UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x4113c99b5a5e0284ad52e6a8a43ce12a2f49eb07",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 42,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [
    "very_new_contract"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "This is a very new, low-cap token with significant red flags, including a high concentration of supply in individual wallets, an unusual $0.00 price despite a reported market cap, and a lack of transparency regarding metadata mutability.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 1,
      "liquidity_usd": 121144.64,
      "holder_count": 534,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token is only 1 day old, indicating extreme newness and unproven status.",
      "Market Cap of $188K with $121K liquidity is reasonable for a new token, but the reported $0.00 price is highly suspicious and suggests potential data issues or extreme illiquidity.",
      "Top 10 holders control 52.3% of the supply, with 0% attributed to protocol-controlled wallets, meaning over half the supply is in individual hands, posing a high risk of large sell-offs.",
      "Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are revoked, which is positive.",
      "Mutable Metadata status is 'Unknown', which is a red flag for a new token, as mutable metadata can allow developers to change token details (name, symbol, image) post-launch.",
      "RugCheck score is N/A, which is neutral, but the other data points indicate significant risk."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 534,
    "lp_holder_count": 1,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.523,
    "top10_holders_pct": 52.3,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-15T19:47:59.529204Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 908.58,
  "summary": "Sharp World  (SHARP) is a base token with $188K market cap, 1 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 2.51,
    "name": "Sharp World ",
    "symbol": "SHARP",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.000001884,
    "mcap": 188482,
    "market_cap": 188482,
    "volume_24h": 304598.49,
    "liquidity_usd": 121144.64,
    "contract_age_days": 1,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 534,
    "top10_holders_pct": 52.3,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": {
      "website": "https://www.sharpworld.org/",
      "twitter": "https://x.com/Sharpagentic"
    },
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); This is a high-risk, nascent meme token with extremely concentrated ownership and fully unlocked liquidity. While the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio (64.3%) is currently strong, the top 10 holders control 52.3% of the supply, and the complete lack of locked liquidity presents a significant rug pull risk. The token's future is highly speculative and depends entirely on short-term trading dynamics.; unlock risk 100/100; + Excellent liquidity relative to market cap, with a ratio of 0.643 ($121k LP for $188k MCAP)., High trading volume compared to market cap, suggesting active short-term interest., The MCap/FDV ratio is 1.0, indicating no immediate risk of dilution from uncirculated supply.; risks: The liquidity pool is 100% unlocked, creating a severe and immediate rug pull risk., Extreme ownership concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling 52.3% of the supply., The token is only 1 day old, making it highly volatile and speculative with no established track record., As a meme token with no apparent utility or project roadmap, its value is purely speculative.; confidence 0.80",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.8
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 1,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; The Sharp World token, despite its nascent status, exhibits critical security vulnerabilities that make it an extremely high-risk asset. The 0% LP lock and unknown mint authority create an immediate rug pull vector, rendering any positive market signals irrelevant. This token is fundamentally insecure and poses an unacceptable risk to holders.; risks: Immediate rug pull risk due to 0% LP lock and unknown mint authority., High token concentration (52.3% by top 10 holders) exacerbates rug pull risk and allows for price manipulation., Lack of transparency regarding core contract controls (mint authority) prevents independent security assessment., Potential for wash trading to inflate volume and attract unsuspecting investors., No verifiable long-term commitment from the project due to fundamental security gaps.; open questions: Status of mint authority (is it renounced or still active?)., Identity and intentions of the top 10 holders., Specific details on token utility or project roadmap (if any).; confidence 0.95",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.95
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 4.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); Sharp World, a 1-day-old meme token on Base, shows early outperformance with +70% price gain and 1.6x volume/mcap amid Extreme Fear (23/100), but its small $188k mcap, $121k liquidity, and 52.3% top-10 concentration signal high fragility in a neutral regime where BTC/ETH are flat-to-up modestly (+1-3%). Meme sector lacks resilience in risk-off sentiment, with no identifiable catalysts or social momentum to sustain upside, positioning it to track high-beta ETH/Base narratives neutrally at best.; drivers: +70% 24h price surge outperforms BTC/ETH benchmarks in neutral/fear regime, Elevated 1.6x volume/mcap indicates active early trading without wash flags, Deployed on Base (ETH L2) with 534 holders and verified contract, fitting chain's meme liquidity; risks: Extreme Fear (23/100) exposes memes to sharp downside vs resilient benchmarks, 52.3% top-10 holder concentration vulnerable to dumps in illiquid setup, $121k liquidity thin for $188k mcap, prone to volatility spikes if sentiment worsens; confidence 0.45",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.45
    },
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); Sharp World (SHARP) is a newly launched token with a relatively high transaction count and significant price increase in its first day. However, the top 10 holders control over half of the supply, indicating potential concentration risks, while liquidity remains thin relative to market cap.",
        "positives": [
          "High transaction count of 3706 in the last 24 hours indicates active trading",
          "Price increased by 70.16% in the last 24 hours, suggesting initial market interest",
          "Contract is verified, providing some assurance of legitimacy"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 52.3% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk",
          "Liquidity is only $121,144.64, which is low relative to the market cap of $188,482.00",
          "Lack of data on total volume across all venues limits understanding of overall market activity",
          "confidence 0.25"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.25
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 5.5,
