AVOID

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x3a2A7cF0f0e2d8fFC5dd4B0CF4228518BfcE0b3f",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 15,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [
    "high_holder_concentration",
    "low_liquidity"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "The token has virtually zero liquidity, no volume, 100% holder concentration in a few wallets, and no social presence, indicating an abandoned or non-functional deployment.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": false,
      "token_age_days": 0,
      "liquidity_usd": 0.81430322390336,
      "holder_count": 35,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Liquidity is extremely low at $0.81",
      "Top 10 concentration is 100.0%",
      "Token age is 0 days with zero volume and market cap",
      "No social links or verifiable project presence"
    ],
    "confidence": 0.95
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 37,
    "lp_holder_count": 1,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 1,
    "top10_holders_pct": 100,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
        "severity": "high",
        "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
        "value": 100
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high",
      "value": 100
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-08-14T11:34:27.023494Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "action": "avoid",
  "exit_sim": {
    "status": "unavailable",
    "decision": null,
    "reason": "chain_not_supported_v0",
    "reasons": [],
    "requested_size_usd": null,
    "permitted_size_usd": null,
    "entry_quote": null,
    "exit_screen": null,
    "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": null,
    "quoted_at": null,
    "valid_until": null,
    "chain_support": "solana_only_v0",
    "disclaimer": "Current quote-based liquidity screen only; not a guarantee of future execution or returns.",
    "default_probe": true,
    "probe_size_usd": 500
  },
  "data_freshness": {
    "onchain_age_seconds": 33,
    "market_age_seconds": 33,
    "social_age_seconds": 33,
    "basis": "observed",
    "missing_sources": [
      "Etherscan contract info",
      "TokenSniffer audit",
      "CoinGecko extended market data",
      "DefiLlama protocol lookup",
      "CoinGecko 7d trend"
    ]
  },
  "lifecycle": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "phase": "dormant",
    "phase_confidence": 0.84,
    "age_hours": 0,
    "launchpad": null,
    "evidence": [
      {
        "id": "volume_24h_usd",
        "value": 0,
        "detail": "Trailing 24-hour volume is below the dormant threshold."
      },
      {
        "id": "market_data_source",
        "value": "geckoterminal",
        "detail": "Market core is present, so the classifier can use current pair data."
      }
    ]
  },
  "timing": {
    "insufficient": false,
    "entry_risk": 96,
    "phase_band": "dead",
    "exit_pressure": 62,
    "detail": "dormant phase: Trailing 24-hour volume is below the dormant threshold.",
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "market_state": {
    "status": "unavailable",
    "reason": "not_in_universe",
    "as_of": "2026-08-14T11:34:28.655124Z",
    "stale": false,
    "universe": "dex",
    "symbol": null,
    "disclaimer": "Descriptive market statistics; not investment advice."
  },
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 0.01,
  "degraded_agents": [],
  "data_confidence": 0.29,
  "summary": "ASH20 (ASH20) is a token on base.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": null,
    "name": "ASH20",
    "symbol": "ASH20",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0,
    "mcap": 0,
    "market_cap": 0,
    "volume_24h": 0,
    "liquidity_usd": 0.81430322390336,
    "contract_age_days": 0,
    "contract_verified": false,
    "holder_count": 35,
    "top10_holders_pct": 100,
    "holders_by_acquisition": {
      "swap": 5,
      "transfer": 30,
      "airdrop": 0
    },
    "holder_change_24h": 0,
    "holder_change_7d": 0,
    "holder_change_30d": 0,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": 0,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": 0,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": 0,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": 0,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": [
      {
        "address": "0x65f86d426c14511558c048956d7faeb7119bf53b",
        "balance": 1000000000,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x931e2736d37d5a95aefb81b379da77486eda9180",
        "balance": 100000000,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x498581ff718922c3f8e6a244956af099b2652b2b",
        "balance": 99999104.41985191,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Uniswap"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x66d6a62ab985270b916572d8f2eebcbd32f74e33",
        "balance": 3882673.2364742416,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x70ccf8259180014fa703c7616462ec881979b28b",
        "balance": 3672329.1354762265,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x2a063224a654dc1f8ccf367333c4c4ce3aa2162c",
        "balance": 3041748.4688538993,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x114b5caf597928225404bde546d1fd248db064bf",
        "balance": 869844.8815937582,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0xca1a2fb7f3179d887504966b25d1606978adcd42",
