UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x30ab720c9545e0423e728d9fde7c58919459d574",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 32.8,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [
    "very_new_contract"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "This is a very new, low market cap token with extremely high trading volume relative to its liquidity and market cap, indicating high volatility and potential for a rapid price decline.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 1,
      "liquidity_usd": 119335.35,
      "holder_count": 2066,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token is 1 day old, indicating extreme newness and unproven status.",
      "Market Cap of $151K is very low, making it highly susceptible to price manipulation.",
      "24h Volume of $2.4M is disproportionately high compared to its $151K market cap and $119K liquidity, suggesting intense speculative trading and potential for wash trading or rapid price swings.",
      "Liquidity of $119K is low relative to the 24h volume, meaning large trades can significantly impact price.",
      "Top 10 holders control 53.5%, which is high for a new token, posing a concentration risk.",
      "No social presence links provided, which is a red flag for a new project seeking community engagement.",
      "Price is listed as $0.00, which is unusual and could indicate an extremely low value or data rounding, but combined with other factors, suggests high risk."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 2066,
    "lp_holder_count": 1,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.5352,
    "top10_holders_pct": 53.52,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    },
    {
      "source": "verdictswarm",
      "code": "VOL_LIQ_RATIO",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "24h volume/liquidity ratio is 19.82:1 — elevated wash-trading/manipulation risk",
      "value": 19.82,
      "metric": {
        "name": "vol_liq_ratio",
        "display_name": "Volume/Liquidity Ratio",
        "value": 19.82,
        "unit": "x",
        "volume_24h": 2365664.76,
        "liquidity_usd": 119335.35,
        "threshold_high": 10,
        "threshold_critical": 20
      }
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-14T02:25:41.513912Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 895.02,
  "summary": "Voltsonic (VOLT) is a base token with $151K market cap, 1 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 19.82,
    "name": "Voltsonic",
    "symbol": "VOLT",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.00000151,
    "mcap": 151062,
    "market_cap": 151062,
    "volume_24h": 2365664.76,
    "liquidity_usd": 119335.35,
    "contract_age_days": 1,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 2066,
    "top10_holders_pct": 53.52,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": null,
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); Voltsonic shows a high transaction count and significant price volatility, indicating active trading. However, the top 10 holders control over half of the supply, suggesting potential concentration risks. The liquidity is relatively thin compared to the market cap, which may affect execution quality.",
        "positives": [
          "High transaction count of 8,764 in the last 24 hours indicates active trading",
          "Significant price increase of 566% in the last 24 hours shows strong speculative interest",
          "Verified contract provides some assurance of security"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 53.52% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk",
          "Total liquidity of $119,335.35 is low relative to the market cap of $151,062.00",
          "Lack of exchange listings and broader venue data limits understanding of overall market access",
          "confidence 0.50"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Voltsonic shows a high transaction count and significant price volatility, indicating active trading. However, the top 10 holders control over half of the supply, suggesting potential concentration risks. The liquidity is relatively thin compared to the market cap, which may affect execution quality.",
        "positives": [
          "High transaction count of 8,764 in the last 24 hours indicates active trading.",
          "Significant price increase of 566% in the last 24 hours shows strong speculative interest.",
          "Verified contract provides some assurance of security.",
          "A holder count of 2,066 suggests initial interest and engagement."
        ],
        "negatives": [
          "Top 10 holders control 53.52% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk.",
          "Total liquidity of $119,335.35 is low relative to the market cap of $151,062.00.",
          "Lack of exchange listings and broader venue data limits understanding of overall market access.",
          "The project is only 1 day old, leading to uncertainty in long-term viability."
