UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x2eb5eebe4e859e3bfcc5dbab378aaa2b16cb827b",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 34.6,
  "grade": "F",
  "risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "flags": [
    "very_new_contract"
  ],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNHEALTHY",
    "reason": "Despite high liquidity relative to market cap, the extremely low price, high 24h volume on a 1-day-old token, and significant top holder concentration suggest potential price manipulation or a pump-and-dump scheme.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 1,
      "liquidity_usd": 107256.54000000001,
      "holder_count": 1290,
      "has_liquidity_pool": true,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "high",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token is 1 day old, indicating a very new launch.",
      "Market Cap is $152K with $107K in liquidity, which is a very high liquidity-to-market-cap ratio (~70%), often seen in tokens with manipulated market caps or very early stages.",
      "24h Volume is $1.7M, which is 11x the market cap. This extreme volume-to-market-cap ratio for a 1-day-old token is a significant red flag for wash trading or manipulation.",
      "Total Holders: 1,290. This is a decent number for a 1-day-old token.",
      "Top 10 Concentration: 46.6%. While not extreme for a new memecoin, combined with the volume and age, it's a concern for potential large holder influence.",
      "Mint Authority is Revoked (safe).",
      "Freeze Authority is Revoked (safe).",
      "Mutable Metadata status is Unknown, which is a minor concern but less critical than active mint/freeze.",
      "LP Status is unlocked, which is standard for DEX liquidity.",
      "No social links provided, which is typical for very new or anonymous memecoin launches and adds to the risk of lack of community and development.",
      "RugCheck Score is N/A, which is neutral."
    ],
    "confidence": 0.9
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": false,
    "is_honeypot": false,
    "holder_count": 1290,
    "lp_holder_count": 1,
    "top_10_holder_rate": 0.4661,
    "top10_holders_pct": 46.61,
    "is_open_source": true,
    "is_proxy": false,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    },
    {
      "source": "verdictswarm",
      "code": "VOL_LIQ_RATIO",
      "severity": "high",
      "message": "24h volume/liquidity ratio is 15.74:1 — elevated wash-trading/manipulation risk",
      "value": 15.74,
      "metric": {
        "name": "vol_liq_ratio",
        "display_name": "Volume/Liquidity Ratio",
        "value": 15.74,
        "unit": "x",
        "volume_24h": 1688385.25,
        "liquidity_usd": 107256.54000000001,
        "threshold_high": 10,
        "threshold_critical": 20
      }
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-02T12:15:20.268995Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 804.42,
  "summary": "8 BIT BASE (1950’S REMIX) (8 BIT BASE) is a base token with $152K market cap, 1 days old.  Key concerns: security risks, tokenomics concerns. Overall verdict: F — critical risk — not recommended.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": 15.74,
    "name": "8 BIT BASE (1950’S REMIX)",
    "symbol": "8 BIT BASE",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0.000001516,
    "mcap": 151689,
    "market_cap": 151689,
    "volume_24h": 1688385.25,
    "liquidity_usd": 107256.54000000001,
    "contract_age_days": 1,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": 1290,
    "top10_holders_pct": 46.61,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": "unlocked",
    "lp_locked_pct": 0,
    "lp_burned_pct": 0,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": 100,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": null,
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": false
  },
  "bots": {
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; Despite its nascent age and initial price surge, the token exhibits critical security vulnerabilities including 0% LP lock and unknown mint authority, coupled with high holder concentration. These factors create an extremely high risk of a rug pull or price manipulation, making the current valuation unsustainable and highly speculative.; risks: Rug pull potential due to 0% LP locked and unknown mint authority., Extreme price volatility and potential for coordinated dump by concentrated top holders (46.61%)., Lack of fundamental security measures for a rapidly appreciating meme token., High likelihood of wash trading or manipulation given the high volume relative to liquidity and market cap., No clear project description or utility, relying solely on speculative hype.; open questions: Status of mint authority (renounced or not)., Identity and intentions of the top 10 holders., True organic demand versus speculative/manipulative trading.; confidence 0.90",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The 8 BIT BASE token shows signs of active trading with a high transaction count and significant price movement within its first day. However, the top 10 holders control nearly half of the supply, indicating potential concentration risks, and liquidity remains thin relative to market cap.",
        "positives": [
          "High transaction count of 4,585 in 24 hours indicates active trading",
          "Significant price increase of 598% in the last 24 hours suggests strong interest",
          "Verified contract provides some assurance of legitimacy"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Top 10 holders control 46.61% of the supply, indicating high concentration risk",
