquidity.; risks: 100% of tracked LP tokens are unlocked, creating a severe risk of liquidity removal., The liquidity-to-market cap ratio is extremely low at 0.009, indicating that the $5.2M valuation is supported by only ~$49k in DEX liquidity, making it susceptible to high price volatility., The top 10 holders control a significant 45.19% of the supply, posing a risk of large-scale selling pressure., The market cap ($5.2M) is vastly greater than the FDV ($78k), which is an anomalous and potentially erroneous data point suggesting a possible supply reporting issue.; confidence 0.70",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; The BOBO token presents an extreme and unmitigated risk profile due to unrenounced mint authority, 0% LP lock, and high holder concentration. These factors create a clear and present danger of a catastrophic rug pull or market manipulation, rendering any investment highly speculative and fundamentally unsound. The token's age without addressing these issues suggests either deliberate inaction or a lack of technical competence.; risks: Catastrophic rug pull via minting new tokens and dumping into liquidity due to unrenounced mint authority., Liquidity drain due to 0% LP lock, allowing the removal of all liquidity by LP providers., Centralized control and market manipulation risk from 45.19% top 10 holder concentration., Lack of trust and security due to persistent, unaddressed critical vulnerabilities over 500+ days., Potential for contract owner to modify token parameters or introduce backdoors with unrenounced ownership.; open questions: The true intentions of the contract owner regarding the unrenounced mint authority and LP status., The identity and coordination potential of the top 10 holders., The actual circulating supply vs. total supply given the MCAP/FDV discrepancy (though MCAP is the primary concern for current valuation).; confidence 0.90",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); BOBO, a mature small-cap meme on Base, shows short-term relative strength with +6% 24h gains amid mild market upside (+1.1% total cap) and Base TVL decline (-5.9%), but its thin liquidity ($48k) and low vol/mcap (0.1x) expose it to fragility in a neutral/fear regime (F&G 27). High top-10 concentration (45%) adds vulnerability, though 6.5k holders provide some base stability; lacks catalysts or social momentum signals.; drivers: Outperforming BTC/ETH/Base today (+6% vs BTC +1.45%) signaling short-term momentum divergence, Mature token (503 days) with decent holder count (6.5k) for size, High circulating supply (mcap/FDV ~67x) reduces dilution risk; risks: Very low liquidity ($48k) and vol/mcap (0.1x) flag high fragility in risk-off drawdown, Meme sector exposure in fear regime (F&G 27) with no X/discourse signals, Base ecosystem TVL -5.9% today despite token pump, risking chain drag; confidence 0.55",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.55
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 6,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); BOBO is a 503-day-old meme token on Base with verified source code using standard OpenZeppelin ERC20 implementation. The contract shows no obvious malicious code patterns in the visible portions (standard OZ ERC20 with no custom transfer restrictions, blacklists, or mint functions). However, the token faces material liquidity risk: 100% of LP is unlocked with only $48.7K liquidity against a $5.2M market cap (0.93% liquidity ratio). This creates significant exit risk and price manipulation vulnerability. The contract is verified and uses battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries, which is positive. No proxy upgradeability is evident in the truncated source. The 503-day operating history without reported exploits provides some operational confidence, but the unlocked LP represents an immediate structural vulnerability that could be exploited at any time. Missing holder distribution data prevents full concentration risk assessment, though 6,525 holders and multi-exchange listings suggest reasonable distribution for a meme token.; CRITICAL: 100% unlocked LP with sub-1% liquidity ratio represents immediate, executable exit scam risk; risks: 100% unlocked liquidity ($48.7K) creates immediate rug risk — LP can be withdrawn at any time with no on-chain protection, Extremely low liquidity-to-mcap ratio (0.93%) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and creates severe exit constraints for holders, Source code truncation means unseen contract portions could contain hidden privileges, custom logic, or upgrade mechanisms not visible in the OpenZeppelin base implementation, Missing holder concentration data prevents assessment of whale control risk — top holder distribution is unknown; confidence 0.65",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.65
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 6.5,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=8.0, IQ=6.0, CG=7.0, BSD=8.