        ],
        "anomaly_flags": [],
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "contract_age_days": 1,
        "tx_count_24h": 8764,
        "volume_24h": 2365664.76,
        "price_usd": 0.00000151
      }
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; Despite impressive initial trading metrics, Voltsonic presents severe, unmitigated security risks due to an unlocked liquidity pool, unknown mint authority, and high top-holder concentration. These factors create a high probability of a rug pull or significant price manipulation, rendering any current gains extremely fragile. The token's fundamental structure is too precarious to warrant a neutral or bullish assessment.; risks: High risk of rug pull due to unknown LP lock status (0% reported locked) and unknown mint authority., Significant price manipulation risk from top 10 holders controlling 53.52% of supply, especially if the deployer is among them and retains control., Potential for wash trading or bot activity inflating volume, creating a false sense of demand without underlying security., Lack of project description or utility, typical for meme coins, but exacerbates risk when combined with structural vulnerabilities., Extreme volatility and potential for rapid value loss given the unaddressed security concerns.; open questions: LP lock/burn status (critical for security)., Mint authority status (critical for supply control)., Creator address and its holdings/intentions.; confidence 0.90",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); The token exhibits extremely high liquidity relative to its market cap (79% ratio) and a perfect MCap/FDV ratio, suggesting no immediate dilution risk. However, this is severely undermined by a high top 10 holder concentration of 53.52% and completely unlocked liquidity, posing a significant rug pull risk and indicating fragile ownership structure.; unlock risk 100/100; + The MCap/FDV ratio is 1.0, indicating no hidden supply or future token unlocks to dilute current holders., Liquidity of $119k is very deep relative to the $151k market cap, which can absorb significant trading activity., The token has achieved a substantial 24-hour volume of over $2.3 million, showing strong initial trading interest.; risks: 100% of liquidity is unlocked, creating a severe and immediate rug pull risk., High ownership concentration with the top 10 holders controlling 53.52% of the supply., The extremely high liquidity-to-market cap ratio (79%) could be a sign of a 'liquidity trap' set by the deployer., As a one-day-old meme token, it is highly susceptible to hype-driven volatility and rapid sentiment shifts.; confidence 0.70",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "The token exhibits extremely high liquidity relative to its market cap (79% ratio) and a perfect MCap/FDV ratio, suggesting no immediate dilution risk. However, this is severely undermined by a high top 10 holder concentration of 53.52% and completely unlocked liquidity, posing a significant rug pull risk and indicating fragile ownership structure.",
        "key_risks": [
          "100% of liquidity is unlocked, creating a severe and immediate rug pull risk.",
          "High ownership concentration with the top 10 holders controlling 53.52% of the supply.",
          "The extremely high liquidity-to-market cap ratio (79%) could be a sign of a 'liquidity trap' set by the deployer.",
          "As a one-day-old meme token, it is highly susceptible to hype-driven volatility and rapid sentiment shifts.",
          "The lack of any known LP lock or burn mechanism indicates poor security practices from the outset."
        ],
        "positives": [
          "The MCap/FDV ratio is 1.0, indicating no hidden supply or future token unlocks to dilute current holders.",
          "Liquidity of $119k is very deep relative to the $151k market cap, which can absorb significant trading activity.",
          "The token has achieved a substantial 24-hour volume of over $2.3 million, showing strong initial trading interest.",
          "The holder base has grown to over 2000 within the first day, suggesting some initial organic adoption."
        ],
        "unlock_risk": 100,
        "distribution_assessment": "Distribution is fragile and top-heavy. While a holder count of 2066 is reasonable for a one-day-old token, the top 10 holders controlling over half the supply (53.52%) creates significant centralization risk. This concentration gives a small group of wallets disproportionate control over the price, making it vulnerable to manipulation and large sell-offs.",
        "comparable_models": {
          "successful": [],
          "failed": [
            "BALD",
            "NORMIE"
          ]
        },
        "confidence": 0.7,
        "mcap": 151062,
        "fdv": 151062,
        "mcap_fdv_ratio": 1,
        "top10_holders_pct": 53.52,
        "holder_count": 2066,
        "liquidity_usd": 119335.35,
        "liquidity_mcap_ratio": 0.79
      }
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 3.2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); Voltsonic is a nascent meme token on Base with explosive 566% 24h gains and 2066 holders, but extreme fear (12/100) regime exposes its fragility via wash trading signal (15.7x volume/MCAP), 53.52% top-10 concentration, and thin $119k liquidity relative to microcap size. No catalysts or social presence amid neutral macro leaves it high-beta vulnerable without offsetting resilience vs. meme peers. In risk-off, it risks sharp drawdown despite verified contract.; drivers: Rapid holder growth to 2066 in 1 day, 566% 24h price surge showing initial momentum, Decent Base chain liquidity ($119k) for size; risks: Wash trading flag (15.7x volume/MCAP anomaly), High holder concentration (top 10: 53.52%), Extreme Fear sentiment crushes meme liquidity; confidence 0.50",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Voltsonic is a nascent meme token on Base with explosive 566% 24h gains and 2066 holders, but extreme fear (12/100) regime exposes its fragility via wash trading signal (15.7x volume/MCAP), 53.52% top-10 concentration, and thin $119k liquidity relative to microcap size. No catalysts or social presence amid neutral macro leaves it high-beta vulnerable without offsetting resilience vs. meme peers. In risk-off, it risks sharp drawdown despite verified contract.",