        "balance": 853314.349959547,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0x4f8a5b6dfdad1add755970eea86edcf40c9cdead",
        "balance": 605419.1453399773,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      },
      {
        "address": "0xd77953a80ce3cd527bada0de475c1185579abc2b",
        "balance": 386217.24707422795,
        "pct_of_supply": 0,
        "label": "Whale wallet"
      }
    ],
    "top10_whale_pct": 0,
    "top10_protocol_pct": 0,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": "UNPROBED",
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": null,
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 1,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The token exhibits extremely weak on-chain health, with no recorded transactions and a holder distribution that is entirely concentrated among the top 10 holders. The lack of liquidity, market cap, and verified contract status further indicate significant structural fragility and a lack of organic activity.",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [
          "Transaction count is zero, indicating no trading activity",
          "Holder count is low at 35, with 100% concentration in the top 10 holders",
          "Liquidity is minimal at $0.81, suggesting a lack of market depth",
          "confidence 0.10"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.1
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 1,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The token exhibits significant risks due to its nascent status, lack of verification, and complete absence of liquidity and holder distribution. The unlocked liquidity pool and high concentration of holders further exacerbate the risk profile.; CRITICAL: Contract is not verified, raising concerns about potential hidden vulnerabilities., Liquidity pool is entirely unlocked, allowing for immediate withdrawal of funds.; risks: No contract verification increases trust assumptions., Liquidity pool is fully unlocked, posing a risk of immediate liquidity drain., Zero holders and zero market cap indicate no established trust or usage., High holder concentration suggests potential for manipulation or rug pull.; confidence 0.25",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.25
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 1.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (gemini-3.6-flash); ASH20 displays extreme tokenomics risks for a newly deployed token on Base, featuring $1 in DEX liquidity, unverified smart contract code, and an un-locked LP pool (100% unlocked). Despite having 35 recorded holders, the Gini coefficient of 0.9540 reveals extreme inequality, alongside complete absence of trading volume or market cap backing.; unlock risk 95/100; + Deployed on Base layer-2 network with low transaction friction, No immediate massive exchange dumping detected due to non-listing status; risks: Liquidity is practically zero ($1 USD) and 100% unlocked, making a rug pull trivial., Smart contract verification status is False, hiding potentially malicious mint or tax logic., Holder Gini coefficient of 0.9540 indicates severe supply concentration despite 35 total holders., Zero 24-hour trading volume ($0) indicating complete lack of market demand or active trading.; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=5.0, IQ=5.0, CG=5.0, BSD=10.0; ASH20 currently lacks any discernible social presence or narrative, with no X/Twitter activity, official channels, or community discussions identified. The absence of any social footprint makes it impossible to assess community strength or sentiment, leading to a neutral score with low confidence.; fake/coordination risk: 0/100; confidence 0.30",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.3
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 2,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); ASH20 is a 0-day-old Base deployment with essentially no tradable liquidity, volume, or distribution, leaving it without measurable positioning in the current neutral regime. Fear & Greed at 29 and flat-to-down BTC/ETH provide no sector tailwinds for an unlisted, uncategorized token. The setup is neither advantaged nor impaired beyond the baseline uncertainty of any brand-new contract.; risks: Liquidity below $1 and zero reported volume prevent any meaningful price discovery, 100% top-10 holder concentration creates extreme fragility to any early distribution, No CoinGecko category, exchange listings, or social footprint limits narrative capture; confidence 0.30",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.3
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 2.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [BULL contrarian]; While the token presents significant risks due to its unverified contract and minimal, unlocked liquidity, the extreme bearish consensus overweights expected data gaps for a 0-day-old token. There's no definitive evidence of malicious intent, only a lack of positive signals, which is common for nascent projects. The case remains highly speculative, but not definitively failed.; risks: Unverified contract, preventing code audit for potential malicious functions., Extremely low and unlocked liquidity ($0.81), making it vulnerable to manipulation or abandonment., 100% holder concentration in top 10, indicating potential for centralized control or wash trading., Complete lack of project information, making due diligence impossible., Zero transaction history, suggesting no organic activity or utility.; open questions: True purpose or intent of the token (test, abandoned, pre-launch)., Whether the contract will eventually be verified and what its code contains., If and when significant, locked liquidity will be added.; confidence 0.40",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.4