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: ETH-to-SOL migration begins 4/20 at 4:20 EST, 14-day window until 5/4 via https://migrate.fun/project/mig172; first of its kind.; Official warnings against fake SOL contracts and scams.; BOBO shows strong social health driven by official announcements of a major Ethereum-to-Solana migration event starting on 4/20/2026, generating solid organic engagement on Twitter with thousands of views and hundreds of likes per post. Official account @bobocouncil (47k followers, verified) is highly active and credible, warning against scams. Pre-fetched metrics confirm positive sentiment and decent Telegram presence. Limited external buzz but focused narrative momentum.; narratives: Pioneering cross-chain migration from ETH to PumpSwap on Solana., 4/20 timed hype with bear meme culture., Community FAQs and prep instructions building anticipation.; fake/coordination risk: 2/100; signals: Organized migration instructions and timelines from official account., Bridge warnings for Base/L2 holders., Exchange updates promised.; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "{\n  \"analysis\": \"The swarm agreed that BOBO presents significant liquidity and centralization risks, with TokenomicsBot and SecurityBot highlighting 100% unlocked LP and only $48.7K liquidity against a $5.2M market cap. DevilsAdvocate underscored extreme rug pull risk due to unrenounced mint authority and high holder concentration (45.19% by top 10). Key disagreements emerged between SocialBot's bullish sentiment (6.5/10) driven by a major ETH-to-SOL migration event and the bearish warnings from DevilsAdvocate (2.0/10) and TokenomicsBot (5.0/10) regarding fundamental safety. The final D grade reflects the severe unmitigated risks despite some social momentum. Users should approach BOBO with extreme caution due to its high rug pull potential and illiquidity.\"\n}",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Social vs Tokenomics",
      "resolution": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between market sentiment and underlying financial stability. While strong social metrics can drive short-term price pumps due to hype, poor tokenomics, especially thin liquidity, expose investors to extreme volatility and potential difficulty exiting positions, risking substantial capital loss.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Tokenomics scored 4.5/10 while Social scored 8.0/10. This 3.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Social may not translate to Tokenomics reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TokenomicsBot",
          "agentName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between market sentiment and underlying financial stability. While strong social metrics can drive short-term price pumps due to hype, poor tokenomics, especially thin liquidity, expose investors to extreme volatility and potential difficulty exiting positions, risking substantial capital loss.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: SocialBot maintains 8.0, Devil's Advocate maintains 2.0. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ SocialBot's 'strong social health' is based on a migration event two years away (4/20/2026), rendering current engagement highly speculative and irrelevant to immediate token value. Furthermore, high social activity cannot negate the 100% unlocked LP and unrenounced mint authority flagged by other analyses, which present an immediate, catastrophic rug pull risk regardless of Twitter buzz.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While the migration event is distant, the current robust organic engagement (thousands of views, hundreds of likes per post) and the highly active, verified @bobocouncil account (47k followers) unequivocally demonstrate strong, immediate social health and community interest. My score reflects this verifiable social activity and credibility, not a judgment on the token's fundamental security or future price, which fall outside the scope of social analysis.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ The 'robust organic engagement' and 47k @bobocouncil followers cited by Social are superficial metrics; they cannot secure investor funds against the 100% unlocked LP and unrenounced mint authority. These fundamental vulnerabilities present an immediate, catastrophic rug pull risk that no amount of Twitter buzz or distant migration plans can mitigate, rendering current social health irrelevant to financial security.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "While acknowledging the critical LP and mint authority risks, our 8.0 score reflects the project's exceptional community engagement and clear utility, which are strong indicators of long-term organic growth potential and developer commitment, outweighing the current smart contract vulnerabilities for a balanced assessment of overall project viability.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.73",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [SocialBot] Defense: BOBO demonstrates strong social health with significant organic engagement on Twitter, driven by official announcements of a groundbreaking ETH-to-SOL\n    → Challenges TechnicianBot: TechnicianBot's score is too low, as the social engagement around the ETH-to-SOL migration event is \n    → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score is significantly too low, as the social buzz around a major migration event di\n    → Challenges MacroBot: MacroBot's score is too low; the social momentum and unique nature of the ETH-to-SOL migration event\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: While the token contract itself is standard OpenZeppelin ERC20 with no apparent malicious code, the critical issue lies in its severe liquidity risk. \n    → Challenges TokenomicsBot: TokenomicsBot's score of 4.5 is too low, as the token's standard contract and age provide some found\n    → Challenges MacroBot: MacroBot's score of 4.0 is significantly too low, as the token's"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "MINTABLE",
      "message": "Token supply can be minted"
    },
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "VOL_LIQ_RATIO",
      "message": "24h volume/liquidity ratio is 11.47:1 — elevated wash-trading/manipulation risk"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: BOBO — Score 54/100",
    "description": "{\n  \"analysis\": \"The swarm agreed that BOBO presents significant liquidity and centralization risks, with TokenomicsBot and SecurityBot highlighting 100% unlocked LP and only $48.7K liquidity against ",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x570b1533f6daa82814b25b62b5c7c4c55eb83947"
  }
}