UNSETTLED

Public outcome ledger

Counts include misses. The report never hides an outcome because it contradicted the original call.

RAW REPORT PAYLOAD

{
  "address": "0x06d7874037e622d6ef42294cf32eb259806cb1c6",
  "chain": "base",
  "depth": "full",
  "tier": "FREE",
  "score": 46,
  "grade": "D",
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "flags": [],
  "free_tier_result": {
    "verdict": "UNKNOWN",
    "reason": "This token is 0 days old with no financial data, holders, or liquidity, making it impossible to assess its health or potential risks.",
    "label": "AI Verdict",
    "checks": {
      "contract_verified": true,
      "token_age_days": 0,
      "liquidity_usd": 0,
      "holder_count": 0,
      "has_liquidity_pool": false,
      "chain": "base"
    },
    "risk_level": "unknown",
    "key_findings": [
      "Token is 0 days old, indicating it has just been created or not yet launched.",
      "All financial metrics (Price, Market Cap, Volume, Liquidity) are $0.00.",
      "Total Holders is 0, and Top 10 Concentration is 0.0%.",
      "Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are both revoked, which is a positive sign for a token that is not a stablecoin or liquid staking derivative.",
      "Mutable Metadata and LP Status are unknown, which is common for an unlaunched token.",
      "RugCheck data is N/A, as expected for a token with no market activity."
    ],
    "confidence": 1
  },
  "goplus": {
    "source": "goplus",
    "api_available": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "is_mintable": null,
    "is_honeypot": null,
    "holder_count": null,
    "lp_holder_count": null,
    "top_10_holder_rate": null,
    "top10_holders_pct": null,
    "is_open_source": null,
    "is_proxy": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "security_findings": [
      {
        "source": "goplus",
        "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
        "severity": "info",
        "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
      }
    ]
  },
  "security_findings": [
    {
      "source": "goplus",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "severity": "info",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-30T01:38:53.400990Z",
  "cached": false,
  "cached_at": null,
  "liquidity_exposure_cap_usd": 0,
  "summary": "Unknown Token () is a base token with verified contract.  Key concerns: security risks, limited liquidity. Overall verdict: D — high risk — significant concerns identified.",
  "token": {
    "vol_liq_ratio": null,
    "name": "",
    "symbol": "",
    "chain": "base",
    "price_usd": 0,
    "mcap": 0,
    "market_cap": 0,
    "volume_24h": 0,
    "liquidity_usd": 0,
    "contract_age_days": 0,
    "contract_verified": true,
    "holder_count": null,
    "top10_holders_pct": null,
    "holders_by_acquisition": null,
    "holder_change_24h": null,
    "holder_change_7d": null,
    "holder_change_30d": null,
    "holder_supply_top10_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top25_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top50_pct": null,
    "holder_supply_top100_pct": null,
    "exchange_wallet_pct": null,
    "net_exchange_flow_24h_usd": null,
    "top_holders": null,
    "top10_whale_pct": null,
    "top10_protocol_pct": null,
    "mint_authority": null,
    "freeze_authority": null,
    "mutable_metadata": null,
    "lp_burned_or_locked": null,
    "lp_locked_pct": null,
    "lp_burned_pct": null,
    "lp_unlocked_pct": null,
    "lp_lock_expiry": null,
    "lp_locker_name": null,
    "social_links": null,
    "creator_balance_pct": null,
    "authority_governance": null,
    "goplus_trusted": true,
    "goplus_available": true,
    "goplus_status_message": null,
    "bundle_detected": false,
    "is_honeypot": null
  },
  "bots": {
    "MacroBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Macro",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI macro (Grok); Given the nascent status of this token and the lack of available data, it is positioned neutrally within the current market regime. The absence of trading activity and social buzz indicates fragility, but the token's potential for future growth remains untested, leading to a balanced outlook.; risks: Zero trading activity and market cap indicate a lack of liquidity., No identifiable sector or peer comparisons due to missing data., Current market sentiment is bearish, which could hinder initial adoption.; confidence 0.25",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.25,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "Given the nascent status of this token and the lack of available data, it is positioned neutrally within the current market regime. The absence of trading activity and social buzz indicates fragility, but the token's potential for future growth remains untested, leading to a balanced outlook.",
        "key_drivers": [],
        "key_risks": [
          "Zero trading activity and market cap indicate a lack of liquidity.",
          "No identifiable sector or peer comparisons due to missing data.",
          "Current market sentiment is bearish, which could hinder initial adoption.",
          "No macro or sector-specific catalysts identified for the next 30-90 days."