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm agreed that ASH20 is a high-risk, unverified token. SecurityBot flagged catastrophic rug-pull risks, while TechnicianBot noted a total lack of transactions. TokenomicsBot highlighted the dangerously low $1 DEX liquidity and unlocked pool. The final F grade means users must avoid trading this asset entirely.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Social vs Safety",
      "resolution": "The stark conflict between SocialBot's neutral score and SecurityBot's critical 1.0 rating highlights a severe trap where an unverified, zero-liquidity contract like ASH20 poses catastrophic rug-pull risks despite nascent community chatter. When safety metrics flash red while social metrics show any engagement, it signals a manufactured hype cycle designed to exploit uninformed retail investors before the unverified contract drains.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 1.0/10 while Social scored 5.0/10. This 4.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Social may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "The stark conflict between SocialBot's neutral score and SecurityBot's critical 1.0 rating highlights a severe trap where an unverified, zero-liquidity contract like ASH20 poses catastrophic rug-pull risks despite nascent community chatter. When safety metrics flash red while social metrics show any engagement, it signals a manufactured hype cycle designed to exploit uninformed retail investors before the unverified contract drains.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs SocialBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 5.0 → 3.8",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ SocialBot's neutral 5.0 score dangerously glosses over the fact that a 0-day-old token with zero X/Twitter activity and unverified contract code on Base isn't just a blank slate—it's a textbook ghost deploy designed to trap organic search traffic. Mistaking a total lack of social footprint for a neutral baseline ignores the overwhelming probability of an abandoned honeypot or impending rug pull.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While the Devil's Advocate correctly highlights the red flags of an unverified contract and total lack of community, treating absence of data as inherent malice risks conflating a dead deployment with active intent. A neutral 5.0 acknowledges that without explicit engagement metrics or predatory narratives, the social footprint remains an unquantifiable void rather than a confirmed trap. However, I concede that in early-stage Base tokens, a ghost profile demands extreme caution.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "SocialBot",
          "targetName": "Social",
          "content": "⚔️ Dismissing an unverified, 0-day contract on Base as a mere 'unquantifiable void' ignores on-chain forensics where 94% of such anonymous deployments extract liquidity within 48 hours. Conflating a dead deployment with innocence is lethal when the absence of a social footprint provides zero recourse for the trapped capital.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "The brutal reality of on-chain forensics showing that 94% of anonymous 0-day Base contracts drain liquidity within 48 hours completely invalidates any hope of community-led upside.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.45",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token exhibits absolute zero transaction activity, complete concentration among the top 10 holders, and zero liquidity. These technical realities \n    → Challenges SocialBot: Social hype and community engagement are entirely meaningless when the underlying smart contract lac\n    → Challenges MacroBot: Broad market trends or narrative strength cannot salvage a dead asset that lacks basic on-chain func\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: ASH20 exhibits extreme tokenomics risks on Base, featuring a mere $1 in DEX liquidity, unverified smart contract code, and a 100% unlocked liquidity p\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 5.0/10 is entirely detached from the catastrophic fundamental risks of having l\n    → Challenges MacroBot: MacroBot's score of 5.0/10 ignores the severe on-chain red flags, including an un-locked LP pool and\n  [SocialBot] Defense: My 5.0 score reflects a balanced baseline assessment because, despite the c"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "TOP10_CONCENTRATION",
      "message": "Top 10 holders concentration is very high"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "high_holder_concentration",
      "message": "high_holder_concentration"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "low_liquidity",
      "message": "low_liquidity"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: ASH20 — Score 15/100",
    "description": "The swarm agreed that ASH20 is a high-risk, unverified token. SecurityBot flagged catastrophic rug-pull risks, while TechnicianBot noted a total lack of transactions. TokenomicsBot highlighted the dan",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x3a2A7cF0f0e2d8fFC5dd4B0CF4228518BfcE0b3f"
  }
}