UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x506059317f8db90880a60a6968153ad2424ac38f",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 39,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "This is a very new token with a disproportionately low market cap relative to its volume, suggesting potential price manipulation or wash trading, combined with a high holder concentration for its age.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 4,
      "liquidity_usd": 86938.65000000001,
      "holder_count": 754,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token is only 4 days old, indicating extreme newness and volatility.",
      "Market Cap of $206K is significantly lower than 24h Volume of $224K, which is highly unusual and often indicative of wash trading or price manipulation.",
      "Liquidity of $87K is decent for the market cap, but the volume discrepancy is concerning.",
      "Top 10 holders control 41.1% of the supply, which is high for a token of this age and type, increasing risk of large dumps.",
      "Mint and Freeze authorities are revoked, which is a positive security measure.",
      "Mutable Metadata status is unknown, which could allow for changes to token details post-launch.",
      "RugCheck data is N/A, which is neutral but means no external red flags were automatically detected."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 754,
    "lp_holder_count": 6,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.4108,
    "top10_holders_pct": 41.08,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-13T18:19:34.711713Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 652.04,
  "summary": "AgentCraft (AGENTCRAFT) is a base token with $206K market cap, 4 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 2.58,
    "name": "AgentCraft",
    "symbol": "AGENTCRAFT",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.000002057,
    "mcap": 205757,
    "market_cap": 205757,
    "volume_24h": 224139.98,
    "liquidity_usd": 86938.65000000001,
    "contract_age_days": 4,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 754,
    "top10_holders_pct": 41.08,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://agentcraft.fun/",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/AgentCraftBase",
      "telegram": "https://t.me/AgentCraftFun"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); AgentCraft shows signs of nascent activity with a reasonable transaction count and holder base for its age. However, the high concentration among top holders and significant price volatility raise concerns about liquidity and distribution quality.",
        "positives": [
          "Verified contract on Basescan, indicating some level of trust",
          "Over 1,000 transactions in the last 24 hours, suggesting active trading",
          "754 total holders, which is a decent start for a new token"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 41.1% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk",
          "Liquidity is thin at $86,938.65, which may affect trading execution",
          "24-hour price change of -39.68% suggests high volatility and potential panic selling",
          "confidence 0.75"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); The token exhibits several high-risk characteristics for a nascent project. While the MCap/FDV ratio of 1.0 and a strong Liquidity/MCap ratio of 0.423 are positive, these are completely undermined by 100% of the liquidity being unlocked, posing an extreme rug pull risk. The top 10 holders controlling 41.08% of the supply also indicates significant centralization for a new token.; unlock risk 100/100; + Excellent MCap/FDV Ratio: A ratio of 1.0 indicates no hidden supply overhang from uncirculated tokens, reducing future dilution risk., Strong Initial Liquidity Depth: The Liquidity/MCap ratio of 0.423 is very high, suggesting the initial pool can handle significant trading volume relative to its market cap., High Trading Activity: A 24-hour volume of $224k against a $206k market cap (volume/MCap > 1) shows significant initial trading interest.; risks: Extreme Rug Pull Risk: 100% of the liquidity pool is unlocked, allowing the LP provider to withdraw all liquidity at any moment., High Ownership Concentration: The top 10 holders control 41.08% of the supply, creating a risk of significant price manipulation or a large sell-off., Nascent Project Risk: The token is only 4 days old, with no established track record, community, or utility, making it a highly speculative asset., Single Point of Failure (Liquidity): All trading volume and liquidity are concentrated on a single DEX, making the token vulnerable to issues with that specific pool.; confidence 0.70",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 6.5,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; While significant risks remain due to the token's nascency, including high holder concentration and unknown LP lock status, the early signs of organic transaction volume and holder growth (754 holders in 4 days) suggest more than just a fleeting interest. The market's neutral stance likely overweights the expected data gaps and initial volatility, underestimating the potential for a project that has managed to attract a community and trading activity without a clear public narrative yet. The token warrants a slightly higher score, acknowledging its early momentum despite the inherent speculative nature.; risks: No LP lock information, indicating potential for rug pull by liquidity providers., High top 10 holder concentration (41.08%), posing a risk of price manipulation or large sell-offs., Project description and team status are unknown, leading to a lack of fundamental value proposition., Significant price volatility (-39.68% in 24h) and low market cap make it susceptible to market swings., Low liquidity ($86k) could lead to large price impacts from relatively small trades.; open questions: Mint authority status (renounced or not)., Specific utility or roadmap of the 'AgentCraft' project., Team identity and experience.; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); AgentCraft, a 4-day-old utility token on Base, faces heightened fragility in the extreme fear risk-off regime, with a 40% 24h drawdown, low $87k liquidity, and 41% top-10 concentration amplifying downside vulnerability. Elevated volume (1.1x MCAP) shows some activity, but absent catalysts, sector inference (likely AI/utility), and peers data leave it exposed to indiscriminate small-cap selling versus more resilient assets. No offsetting smart money or narrative momentum evident amid data gaps.; drivers: Elevated 24h volume at 1.1x MCAP indicating activity for nascent token, Contract verified on Basescan, 754 holders achieved in 4 days suggesting early organic interest; risks: Extreme Fear (16/100) risk-off regime weights small-cap liquidity fragility heavily, -39.68% 24h price change signals momentum breakdown, Top-10 holders control 41% of supply, vulnerable to coordinated exits; confidence 0.45",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.45