        "key_drivers": [
          "Rapid holder growth to 2066 in 1 day",
          "566% 24h price surge showing initial momentum",
          "Decent Base chain liquidity ($119k) for size",
          "Verified contract reduces immediate rug risk"
        ],
        "key_risks": [
          "Wash trading flag (15.7x volume/MCAP anomaly)",
          "High holder concentration (top 10: 53.52%)",
          "Extreme Fear sentiment crushes meme liquidity",
          "Unknown project/team/LP status heightens fragility"
        ],
        "correlations": {
          "btc": "very high beta, amplified downside in fear",
          "eth": "high beta via Base linkage, poor resilience",
          "rates": "risk-off sensitive (higher rates worsen)",
          "dxy": "risk-off sensitive (stronger DXY hurts)"
        },
        "sector_outlook": "Meme sector extremely fragile in extreme fear/neutral regime; microcaps like Voltsonic lag peers on liquidity/concentration issues, no narrative momentum.",
        "confidence": 0.5,
        "volume_24h": 2365664.76,
        "mcap": 151062
      }
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 2.5,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); Voltsonic (VOLT) is a 1-day-old meme token on Base with critical structural vulnerabilities. The contract is verified and uses standard OpenZeppelin ERC20, but 100% of liquidity ($119k) is unlocked and can be withdrawn at any time, creating immediate rug risk. With a $151k market cap and only 2,066 holders, the token shows nascent distribution. The top 10 holders control 53.52% of supply, indicating high concentration risk. The extreme 24h price pump (+566%) on $2.4M volume suggests potential manipulation or coordinated activity. No audit exists, LP custody is unknown, and the creator address is not disclosed. While missing social/exchange data is expected for a 1-day token, the unlocked liquidity represents an executable attack vector that could drain all holder value instantly. The contract itself appears standard, but the economic structure exposes holders to immediate exit scam risk.; CRITICAL: 100% unlocked liquidity with unknown custody - immediate rug pull vector, Creator address undisclosed - no accountability for deployer actions, Extreme 24h price volatility (+566%) on nascent token suggests manipulation risk; risks: 100% unlocked liquidity ($119k) - deployer or LP provider can drain the pool at any time with zero notice, causing instant token value collapse, Unknown LP custody and creator identity - no transparency on who controls the liquidity or can execute a rug pull, Extreme concentration: top 10 holders control 53.52% of supply, enabling coordinated dumps or price manipulation, Suspicious price action: +566% in 24h on $2.4M volume for a 1-day-old token suggests potential pump scheme or wash trading; confidence 0.75",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.75,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Voltsonic (VOLT) is a 1-day-old meme token on Base with critical structural vulnerabilities. The contract is verified and uses standard OpenZeppelin ERC20, but 100% of liquidity ($119k) is unlocked and can be withdrawn at any time, creating immediate rug risk. With a $151k market cap and only 2,066 holders, the token shows nascent distribution. The top 10 holders control 53.52% of supply, indicating high concentration risk. The extreme 24h price pump (+566%) on $2.4M volume suggests potential manipulation or coordinated activity. No audit exists, LP custody is unknown, and the creator address is not disclosed. While missing social/exchange data is expected for a 1-day token, the unlocked liquidity represents an executable attack vector that could drain all holder value instantly. The contract itself appears standard, but the economic structure exposes holders to immediate exit scam risk.",
        "key_risks": [
          "100% unlocked liquidity ($119k) - deployer or LP provider can drain the pool at any time with zero notice, causing instant token value collapse",
          "Unknown LP custody and creator identity - no transparency on who controls the liquidity or can execute a rug pull",
          "Extreme concentration: top 10 holders control 53.52% of supply, enabling coordinated dumps or price manipulation",
          "Suspicious price action: +566% in 24h on $2.4M volume for a 1-day-old token suggests potential pump scheme or wash trading",
          "No audit, no team disclosure, no project description - zero accountability or verification of intent beyond basic contract deployment"
        ],
        "critical_flags": [
          "100% unlocked liquidity with unknown custody - immediate rug pull vector",
          "Creator address undisclosed - no accountability for deployer actions",
          "Extreme 24h price volatility (+566%) on nascent token suggests manipulation risk"
        ],
        "confidence": 0.75,
        "mint_authority": null,
        "freeze_authority": null,
        "lp_status": "unlocked",
        "contract_verified": true
      }