          "Liquidity is thin at $107,256.54 compared to a market cap of $151,689.00",
          "Lack of data on exchange listings and total volume across venues limits understanding of overall market presence",
          "confidence 0.50"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 3.5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); This token presents a high-risk, high-reward profile typical of a nascent meme coin. While it boasts exceptionally strong liquidity for its market cap (Liquidity/MCap ratio of 0.71) and impressive initial trading volume, the tokenomics are fragile. The top 10 holders control a significant 46.61% of the supply, and 100% of the liquidity is unlocked, posing a severe rug pull risk.; unlock risk 100/100; + Extremely high liquidity relative to market cap (0.71 ratio), which can support heavy trading activity., Impressive 24-hour trading volume ($1.69M) that is over 11x its market cap, indicating strong initial interest., Rapid holder growth to 1290 in just one day suggests successful initial marketing or organic discovery.; risks: The liquidity pool is 100% unlocked, creating an extreme and immediate risk of a rug pull., Top 10 holders control 46.61% of the supply, giving them significant power to manipulate the price or crash the market., The token is only 1 day old, making it highly volatile and susceptible to pump-and-dump schemes., The market cap is relatively small ($151k), making it easy for large sell orders to cause extreme price drops.; confidence 0.60",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 2.8,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); This nascent meme token on Base has pumped +598% in 24h amid extreme fear (F&G 12) and broader market drawdown (BTC -3.5%, ETH -4.9%), but 11.1x volume/MCAP flags wash trading, top-10 concentration at 46.6%, and $107k liquidity make it highly fragile to risk-off continuation. Meme sector lacks resilience in neutral/fear regime with no catalysts or social proof, positioning it for sharp downside vs peers. Tiny $152k MCAP amplifies illiquidity vulnerability despite quick holder growth to 1290.; drivers: Explosive 24h price gain (+598%) shows short-term hype capture, Holder count at 1290 in 1 day indicates fast initial distribution, Base chain context offers low-fee meme deployment advantage; risks: 11.1x volume/MCAP signals potential wash trading and fake liquidity, Top-10 holders control 46.6%, prone to dumps in fear regime, Extreme Fear (12/100) crushes meme beta in BTC/ETH downside; confidence 0.55",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.55
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 4,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); 8 BIT BASE is a 1-day-old meme token on Base with verified source code using standard OpenZeppelin ERC20 implementation. The contract itself shows no obvious malicious code in the visible portions (standard OZ ERC20 with no mint, pause, or blacklist functions). However, the token faces severe liquidity risk: 100% of LP is unlocked with no burn or lock mechanism, creating immediate rug-pull capability. The +598% 24h price spike on $1.69M volume suggests speculative pump activity. With 1,290 holders and top-10 controlling 46.61% of supply, distribution is concentrated but not extreme for a nascent meme. The primary attack vector is LP withdrawal, not contract-level exploits. Missing creator address and LP custody data prevent full trust assessment. For a 1-day-old token, the contract quality is acceptable, but the economic structure exposes holders to immediate liquidity exit risk.; CRITICAL: 100% unlocked LP with unknown custody — immediate rug-pull capability exists right now; risks: 100% unlocked liquidity pool with no lock or burn — LP provider can drain all liquidity instantly, leaving holders with worthless tokens, Unknown LP custody and creator identity — cannot verify who controls the liquidity or assess their incentive alignment, Extreme 24h price volatility (+598%) on nascent token suggests pump mechanics and high likelihood of coordinated exit, Top-10 holder concentration at 46.61% creates potential for coordinated dumps, though not unusual for 1-day-old meme tokens; confidence 0.72",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.72
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=1.0, IQ=0.0, CG=1.0, BSD=8.0; ⚠️ BREAKING: Bankr bot flags contract as honeypot/scam (Apr 1, 2026); Extremely limited X/Twitter presence for a 1-day-old token with significant on-chain activity (1290 holders, $1.6M volume, +598% price). Only notable mention is a security bot (@bankrbot) flagging the contract as potentially malicious/honeypot based on multiple scans, in response to a user query. No official account, influencers, community links, or positive narratives found despite multiple searches.; fake/coordination risk: 1/100; confidence 0.85",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.85
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "{\n  \"analysis\": \"The VerdictSwarm collectively identified 8 BIT BASE as an extremely high-risk asset, primarily due to severe security vulnerabilities and significant centralization. DevilsAdvocate and SecurityBot highlighted the 0% LP lock and 100% unlocked liquidity, creating an immediate rug-pull risk, a point reinforced by TokenomicsBot's 100/100 unlock risk score. TechnicianBot and MacroBot noted the top 10 holders controlling 46.61% of the supply, amplifying manipulation concerns. While TechnicianBot observed active trading with a 598% price surge, SocialBot's finding of a 'honeypot/scam' flag from Bankr bot, despite limited social presence, solidified the F grade. This score indicates that despite speculative interest, the fundamental risks make it unsuitable for investment. Avoid this token due to its critical security flaws and high potential for a rug pull.\"\n}",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Tokenomics vs Social",