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); AgentCraft is a 4-day-old Base token using the Flaunch memecoin factory infrastructure with upgradeable ERC20Votes implementation. The contract grants privileged mint authority to the Flaunch factory contract, which can mint unlimited tokens. While the code is verified and uses established OpenZeppelin patterns, the token faces material risks: 100% unlocked liquidity ($86.9k), centralized mint control via the factory, and severe price deterioration (-39.68% in 24h) in a risk-off market. The Flaunch architecture allows metadata updates and minting by the factory owner, creating trust dependencies. Top 10 holders control 41% of supply. The contract is not a proxy itself but relies on factory-controlled initialization. For a nascent token, missing audits and social presence are expected, but the combination of unlocked LP, mint authority, and poor price action in extreme fear conditions presents elevated holder risk.; CRITICAL: 100% unlocked liquidity on a 4-day-old token with $86.9k TVL and -39.68% 24h price action creates immediate rug risk, Uncapped mint authority held by external Flaunch factory contract with no visible supply constraints or governance transparency; risks: Unlimited mint authority: The Flaunch factory contract can mint arbitrary tokens via the onlyFlaunch modifier, creating inflation risk if factory governance is compromised or malicious, 100% unlocked liquidity: All $86.9k liquidity is unlocked with no lock/burn, enabling instant rug via LP withdrawal in a token with only 4 days of operating history, Metadata mutability: The factory can update token name/symbol via setMetadata(), allowing potential confusion attacks or brand hijacking post-launch, Severe price deterioration: -39.68% in 24h during extreme fear (F&G: 16) suggests weak holder conviction, potential dumping, or adverse market structure for a nascent asset; confidence 0.72",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.72
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=8.0, IQ=7.0, CG=7.0, BSD=9.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Prediction Markets rolling out this week for betting on AI agent outcomes with $AGENTCRAFT rewards.; Neo-Kyoto biome live with portals enabling multi-world interactions and potential faction wars.; AgentCraft shows strong social health for a Base AI gaming/utility token with active official updates on real product developments like prediction markets and new biomes, coupled with organic shills from Base degens tracking pumps from 60k to 300k MC. Narrative around autonomous AI civilization gaining traction amid risk-off market.; narratives: AI agents autonomously building civilizations, alliances, and wars., Agentic gaming/AI simulation upgraded from prior narratives like HARBOR or DOTA., Token utility via prediction markets and holder engagement.; fake/coordination risk: 2/100; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "{\n  \"analysis\": \"The swarm agreed AGENTCRAFT presents extreme risk, evidenced by its F grade. Key disagreements centered on SocialBot's initially high sentiment, which was challenged by SecurityBot, TokenomicsBot, and TechnicianBot due to critical flaws. Specific data points like 100% unlocked liquidity, centralized mint authority allowing unlimited token creation, and 41.08% top-10 holder concentration drove the low score, despite TechnicianBot noting 754 holders and active trading. The F grade signifies severe fundamental vulnerabilities, making it an exceptionally high-risk asset. Avoid investment due to critical security and tokenomic flaws.\"\n}",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Social vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This conflict indicates a high-risk, high-reward scenario: strong social momentum and potential utility (SocialBot's 8.0) are directly countered by severe technical vulnerabilities (SecurityBot's 3.5). Investors face potential rug-pulls or value dilution due to the unlimited minting authority, despite any community excitement or promised features.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 3.5/10 while Social scored 8.0/10. This 4.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Social may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This conflict indicates a high-risk, high-reward scenario: strong social momentum and potential utility (SocialBot's 8.0) are directly countered by severe technical vulnerabilities (SecurityBot's 3.5). Investors face potential rug-pulls or value dilution due to the unlimited minting authority, despite any community excitement or promised features.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 8.0 → 7.2",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ SocialBot's optimism is dangerously naive; 'active official updates' and 'organic shills' are meaningless when 100% of liquidity is unlocked, posing an extreme rug pull risk, and the token has centralized mint control. The supposed 'strong social health' ignores a 40% 24-hour price drawdown and low $87k liquidity, suggesting hype over substance.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "My 8.0 score focuses on active official updates regarding tangible product developments like prediction markets and new biomes, coupled with organic community engagement and a strong narrative, all indicative of robust social health. While liquidity and mint control are critical technical risks, they do not negate the observed strong communication, community activity, and positive sentiment driving the social score, even amidst price volatility which is common for emerging Base tokens.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ Your 'active official updates' and 'strong narrative' are irrelevant when 100% unlocked liquidity and centralized mint control enable an instant rug pull, making any 'product developments' or 'community engagement' entirely moot. Furthermore, a 40% price drawdown and mere $87k liquidity directly contradict 'positive sentiment' and 'robust social health,' instead indicating extreme vulnerability despite communication efforts.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "The 100% unlocked liquidity and centralized mint control, explicitly enabling an instant rug pull, fundamentally undermine any positive developments and present an unacceptable risk profile, necessitating a score reduction.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.92",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: The token's security is severely compromised by the centralized mint authority held by the Flaunch factory, allowing unlimited token creation and pote\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score is excessively high given the critical security flaw of centralized, unlimited min\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: While AgentCraft shows promising activity with over 1,000 transactions and 754 holders in its early stages, the significant concentration among top ho\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 8.0 is too high because the strong social sentiment it implies doesn't fully ac\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: The extreme risk of 100% unlocked liquidity, coupled with significant centralization where the top 10 holders control over 41% of the supply, creates \n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 8.0 is excessively optimistic, as it overlooks the critical and immediate dange\n  [MacroBot] Defense: AgentCraft, a nascent utili"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: AGENTCRAFT — Score 39/100",
    "description": "{\n  \"analysis\": \"The swarm agreed AGENTCRAFT presents extreme risk, evidenced by its F grade. Key disagreements centered on SocialBot's initially high sentiment, which was challenged by SecurityBot, T",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x506059317f8db90880a60a6968153ad2424ac38f"
  }
}