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 2.2,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=1.0, IQ=0.0, CG=4.0, BSD=7.0; Minimal to no social presence detected on X for the specific Voltsonic $VOLT token (CA: 0x30AB720c9545e0423e728D9FdE7C58919459d574). Searches returned unrelated $VOLT tokens and projects like VoltsonicBase (different CA) and $VOLM. No official account, mentions, or community links identified, which is expected for a 1-day-old nascent meme token.; fake/coordination risk: 3/100; confidence 0.30",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.3,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Minimal to no social presence detected on X for the specific Voltsonic $VOLT token (CA: 0x30AB720c9545e0423e728D9FdE7C58919459d574). Searches returned unrelated $VOLT tokens and projects like VoltsonicBase (different CA) and $VOLM. No official account, mentions, or community links identified, which is expected for a 1-day-old nascent meme token.",
        "fake_engagement_risk": 3,
        "confidence": 0.3,
        "sub_dimensions": {
          "organic_engagement": {
            "score": 1,
            "rationale": "No relevant posts found; searches dominated by unrelated tokens.",
            "weight": 0.4
          },
          "influencer_quality": {
            "score": 0,
            "rationale": "No influencer mentions of this specific token.",
            "weight": 0.25
          },
          "community_growth": {
            "score": 4,
            "rationale": "Expected low for nascent token; no growth signals observed.",
            "weight": 0.2
          },
          "bot_spam_detection": {
            "score": 7,
            "rationale": "No bot-like spam or coordination detected in sparse results.",
            "weight": 0.15
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "The swarm universally agreed Voltsonic presents extreme rug pull risk despite recent speculative gains. While TechnicianBot noted a 566% price surge and active trading, SecurityBot, TokenomicsBot, and DevilsAdvocate decisively highlighted critical structural flaws: 100% unlocked liquidity and a 53.52% top 10 holder concentration. MacroBot reinforced these concerns, identifying thin $119k liquidity and an extreme fear regime. The F grade signifies that any perceived market opportunity is severely overshadowed by imminent and unmitigated security vulnerabilities, making it a high-risk, potentially fraudulent asset. Exercise extreme caution and avoid investment due to the high probability of total loss.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between market activity and fundamental security, indicating that while a token might appear actively traded and potentially lucrative (TechnicianBot), its underlying structure could expose investors to immediate and total loss (SecurityBot). Such a scenario means perceived market opportunity is overshadowed by existential rug-pull risk, rendering technical indicators moot if the project's foundation is compromised.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 2.5/10 while Technical scored 5.0/10. This 2.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between market activity and fundamental security, indicating that while a token might appear actively traded and potentially lucrative (TechnicianBot), its underlying structure could expose investors to immediate and total loss (SecurityBot). Such a scenario means perceived market opportunity is overshadowed by existential rug-pull risk, rendering technical indicators moot if the project's foundation is compromised.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 5.0 → 4.0",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ TechnicianBot's 'neutral' 5.0/10 score is dangerously optimistic; the 'significant price increase' and 'high transaction count' are illusory given the 100% unlocked liquidity and 53.52% top-10 holder concentration, which SecurityBot and TokenomicsBot identify as critical rug pull risks. This isn't 'thin liquidity' but a ticking time bomb, especially with MacroBot's wash trading signal (15.7x volume/MCAP) undermining the 'active trading' narrative.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging the critical tokenomics and security concerns regarding holder concentration and unlocked liquidity, my 5.0/10 technical score remains justified by the undeniable, albeit speculative, market activity: a 566% price surge and 8,764 transactions in 24 hours. These metrics, even if influenced by wash trading, still reflect significant short-term speculative interest and trading volume, which are core technical indicators, despite the underlying risks.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ A 566% price surge and 8,764 transactions are precisely what wash trading (15.7x volume/liquidity) and concentrated holders (53.52% top-10) orchestrate to create an illusion of demand. This 'speculative interest' is manufactured, not organic, and is designed to entice new liquidity into a token with 100% unlocked supply, making it a prime rug-pull candidate rather than a technically sound asset.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "content": "The 15.7x volume/liquidity ratio strongly suggests wash trading, undermining the legitimacy of the transaction volume and price surge, thus reducing confidence in organic demand.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "VOL_LIQ_RATIO",
      "message": "24h volume/liquidity ratio is 19.82:1 — elevated wash-trading/manipulation risk"
    },
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "very_new_contract",
      "message": "very_new_contract"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: VOLT — Score 33/100",
    "description": "The swarm universally agreed Voltsonic presents extreme rug pull risk despite recent speculative gains. While TechnicianBot noted a 566% price surge and active trading, SecurityBot, TokenomicsBot, and",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x30ab720c9545e0423e728d9fde7c58919459d574"
  }
}