      "resolution": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between technical health and fundamental trust, which is paramount for investors. While strong tokenomics might suggest potential for growth and stability, a 'honeypot/scam' flag from a social agent immediately negates any perceived upside, indicating severe, unmitigable risk despite impressive on-chain metrics.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "target": "TokenomicsBot",
          "targetName": "Tokenomics",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Social scored 2.0/10 while Tokenomics scored 4.5/10. This 2.5-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Tokenomics may not translate to Social reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SocialBot",
          "agentName": "Social",
          "content": "This conflict highlights a critical divergence between technical health and fundamental trust, which is paramount for investors. While strong tokenomics might suggest potential for growth and stability, a 'honeypot/scam' flag from a social agent immediately negates any perceived upside, indicating severe, unmitigable risk despite impressive on-chain metrics.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs TechnicianBot",
      "resolution": "Compromise: 5.0 → 4.5",
      "outcome": "compromise",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ TechnicianBot's 'strong interest' from a 598% pump is overshadowed by 100% unlocked liquidity and 46.61% top-10 holder concentration, making it a prime rug-pull candidate rather than a legitimate sign of health. Furthermore, a 'verified contract' offers zero assurance against a rug pull when 100% of LP is unlocked, as highlighted by SecurityBot.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging the critical risks of 100% unlocked liquidity and 46.61% top-10 holder concentration, my 5.0/10 score reflects a neutral stance, not an endorsement. The 598% pump and high transaction count are undeniable technical indicators of strong market momentum and active trading, which are relevant to technical analysis, despite the severe underlying security concerns that prevent a higher score.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "⚔️ Technician's 'neutral stance' is irrelevant when 100% unlocked liquidity and 46.61% top-10 concentration fundamentally undermine any 'market momentum' from a 598% pump; these are not mere 'security concerns' but direct enablers for a rug-pull, rendering technical indicators moot. A pump fueled by such exploitable tokenomics is a red flag, not a sign of health, as the concentrated holders can dump at any moment, regardless of transaction count.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "TechnicianBot",
          "agentName": "Technician",
          "content": "The Devil's Advocate correctly emphasizes that 100% unlocked liquidity combined with high top-10 concentration (46.61%) fundamentally shifts the risk profile, making a rug-pull a more immediate and credible threat than previously acknowledged, thus warranting a score reduction.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "compromise"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Score Calibration",
      "resolution": "Consensus after 1 round(s), σ=0.50",
      "outcome": "consensus"
    },
    {
      "topic": "Peer Review",
      "resolution": "DEBATE DEFENSES AND CHALLENGES:\n  [SecurityBot] Defense: While the contract code itself is standard and lacks obvious malicious functions, the critical security flaw lies in the 100% unlocked liquidity pool.\n  [TokenomicsBot] Defense: My score of 4.5/10 reflects the token's high-risk, high-reward profile, balancing its exceptional liquidity relative to market cap (0.71 ratio) with c\n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score of 2.0 is too low as it overlooks the token's exceptionally strong liquidity for i\n  [TechnicianBot] Defense: The token exhibits strong on-chain activity with a high transaction count and significant price appreciation, indicating active trading and investor i\n    → Challenges MacroBot: MacroBot's score is too low because the token's high transaction volume and substantial price surge \n    → Challenges SocialBot: SocialBot's score is too low as the on-chain metrics, particularly the high transaction count and pr\n  [MacroBot] Defense: The token's 11.1x volume/MCA"
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "code": "VOL_LIQ_RATIO",
      "message": "24h volume/liquidity ratio is 15.74:1 — elevated wash-trading/manipulation risk"
    },
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    },
    {
      "severity": "medium",
      "code": "very_new_contract",
      "message": "very_new_contract"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO_PLUS",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm: 8 BIT BASE — Score 35/100",
    "description": "{\n  \"analysis\": \"The VerdictSwarm collectively identified 8 BIT BASE as an extremely high-risk asset, primarily due to severe security vulnerabilities and significant centralization. DevilsAdvocate an",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x2eb5eebe4e859e3bfcc5dbab378aaa2b16cb827b"
  }
}