        ],
        "correlations": {
          "btc": "unknown",
          "eth": "unknown",
          "rates": "unknown",
          "dxy": "unknown"
        },
        "sector_outlook": "The token's sector is undefined, limiting the ability to assess its relative strength against peers.",
        "confidence": 0.25,
        "volume_24h": 0,
        "mcap": 0
      }
    },
    "TokenomicsBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI tokenomics (Gemini 2.5 Flash); This token is 0 days old, and all financial and holder data is currently unavailable or zero, which is expected for a nascent project. The contract is verified, but without any on-chain activity or market data, a comprehensive tokenomics assessment is not possible. The current state offers no strong signals for durability or fragility.; unlock risk: uncertain; + The token contract is verified on the Base chain, indicating a basic level of transparency and deployer competence., As a nascent token (0 days old), the absence of market and holder data is expected and not inherently negative., No immediate red flags (e.g., unverified contract, known malicious patterns) are present in the limited available data.; risks: Complete lack of financial data (price, volume, market cap, liquidity) makes any valuation or risk assessment impossible., Absence of holder data means no insight into initial distribution, concentration, or potential insider control., No information on vesting schedules, emissions, or supply dynamics, leading to high uncertainty regarding future dilution., Lack of exchange listings and trading activity means no real liquidity or price discovery has occurred.; confidence 0.80",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "This token is 0 days old, and all financial and holder data is currently unavailable or zero, which is expected for a nascent project. The contract is verified, but without any on-chain activity or market data, a comprehensive tokenomics assessment is not possible. The current state offers no strong signals for durability or fragility.",
        "key_risks": [
          "Complete lack of financial data (price, volume, market cap, liquidity) makes any valuation or risk assessment impossible.",
          "Absence of holder data means no insight into initial distribution, concentration, or potential insider control.",
          "No information on vesting schedules, emissions, or supply dynamics, leading to high uncertainty regarding future dilution.",
          "Lack of exchange listings and trading activity means no real liquidity or price discovery has occurred.",
          "Project details (name, description) are unknown, preventing fundamental analysis of its purpose or potential."
        ],
        "positives": [
          "The token contract is verified on the Base chain, indicating a basic level of transparency and deployer competence.",
          "As a nascent token (0 days old), the absence of market and holder data is expected and not inherently negative.",
          "No immediate red flags (e.g., unverified contract, known malicious patterns) are present in the limited available data.",
          "The token has not yet accumulated any negative trading history or significant concentration issues, as no activity is recorded."
        ],
        "unlock_risk": "uncertain",
        "distribution_assessment": "All holder data, including top 10 holders percentage, holder count, and concentration metrics, is unavailable. Given the token's age (0 days), this is expected as distribution has not yet begun or been recorded. Therefore, no assessment of distribution breadth or concentration can be made at this time.",
        "comparable_models": {
          "successful": [],
          "failed": []
        },
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "mcap": 0,
        "fdv": 0,
        "mcap_fdv_ratio": null,
        "top10_holders_pct": null,
        "holder_count": null,
        "liquidity_usd": 0,
        "liquidity_mcap_ratio": null
      }
    },
    "SocialBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Social",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "X/Twitter sentiment (Grok); sub-scores: OE=5.0, IQ=5.0, CG=5.0, BSD=5.0; This token currently lacks any discernible social presence or narrative on X/Twitter, with no community channels or influencer mentions detected. The absence of data suggests it is either extremely nascent or has failed to gain any traction, making a definitive assessment of its social health impossible at this stage.; fake/coordination risk: 0/100; confidence 0.30",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.3,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "This token currently lacks any discernible social presence or narrative on X/Twitter, with no community channels or influencer mentions detected. The absence of data suggests it is either extremely nascent or has failed to gain any traction, making a definitive assessment of its social health impossible at this stage.",
        "fake_engagement_risk": 0,
        "confidence": 0.3,
        "authoritative_metrics": {
          "twitter_metrics": {
            "url": null,
            "handle": null,
            "followers": null,
            "account_age_days": null,
            "tweets_per_week": null,
            "engagement_rate_pct": null,
            "mention_volume_7d": null,
            "sentiment_positive_pct": null,
            "sentiment_negative_pct": null,
            "source": null
          },
          "coingecko_community_baseline": {
            "official_x_handle": null,
