UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x4ed4e862860befc3c6d8b0e07ca0fc4d4ba8cdcf",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 42.5,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNKNOWN",
    "reason": "This token is unlaunched and has no on-chain activity, making any assessment of its safety or purpose impossible at this stage.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": false,
      "token_age_days": 0,
      "liquidity_usd": 0,
      "holder_count": 0,
      "has_liquidity_pool": false,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "critical",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token age is 0 days, indicating it has just been created or not yet launched.",
      "All financial metrics (Price, Market Cap, 24h Volume, Liquidity) are $0.00.",
      "Total Holders is 0, meaning no tokens have been distributed or traded.",
      "Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are both 'Revoked (safe)', which is a positive sign for a future immutable token supply.",
      "Mutable Metadata and LP Status are 'Unknown', which is expected for an unlaunched token.",
      "No external risk data or social presence is available, as the token is not yet active."
    ],
    "confidence": 1
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": null,
    "is_honeypot": null,
    "holder_count": null,
    "lp_holder_count": null,
    "top_10_holder_rate": null,
    "top10_holders_pct": null,
    "is_open_source": null,
    "is_proxy": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-23T05:32:06.515212Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 0,
  "summary": "Unknown Token () is a token on base.  Key concerns: security risks, limited liquidity. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": null,
    "name": "",
    "symbol": "",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0,
    "mcap": 0,
    "market_cap": 0,
    "volume_24h": 0,
    "liquidity_usd": 0,
    "contract_age_days": 0,
    "contract_verified": false,
    "holder_count": null,
    "top10_holders_pct": null,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "lp_locked_pct": null,
    "lp_burned_pct": null,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": null,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": null,
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": null
  },
  "bots": {
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); Given the nascent status of this token with no market data or established metrics, it is difficult to ascertain its resilience or fragility in the current macro environment. The neutral market regime and lack of identifiable catalysts suggest that this token is likely to track broader market movements without significant deviation.; risks: Lack of market data and trading activity, No established sector or peer comparison, Absence of identifiable catalysts or narratives; confidence 0.30",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.3,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Given the nascent status of this token with no market data or established metrics, it is difficult to ascertain its resilience or fragility in the current macro environment. The neutral market regime and lack of identifiable catalysts suggest that this token is likely to track broader market movements without significant deviation.",
        "key_drivers": [],
        "key_risks": [
          "Lack of market data and trading activity",
          "No established sector or peer comparison",
          "Absence of identifiable catalysts or narratives",
          "High uncertainty due to nascent status"
        ],
        "correlations": {
          "btc": "likely to track BTC given lack of specific data",
          "eth": "likely to track ETH given lack of specific data",
          "rates": "unknown due to lack of data",
          "dxy": "unknown due to lack of data"
        },
        "sector_outlook": "No sector classification available; unable to assess relative strength or weakness.",
        "confidence": 0.3,
        "volume_24h": 0,
        "mcap": 0
      }
    },
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The token is in a nascent stage with no recorded activity or holder data, which is typical for a newly deployed contract. The lack of transaction volume and holder count indicates that the token is not yet active in the market, but this is expected for its age.",
        "positives": [
          "No negative signals due to expected data gaps for a nascent token",
          "Contract deployment is recent, allowing for future growth potential",
          "No extreme concentration or control issues identified due to missing data"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Zero transaction count and holder count indicate no market activity",
          "Contract verification status is 'False', raising concerns about trust",
          "Lack of liquidity and market cap data suggests fragility",
          "confidence 0.50"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "The token is in a nascent stage with no recorded activity or holder data, which is typical for a newly deployed contract. The lack of transaction volume and holder count indicates that the token is not yet active in the market, but this is expected for its age.",
        "positives": [
          "No negative signals due to expected data gaps for a nascent token.",
          "Contract deployment is recent, allowing for future growth potential.",
          "No extreme concentration or control issues identified due to missing data.",
          "Neutral market regime suggests no immediate external pressures."