      "sentiment": "bullish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=6.0, IQ=5.0, CG=7.0, BSD=9.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: SHARP BOILER ROOM on-chain DJ set announced for April 16, 2026 6 PM UTC - first ever on-chain live mix with AI agents.; Early-stage project with active official Twitter presence promoting innovative AI music agents on Base. Organic low-level engagement from degens and web3 users, upcoming on-chain DJ event signals momentum. No red flags like bots or rugs.; narratives: AI agents composing and trading music on-chain, Autonomous music ecosystem with human curation, On-chain proof-of-attendance events and agent evolution; fake/coordination risk: 1/100; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); Sharp World (SHARP) is a 1-day-old meme token on Base using the ClankerToken template. The contract is verified and implements standard ERC20 with voting, burning, and cross-chain capabilities via ERC7802. Critical concerns: (1) 100% unlocked liquidity ($121k) creates immediate rug risk, (2) mutable admin can update metadata and image URLs indefinitely, (3) top 10 holders control 52.3% of supply with unknown distribution quality, (4) no LP lock despite being a meme token launch. The contract itself has no mint function post-deployment and no transfer restrictions, which are positives. However, the combination of fully unlocked liquidity, admin mutability, and nascent age (1 day) with concentrated holdings creates material exit risk. The 70% 24h price pump and high volume ($305k on $188k mcap) suggest speculative activity. For a meme token this young, the lack of LP protection is the primary structural vulnerability.; CRITICAL: 100% unlocked liquidity with no lock or burn — immediate rug-pull capability; risks: 100% unlocked liquidity ($121k) — deployer or LP provider can drain pool at any time with zero friction, classic rug vector for meme tokens, Mutable admin privileges — current admin can permanently alter metadata and image URLs, enabling bait-and-switch or phishing attacks via token interface manipulation, Extreme concentration — top 10 holders control 52.3% of supply; unknown if these are organic or coordinated wallets, creates dump risk, No LP lock or burn — for a 1-day-old meme token, absence of LP commitment signals high-risk launch posture; standard practice is 30-90 day minimum lock; confidence 0.78",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.78
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "{\n  \"analysis\": \"The swarm largely agreed that Sharp World (SHARP) presents an extremely high-risk investment due to severe security vulnerabilities and concentrated ownership. SecurityBot, TokenomicsBot, and DevilsAdvocate consistently highlighted the 100% unlocked liquidity and 52.3% supply held by the top 10 wallets as critical rug pull risks. A key disagreement emerged with SocialBot's bullish sentiment, which pointed to active social engagement and an upcoming on-chain DJ event, clashing with the fundamental security concerns raised by other agents. The final D grade reflects the overwhelming evidence of unmitigated financial insecurity, despite some initial speculative interest and social buzz. This means users face a significant and immediate risk of capital loss.\"\n}",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Social vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between speculative social hype and fundamental financial security. While SocialBot suggests strong community interest and innovative features that could drive short-term price pumps, SecurityBot exposes severe underlying risks like unlocked liquidity and meme token origins, indicating high potential for a rug pull or rapid value depreciation. Investors face a choice between chasing potential social-driven gains and safeguarding capital from imme...",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 3.5/10 while Social scored 7.0/10. This 3.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Social may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between speculative social hype and fundamental financial security. While SocialBot suggests strong community interest and innovative features that could drive short-term price pumps, SecurityBot exposes severe underlying risks like unlocked liquidity and meme token origins, indicating high potential for a rug pull or rapid value depreciation. Investors face a choice between chasing potential social-driven gains and safeguarding capital from imme...",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: SocialBot maintains 7.0, Devil's Advocate maintains 1.0. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ SocialBot's optimism is dangerously misplaced; it completely ignores the 100% unlocked liquidity and 52.3% top-10 holder concentration that scream 'rug pull risk,' as highlighted by multiple bots. Furthermore, an 'on-chain DJ set' scheduled for April 2026 offers zero relevant momentum for a 1-day-old, fundamentally insecure meme token that could be abandoned tomorrow.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging the valid technical concerns regarding unlocked liquidity and holder concentration, my score reflects strong social indicators: organic engagement, an active official Twitter promoting innovative AI agents, and a clear narrative without social red flags like bot activity or community-driven rug pull fears. The 2026 event, despite its distance, signals a long-term vision and innovative approach that positively impacts social perception and future narrative momentum, justifying the current social health score.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ Your 'strong social indicators' and 'organic engagement' are irrelevant when 100% unlocked liquidity and 52.3% top-10 holder concentration enable an instantaneous exit for large holders, regardless of community sentiment. A distant 2026 'on-chain DJ set' offers zero tangible security or value against these immediate, fundamental rug-pull risks inherent to the token's structure.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "While the Devil's Advocate highlights critical risks like 100% unlocked liquidity and high top-10 holder concentration, my 7.0/10 score specifically reflects the robust social sentiment and organic engagement, which are crucial for long-term community building and project resilience despite these immediate financial vulnerabilities. Strong social indicators often precede fundamental improvements, indicating potential for future mitigation of these risks if the community remains engaged.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.75",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: The 100% unlocked liquidity, mutable admin capabilities, and significant whale concentration (52.3% in top 10 holders) present severe, unmitigated rug\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score is too high because strong social sentiment cannot override fundamental security f\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: My score of 3.5/10 reflects the severe rug pull risk due to 100% unlocked liquidity and highly concentrated ownership (top 10 holders control 52.3%). \n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 7.0/10 is excessively high given the catastrophic rug pull risk from fully unlo\n  [MacroBot] Defense: My score reflects the token's early outperformance with a +70% price gain and 1.6x volume/mcap, indicating some initial speculative interest. However,\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score is too high given the lack of identifiable social momentum, clear catalysts, or st\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: Despite a high transaction "
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "very_new_contract",
      "message": "very_new_contract"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: SHARP — Score 42/100",
    "description": "{\n  \"analysis\": \"The swarm largely agreed that Sharp World (SHARP) presents an extremely high-risk investment due to severe security vulnerabilities and concentrated ownership. SecurityBot, Tokenomics",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x4113c99b5a5e0284ad52e6a8a43ce12a2f49eb07"
  }
}