            "telegram_users": null,
            "watchlist_users": null,
            "sentiment_positive_pct": null,
            "sentiment_negative_pct": null,
            "reddit_subscribers": null,
            "categories": [],
            "source": "coingecko_contract"
          },
          "community_links": {
            "twitter": null,
            "telegram": null,
            "discord": null,
            "website": null
          }
        },
        "sub_dimensions": {
          "organic_engagement": {
            "score": 5,
            "rationale": "No organic engagement data is available, leading to a neutral score due to the token's likely nascent or unestablished status.",
            "weight": 0.4
          },
          "influencer_quality": {
            "score": 5,
            "rationale": "No influencers are discussing the token, resulting in a neutral score as there's no coverage to evaluate.",
            "weight": 0.25
          },
          "community_growth": {
            "score": 5,
            "rationale": "No community channels or social metrics are available to assess growth, thus a neutral score is assigned.",
            "weight": 0.2
          },
          "bot_spam_detection": {
            "score": 5,
            "rationale": "With no social activity detected, there is no data to indicate the presence or absence of bot activity, leading to a neutral score.",
            "weight": 0.15
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "SecurityBot": {
      "score": 3,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Safety",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI security (gpt-4o-mini); The token is newly deployed with no activity, liquidity, or holder distribution, presenting significant risks due to the lack of governance transparency and potential for immediate exploitation.; CRITICAL: No liquidity or market cap, indicating no financial backing or user trust., No holder distribution, suggesting potential for a rug pull or concentrated control.; risks: No holders or transactions detected, indicating no market activity., Lack of governance information raises concerns about control and potential for malicious actions., Contract is newly deployed with no historical performance or trust established., Missing critical data such as liquidity pool status and creator governance, which could indicate high risk.; confidence 0.20",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.2,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "The token is newly deployed with no activity, liquidity, or holder distribution, presenting significant risks due to the lack of governance transparency and potential for immediate exploitation.",
        "key_risks": [
          "No holders or transactions detected, indicating no market activity.",
          "Lack of governance information raises concerns about control and potential for malicious actions.",
          "Contract is newly deployed with no historical performance or trust established.",
          "Missing critical data such as liquidity pool status and creator governance, which could indicate high risk.",
          "Absence of audits or third-party security checks increases uncertainty."
        ],
        "critical_flags": [
          "No liquidity or market cap, indicating no financial backing or user trust.",
          "No holder distribution, suggesting potential for a rug pull or concentrated control."
        ],
        "confidence": 0.2,
        "mint_authority": null,
        "freeze_authority": null,
        "lp_status": null,
        "contract_verified": true
      }
    },
    "TechnicianBot": {
      "score": 5,
      "sentiment": "neutral",
      "category": "Technical",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); The token is nascent with no recorded activity or holders, which is typical for a newly deployed contract. While the contract is verified, the absence of any transactions or liquidity indicates that it is still in the early stages of development and market engagement.",
        "positives": [
          "Contract is verified on Base chain",
          "No negative signals from missing data, as gaps are expected for a nascent token",
          "Potential for future growth as the token matures"
        ],
        "concerns": [
          "Zero transaction count indicates no trading activity",
          "No holders detected, suggesting lack of interest or engagement",
          "Liquidity is non-existent, which limits tradability",
          "confidence 0.25"
        ],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 0.25,
      "structured_findings": {
        "summary": "The token is nascent with no recorded activity or holders, which is typical for a newly deployed contract. While the contract is verified, the absence of any transactions or liquidity indicates that it is still in the early stages of development and market engagement.",
        "positives": [
          "Contract is verified on Base chain.",
          "No negative signals from missing data, as gaps are expected for a nascent token.",
          "Potential for future growth as the token matures.",
          "No signs of malicious activity or control issues."
        ],
        "negatives": [
          "Zero transaction count indicates no trading activity.",
          "No holders detected, suggesting lack of interest or engagement.",
          "Liquidity is non-existent, which limits tradability.",
          "Market cap and price data are unavailable, indicating a lack of market presence."