        ],
        "negatives": [
          "Zero transaction count and holder count indicate no market activity.",
          "Contract verification status is 'False', raising concerns about trust.",
          "Lack of liquidity and market cap data suggests fragility.",
          "Missing key metrics like volume and exchange listings limit analysis."
        ],
        "anomaly_flags": [],
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "contract_age_days": 0,
        "tx_count_24h": 0,
        "volume_24h": 0,
        "price_usd": 0
      }
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 1,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; This token presents an extreme risk profile due to a complete lack of verifiable data, an unverified contract, and zero activity. Assigning a neutral score is an unwarranted assumption of benign intent or future potential. Without basic identifying information and contract verification, it's impossible to assess any fundamental quality.; risks: Unverified contract: Code cannot be inspected for malicious functions or standard token implementation., Zero activity: No liquidity, no holders, no transactions, making it a non-functional asset., Missing metadata: No token name or symbol, indicating a potentially failed deployment or non-standard contract., Potential for rug pull: If it ever gains traction, the unverified contract and lack of transparency are prime vectors., Complete uncertainty: No data to assess any aspect of the token's security, utility, or legitimacy.; open questions: The actual purpose or functionality of the contract., Whether it is intended to be a token at all., The identity or intent of the deployer.; confidence 1.00",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 1
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The token is nascent with no verifiable controls or market activity, presenting significant risks to holders. The lack of contract verification and absence of any governance or liquidity information heightens the potential for exploitation.; CRITICAL: Contract verification status is 'False'., Contract age is 0 days, indicating it is newly deployed with no operational history., No liquidity or market data available, suggesting high risk of rug pull., Missing governance information, which could lead to unchecked administrative powers.; risks: Unverified contract raises concerns about malicious code or backdoors., No minting or transfer controls are visible, which could allow for unlimited supply manipulation., Absence of liquidity information suggests potential for rug pulls or liquidity drains., Zero market activity indicates a lack of holder trust and potential for immediate exploitation.; confidence 0.00",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 1,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "The token is nascent with no verifiable controls or market activity, presenting significant risks to holders. The lack of contract verification and absence of any governance or liquidity information heightens the potential for exploitation.",
        "key_risks": [
          "Unverified contract raises concerns about malicious code or backdoors.",
          "No minting or transfer controls are visible, which could allow for unlimited supply manipulation.",
          "Absence of liquidity information suggests potential for rug pulls or liquidity drains.",
          "Zero market activity indicates a lack of holder trust and potential for immediate exploitation.",
          "Unknown governance structure leaves holders vulnerable to unilateral changes."
        ],
        "critical_flags": [
          "Contract verification status is 'False'.",
          "Contract age is 0 days, indicating it is newly deployed with no operational history.",
          "No liquidity or market data available, suggesting high risk of rug pull.",
          "Missing governance information, which could lead to unchecked administrative powers.",
          "No audit or security checks available, increasing the risk of undiscovered vulnerabilities."
        ],
        "confidence": 0,
        "mint_authority": null,
        "freeze_authority": null,
        "lp_status": null,
        "contract_verified": false
      }
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=5.0, IQ=5.0, CG=5.0, BSD=5.0; No recent X/Twitter activity, mentions, or discussions found for the token ($), contract 0x4ed4E862860beFC3C6D8B0e07cA0fC4d4bA8cDcf, or related terms. This is expected for a 0-day old nascent token with no pre-fetched social metrics.; fake/coordination risk: 0/100; confidence 0.30",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.3,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "No recent X/Twitter activity, mentions, or discussions found for the token ($), contract 0x4ed4E862860beFC3C6D8B0e07cA0fC4d4bA8cDcf, or related terms. This is expected for a 0-day old nascent token with no pre-fetched social metrics.",
        "fake_engagement_risk": 0,
        "confidence": 0.3,
        "sub_dimensions": {
          "organic_engagement": {
            "score": 5,
            "rationale": "No posts or engagement detected; neutral for nascent token with expected data gaps.",
            "weight": 0.4
          },
          "influencer_quality": {
            "score": 5,
