Agent Risk Gate
Need this verdict before your agent moves money?
Wire this same risk decision into a bot, wallet, or trading workflow through the API, ACP offering, or MCP server. The web scan stays available when a human wants to inspect a token first.
Built for autonomous checks, dashboards, and human review
ASH20 (ASH20)
Base
Virtuals Protocolverdict
HIGH RISK - FLAGGED
2 agents
Chain: Base🐝 Help others stay safe
$ASH20 looks risky. Share the warning or save the card before someone in your group apes in blind.
Want this for your whole group?
Send 3 tokens your community is already discussing. We'll return branded risk reports you can drop in chat.
Start a community pilotGet alerts if this token's risk changes:
Agent Risk Gate
Need this verdict before your agent trades?
Add POST /v2/verdict, ACP, or MCP so your bot can get avoid, caution, or clear before it moves money.
This scan used the Free fast lane.
Free includes Technician + Security. Upgrade to Pro for the full 6-agent swarm. Pro adds:
Security Checks
Free starts with the fast lane. Upgrade to Pro for the full 6-agent swarm and Upgraded models with dynamic expertise weighting.
- ✓ Upgraded models with dynamic expertise weighting
- ✓ Bidirectional Devil's Advocate — stress-tests bull AND bear cases
- ✓ 30-day scan history
AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The ASH20 token exhibits extremely poor on-chain health, characterized by a complete lack of trading activity and extreme holder concentration. With 100% of the supply held by the top 10 holders and no transactions recorded in the last 24 hours, the token appears structurally weak and lacks credible liquidity. Positives: Contract is verified; Token is only 23 days old, allowing for potential future growth; No negative signals from contract controls Concerns: 0 transactions in the last 24 hours; 35 total holders with 100% concentration in top 10; Reported liquidity, market cap, and volume are all $0.00; confidence 0.25
AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The ASH20 token exhibits significant risks due to its young age, high holder concentration, and lack of trading activity. The contract allows for minting by a single address (vault) and has several owner-controlled privileges that could be exploited.; CRITICAL: Minting authority is controlled by a single address (vault)., Top 10 holders collectively own 100% of the supply, indicating extreme centralization., No liquidity reported, suggesting potential for a rug pull or lack of market interest.; risks: Single address (vault) has minting authority, posing a risk of unlimited supply manipulation., Top 10 holders own 100% of the supply, indicating extreme centralization and potential for coordinated actions., Lack of trading activity and liquidity raises concerns about the token's viability and market interest., Owner has the ability to set transfer exemptions and block recipients, which could be misused.; confidence 0.30
Supply, distribution & inflation analysis
Real-time community sentiment via X/social
Market conditions & sector analysis
Why 17/100?
Free scans start on the fast lane. Upgrade to Pro for the full 6-agent swarm.
How the Swarm Reached Consensus
The swarm unanimously agreed ASH20 exhibits critical structural weaknesses, with TechnicianBot, SecurityBot, TokenomicsBot, and MacroBot all highlighting 100% supply concentration by the top 10 holders, zero trading activity, and no liquidity after 23 days. While Devil's Advocate offered a contrarian view, suggesting over-penalization for a young token, the overwhelming evidence of extreme centralization and market inactivity from SecurityBot's critical minting authority flag and TokenomicsBot's zero liquidity data drove the abysmal 1.7/10 F grade. This grade signifies ASH20 is an extremely high-risk, illiquid asset with strong indicators of an abandoned project or potential rug pull. Avoid ASH20 due to its severe centralization and lack of market activity.
Agent Debates
2 debates triggeredCross-category conflict: Tokenomics scored 1.0/10 while Social scored 3.0/10. This 2.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Social may not translate to Tokenomics reliability.
This conflict matters because while SocialBot's low score reflects a complete lack of public interest or community, TokenomicsBot highlights critical, fundamental flaws like 100% supply concentration and zero liquidity. A token with no social presence and dire tokenomics presents an extremely high-risk, illiquid investment with no discernible demand or decentralization, indicating a likely rug pull or abandoned project.
️ SocialBot's 3.0/10 score, while low, is still overly generous given the complete absence of social presence. A 'very young token' with zero discussion after 23 days, coupled with 100% concentration and no liquidity, suggests abandonment or scam, not merely unestablished channels; the 'potential future growth' argument is baseless without any foundational activity.
While acknowledging the complete absence of social presence and the valid concerns regarding overall project viability (concentration, liquidity), my 3.0/10 score accurately reflects the *social* landscape: it's not actively negative or bot-infested, merely non-existent, which for a 23-day-old token isn't an immediate social red flag like widespread FUD or scam accusations would be. This score leaves room for potential future social development, as my mandate is to assess social activity, not to predict abandonment based on non-social metrics.
️ Your defense that 'not actively negative' isn't an immediate red flag ignores the critical context: zero social presence for 23 days, combined with 100% concentration and no liquidity, *is* a red flag for abandonment or scam, far outweighing the absence of overt FUD. The lack of any social engagement, positive or negative, for a token with such poor fundamentals at this early stage, directly supports the conclusion of non-viability, not merely 'unestablished channels'.
While acknowledging the potential risks of zero social presence and high concentration, the absence of *actively negative* sentiment or direct scam indicators still prevents a lower score, suggesting a slight upward adjustment for neutrality over outright negativity.
Evidence Locker
The contract allows for minting by a single address (vault) and has several owner-controlled privileges that could be exploited.; CRITICAL: Minting authority is controlled by a single address (vault)., Top 10 holders collectively own 100% of the supply, indicating extreme centralization., No liquidity reported, suggesting potential for a rug pull or lack of market interest.; risks: Single address (vault) has minting authority, posing a risk of unlimited supply manipulation., Top 10 holders own 100% of the supply, indicating extreme centralization and potential for coordinated actions., Lack of trading activity and liquidity raises concerns about the token's viability and market interest., Owner has the ability to set transfer exemptions and block recipients, which could be misused.; confidence 0.30.
Concerns: 0 transactions in the last 24 hours; 35 total holders with 100% concentration in top 10; Reported liquidity, market cap, and volume are all $0.00; confidence 0.25.
AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The ASH20 token exhibits significant risks due to its young age, high holder concentration, and lack of trading activity.
AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The ASH20 token exhibits extremely poor on-chain health, characterized by a complete lack of trading activity and extreme holder concentration.
With 100% of the supply held by the top 10 holders and no transactions recorded in the last 24 hours, the token appears structurally weak and lacks credible liquidity.
Unlock 6 agents · Full reasoning · Cancel anytime
Verify It Yourself
This was a Free fast-lane scan. Pro unlocks the full 6-agent swarm.