        ],
        "anomaly_flags": [],
        "confidence": 0.25,
        "contract_age_days": 0,
        "tx_count_24h": 0,
        "volume_24h": 0,
        "price_usd": 0
      }
    },
    "DevilsAdvocate": {
      "score": 1,
      "sentiment": "bearish",
      "category": "Contrarian",
      "reasoning": {
        "summary": "AI contrarian (Gemini 2.5 Flash) [NEUTRAL contrarian]; This token is an unlaunched contract with no market activity whatsoever. While contract verification is a positive technical step, it does not confer value or potential in the absence of liquidity, holders, or transactions. Assigning a neutral score to an inert contract overstates its current status and ignores the complete lack of any fundamental on-chain activity.; risks: No liquidity: Token cannot be bought or sold., No holders: No community or distribution., No transactions: Complete lack of utility or movement., No project information: Zero context for future potential., Potential for rug pull (if liquidity is added and then removed by creator).; open questions: Purpose or project behind the contract., Whether liquidity will ever be added., Whether the token will ever be launched or gain utility.; confidence 1.00",
        "positives": [],
        "concerns": [],
        "flags": []
      },
      "confidence": 1
    }
  },
  "consensus_narrative": "6 agents analyzed this token. Devil's Advocate was the lone dissenter (scored 1.0/10 vs swarm average 4.0).\n⚖️ Technical vs Safety: This conflict matters for investors because TechnicianBot's 'good' score merely confirms basic contract deployment, while SecurityBot's 'bad' score reveals critical unmitigated financial and operational risks. A technically verified contract with no activity or liquidity means investors could easily lose capital to a rug pull or be unable to sell due to zero market depth.\n⚖️ Devil's Advocate vs MacroBot: Split verdict: MacroBot maintains 5.0, Devil's Advocate maintains 1.0. Both positions presented.\nMost optimistic: Macro (5.0/10) — AI macro (Grok); Given the nascent status of this token and the lack of available data, it is positioned neutrally within the current market regime.\nMost critical: Devil's Advocate (1.0/10) — AI contrarian (Gemini 2.",
  "debates": [
    {
      "topic": "Technical vs Safety",
      "resolution": "This conflict matters for investors because TechnicianBot's 'good' score merely confirms basic contract deployment, while SecurityBot's 'bad' score reveals critical unmitigated financial and operational risks. A technically verified contract with no activity or liquidity means investors could easily lose capital to a rug pull or be unable to sell due to zero market depth.",
      "outcome": "noted",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "target": "TechnicianBot",
          "targetName": "Technician",
          "content": "Cross-category conflict: Safety scored 3.0/10 while Technical scored 5.0/10. This 2.0-point gap suggests the token's strengths in Technical may not translate to Safety reliability.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "SecurityBot",
          "agentName": "Security",
          "content": "This conflict matters for investors because TechnicianBot's 'good' score merely confirms basic contract deployment, while SecurityBot's 'bad' score reveals critical unmitigated financial and operational risks. A technically verified contract with no activity or liquidity means investors could easily lose capital to a rug pull or be unable to sell due to zero market depth.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "noted"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "topic": "Devil's Advocate vs MacroBot",
      "resolution": "Split verdict: MacroBot maintains 5.0, Devil's Advocate maintains 1.0. Both positions presented.",
      "outcome": "split",
      "rounds": [
        {
          "phase": "challenge",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "MacroBot",
          "targetName": "Macro",
          "content": "⚔️ MacroBot's 'neutral' 5.0/10 score is overly optimistic; 'untested potential' does not equate to neutrality but rather an absence of any positive indicators. A token with zero trading activity, market cap, or social buzz, as MacroBot itself notes, signifies complete fragility and warrants a far more bearish assessment, not a balanced one based on speculative future growth.",
          "round": 1,
          "stance": "challenge"
        },
        {
          "phase": "defense",
          "agent": "MacroBot",
          "agentName": "Macro",
          "target": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "targetName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "content": "While acknowledging the valid concern that zero activity lacks positive indicators, a 5.0/10 score remains appropriate from a macro perspective because the absence of data prevents a definitive bearish assessment. Without any market interaction, the token's macro environment impact is entirely unquantified, meaning it hasn't demonstrated negative macro susceptibility, only a lack of current engagement; a lower score would imply known macro headwinds or fundamental flaws, which are not evident here.",
          "round": 2,
          "stance": "defend"
        },
        {
          "phase": "rebuttal",
          "agent": "DevilsAdvocate",
          "agentName": "Devil's Advocate",
          "target": "MacroBot",
          "targetName": "Macro",
          "content": "⚔️ Macro's argument that 'absence of data prevents a definitive bearish assessment' fundamentally misinterprets risk; zero activity doesn't mean neutral, it means the token has *no* established value or resilience. This complete lack of market interaction, as I argued, signifies absolute fragility, where even minimal negative macro shifts would instantly obliterate any theoretical 'unquantified' potential, warranting a far lower score than 5.0/10.",
          "round": 3,
          "stance": "escalate"
        },
        {
          "phase": "resolution",
          "agent": "MacroBot",
          "agentName": "Macro",
          "content": "While acknowledging that zero activity indeed signals fragility and a lack of established market value, my 5.0/10 score reflects a neutral stance because the absence of *negative* data points prevents an outright bearish classification. It's a 'wait and see' for potential, not an endorsement of current value.",
          "round": 4,
          "stance": "defend"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "upgrade_cta": false,
  "warnings": [
    {
      "severity": "info",
      "code": "GOPLUS_OK",
      "message": "No critical GoPlus security flags detected"
    }
  ],
  "scan_tier": "PRO",
  "success": true,
  "og": {
    "title": "VerdictSwarm:  — Score 46/100",
    "description": "6 agents analyzed this token. Devil's Advocate was the lone dissenter (scored 1.0/10 vs swarm average 4.0).\n⚖️ Technical vs Safety: This conflict matters for investors because TechnicianBot's 'good' s",
    "url": "https://www.vswarm.io/report/0x06d7874037e622d6ef42294cf32eb259806cb1c6"
  }
}