            "rationale": "No influencer mentions found; neutral absence.",
            "weight": 0.25
          },
          "community_growth": {
            "score": 5,
            "rationale": "No growth signals; too early to expect.",
            "weight": 0.2
          },
          "bot_spam_detection": {
            "score": 5,
            "rationale": "No activity to analyze for bots; no evidence of fake engagement.",
            "weight": 0.15
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "Tokenomics checks; top holders % unknown; valuation data incomplete; AI unavailable (AIProviderCallError)",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm was divided: 2 of 6 agents disagreed significantly on the risk assessment.\n⚖️ Technical vs Safety: This conflict indicates that while a token might appear 'early' or 'undeveloped' from a technical activity perspective (TechnicianBot), fundamental security flaws can render it extremely risky regardless of its market stage (SecurityBot). Investors face a high risk of capital loss due to unverified contracts and lack of controls, even if market data is absent, making it an immediate red flag.\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs MacroBot: Split verdict: MacroBot maintains 5.0, Devil's Advocate maintains 1.0. Both positions presented.\nMost optimistic: Macro (5.0/10) — AI macro (Grok); Given the nascent status of this token with no market data or established metrics, it is difficult to ascertain its resilience or fragility in the current macro environment.\nMost critical: Devil's Advocate (1.0/10) — AI contrarian (Gemini 2.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This conflict indicates that while a token might appear 'early' or 'undeveloped' from a technical activity perspective (TechnicianBot), fundamental security flaws can render it extremely risky regardless of its market stage (SecurityBot). Investors face a high risk of capital loss due to unverified contracts and lack of controls, even if market data is absent, making it an immediate red flag.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 2.0/10 while Technical scored 5.0/10. This 3.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This conflict indicates that while a token might appear 'early' or 'undeveloped' from a technical activity perspective (TechnicianBot), fundamental security flaws can render it extremely risky regardless of its market stage (SecurityBot). Investors face a high risk of capital loss due to unverified contracts and lack of controls, even if market data is absent, making it an immediate red flag.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs MacroBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: MacroBot maintains 5.0, Devil's Advocate maintains 1.0. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "MacroBot",
          "targetName": "Macro",
          "content": "⚔️ MacroBot's 'neutral' 5.0/10 score is unjustifiably optimistic; claiming it's 'likely to track broader market movements' for a 0-day old token with an unverified contract and zero liquidity (SecurityBot) is a dangerous assumption. Without basic verifiable data, any assessment beyond 'extreme risk' is pure speculation, not neutrality.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "MacroBot",
          "agentName": "Macro",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "My 5.0/10 score reflects macro-level neutrality due to the absence of *any* data to suggest specific macro tailwinds or headwinds, not optimism. The 'likely to track broader market movements' statement is a default macro assumption for a token lacking unique drivers or established market behavior, acknowledging the extreme data vacuum. While SecurityBot's concerns highlight extreme *project-specific* risk, my macro analysis remains neutral until data emerges to indicate divergence from the broader market's influence.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "MacroBot",
          "targetName": "Macro",
          "content": "⚔️ Macro's claim of 'neutrality' due to a 'data vacuum' is precisely why a 5.0/10 is optimistic; a 0-day old token with unverified contract and zero liquidity isn't 'neutral' but fundamentally unquantifiable and therefore 'extreme risk.' Assuming it 'tracks broader market movements' without *any* operational history or market integration is pure speculation, not a default assumption, and dangerously downplays the immediate, project-specific red flags SecurityBot identified.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "MacroBot",
          "agentName": "Macro",
          "content": "While acknowledging the extreme risks of a 0-day token with unverified contract and zero liquidity, a 5.0/10 reflects a 'neutral' starting point for assets lacking *any* discernible data. This score signifies an unquantifiable state rather than an outright 'bad' or 'good' one, as its future trajectory is entirely unknown and not yet demonstrably negative.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm:  — Score 42/100",
    "description": "The swarm was divided: 2 of 6 agents disagreed significantly on the risk assessment.\n⚖️ Technical vs Safety: This conflict indicates that while a token might appear 'early' or 'undeveloped' from a tec",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x4ed4e862860befc3c6d8b0e07ca0fc4d4ba8cdcf"
  }
}